Yeah, this is a great show. It pretty much closed the door on that subject. Oswald and Oswald alone. Who would have thunk?
Guys u want a reliable source. Go to prouty.org This info is from a colonel ex black-ops man who knows a few things about assasinations and coups as he was part of the team that helped take mousadegh out in iran and steal the elections in italy . He was the liason between the army and cia . He was supposed to provide protection for kennedy that day and got called to stand down, that another unit would be there to protect the president. Well guess what folks, that other unit never came. Things that make ya go hmmmmm I dare anyone to call prouty( a very well respected man with a distinguished military career) a conspiracy nutcase.
Hmmmm also oswald was a blatant pro marxist working at a top secret u2 base in japan. Now something doesnt mix with that does it folks looooooooooooooooooooooooooooool Thats like saying osama bin laden being allowed into the white house for morning the with the president lol People please keep digging
No it was a Saudian guy , he made a video and he tell in the video that he shot him !! That the truth !! The Only truth !!! The Guy who Killed kennedy
Checked up Fletcher Prouty in google. Found this: http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/prouty.htm http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/prouty2.htm WTF!
mcaadams is the biggest pro-government site out there on this earth. Of all the places to find info why did u only pull this one out latehorn? As far as fossil fuels i havent studied that enough . Its amazing why u didnt check out all the other links here on prouty and the assasination. Next thing u know, you will put out some links on gerald posner another pro government guy. Latehorn why dont u check out the magic bullet theory and tell me if it make sense to you that the government wants us to believe that a bullet can zig-zag in mid air. Why dont u study nsam 273 and ask around about why it was changed by mcgeorge bundy on his way here from hawaii the same day or day after kennedy was shot. He changed it on the freaking airplane. I can come out with false info on lots of things and call it a site, why dont u look at all resources. I dont have time to post everything here
The History Channel showed one on the Kennedy assassination about two years ago. After watching that one almost anyone would be convinced that Johnson was behind it--not the trigger man, but the decision maker. My theory has always been that Castro was somehow involved. Every president since the assassination has refused to open any type of dialogue with Castro. Even the Clinton administration once said that we will renew relationships with Cuba after Castro is dead, not before. If Castro was involved, the government could not have released that information in the 1960s, or it would have led to WWIII real quickly. I saw a documentary a few months ago that proved that the killing shot did not come from the storm drain by the curb, as some people have speculated. That I can believe, but there isn't much doubt that the killing shot came from the from of the front of the vehicle, not behind. The Zapruder film clearly shows that. 1. There was a clear splatter with blood radiating at right angles. If he was hit from behind, there would have been a spray toward the front of the vehicle. No bullet exits with a blood spray at right angles on the exit side of the shot. 2. His head reeled backward as he was hit. 3. The back of his head was blown off. That's what Jackie is reaching for on the trunk of the vehicle. If he was hit from behind, how come his face was not blown off? Why doesn't anyone question that, especially given the evidence in the Zapruder film? I've seen the autopsy photos. They clearly indicate a shot from the front. I could possible believe the lame explanations about hydraulic pressures being responsible for #2 and #3, but not #1. I'd like to see the BBC documentary.
No they don't want you to believe that. Oliver Stone does. But if you look at how the car Kennedy was shot in was designed. He and the governor are not seated at equal heights right behind each other. There is a decent amount of offset. If you place them behind each other and level, there is a magic bullet. If you put them in a car designed just like the car they were actually in, the line is perfectly straight.
Didn't know that, but from what I've seen it debunks the Kennedy conspiracy. I haven't seen any pro-government opinion theory. Infact, he even reccomends the book by Prouty and gives him an amazon buy-here-link. You can't tell everybody that disagree with you to be pro-gumberment. http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=2207604&postcount=39 Perhaps because your magic bullet theory doesn't make any sense. Oh, and debunk this page, thanks.
This is unreal. It looks like u just wanna see the big lie the warren commission wanted us all to believe. Did any of you bother to read the warren comission. Did any of you bother to understand that the warren comission had expert riflemen try that shooting and not one of them could pull it off and oswald barely knew how to use a gun by his shooting tests results in the armed forces. Latehorn can u explain why oswald who was overtly marxist and bragged about it was allowed to serve on a high level secret u2 base???????? Just give me till the weekend and im gonna shread this BS that u guys are trying to pull over on the board. Latehorn if the oswald case is iron clad why did teh government decide to withold all the evidence from the second investigation till the year 2029? You cant answer that question can you. I will answer all ur question when i have time over the weekend Please answer the question about 2029. I DARE YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
Because Castro was involved. If they had announced this the US would have been forced by public pressure to attack Cuba, which was defended by Russia. That would have plunged us into WWIII and possibly a nuclear war. I suspect that we will just have to wait until 2029 to know for certain.
This is why you conspiracy dolts are silly. Barely knew how to use a gun? He was a trained marksman in the marines. Also, they showed a guy on discovery channel firing off the shots in less time than Oswald took. Load, aim, fire. It was pretty awesome actually. Totally doable. Simply put, this little tidbit of yours shows how poorly you are informed. The guys who did the tests hit the target 3 out of 3 times from the same distance. Oswald only did 2 hits. He wasn't perfect, but good enough to do what he wanted to do.
Once again showing what one motivated Marine and their rifle can do. From the Warren Commission: "On a scale of expert-sharpshooter-marksman, Oswald scored two points above the minimum for sharpshooter on one occasion (December 1956) and only one point above the minimum requirement for marksman on another (May 1959) -- his last recorded score. Colonel A. G. Folsom evaluated these scores for the Commission:" Two points above Sharpshooter is hardly a poor shot. It's not expert, but it is "pretty good" according to the USMC.
There's a reason why they no-longer allow president to do that anymore ie drive in an open car. JFK's assasination has been throroughly reviewed through modern technology. The film digital designed showed a rather plausible story of what happened. Almost every conspiratory beliefs have been reviewed and debunked (based on the objective information one can acess from that video). All there are is questions...and while questions are important, they don't imply guilt or facts. Like my question on RFK...I'm curious why there was more bullet holes surrounding his place of assasination, than there was loaded in his assassin's gun. This doesn't directly imply that there absolutely is a conspiracy, but it's a very important question. Personally I think Bobby could have been an excellent president....because he was a man of true compassion and principle. It's too bad democrats (now-a-days) don't support those kind-of dems.