That what countries do. They borrow money in order to fit their budget. A growing debt is not uncommon. The US debt % of GDP haven't increased very significantly enough to make the conclusion that their economy is going to hell because of it. You can see the graph here. The situation was worser in 1995 than it's today according to the graph. Also Japan have a debt of 175.5%(of their GDP) which is more than double than the 64.7%(of their GDP) debt of US. Also you have failed to provide any sources for your claims whatsoever. Sure, Australia is better off debt-wise, but not growth wise. No, but the man described the plane as a cruise missile with wings Yes, I know that it's a government department, I haven't stated otherwise. Yes, the Government has the majority, that's what I meant. Now answer the question; are they part of a conspiracy? Hiding? You might mean the footage of the Pentagon? FBI can't actually release all the footage due to private ownership of materials being used as evidence, since it's protected by the 5 Amendment in the American constitution It's actually your job to dig the article and the sources it refer to and see if you can find any false information within it, otherwise you might not comment it.
you'll find i use a lot of US words or spelling, we lived in the usa and canada when i was a teen. daddy was killed in canada by a DUI when i was 17, mom died 3 years ago, ( we never talked for the last 5 years) i just found out in jan this year.
They did a fine job of documenting this. In fact, it almost seems that they worded it such that young angry white males with low IQs could actually read and comprehend it as well. I note it covers something I see CTs do quite often. Formulate questions based on a false premise. IE: Rumsfeld ordering sand. I see this a lot. Even AGS should be able to comprehend this one. That is, if he really wanted to
Snopes has been debunked many times, here's a couple of examples: http://911review.org/Wiki/snopespentagonrumor.html http://investigate911.bravehost.com/ http://pentagon.batcave.net/
Wow, amazing, snopes has only been debunked on 9/11 conspriacy theories.. Hmmm.. Seems like a snope to me.
You have no idea what you are talking about and any economist reading this post will agree with me here. Where do you think America is going to keep borrowing money from? Do you think they can just 'print some more'? They are going to run out of money to borrow, and then what? They're screwed We are talking about the Australian Government, which has nothing to do with 9/11. No you didn't, you said the Government didn't have the majority, which was incorrect. Who knows how far the conspiracy runs deep, but I doubt it - the more people that know the more chance of it getting out. They would keep it very hush hush What, the footage which they stole from the petrol station that was near by? They own that petrol station do they? Don't think so I could do what you do and pull out 1 random article and say "here I'm right" even though the article proves jack all towards your argument.
Gtech who the fuck do you think you are? It is quite obvious from your posts that you are insecure and have low self-esteem, and rely on paying other people out in order to make yourself feel more important. It's probably a pattern you have had for a long time now, but you really should work on getting rid of it and build some confidence which doesn't stem from trying to prove yourself superior to everyone else. Oh and also, I would kick your arse on any IQ test.
So in other words, you didn't have any arguments against the data I provided you and kept on your ranting. As the graph shows, their debt situation is right now not very "catastrophic" today. However, if they continue for let's say 10-20 years, it will be. But that's very unlikely, since the Democrats&New-President will probably take expenses more seriously and end the Mid-East wars. Also, how about Japans debt? We was talking about Al Qaida, not about 9/11 I didn't say that your government didn't have the majority, I asked you "doesn't they need some sort majority to make anti-terror laws in Australia?". Yes, if was a conspiracy they would keep it around a few. If Al-Qaida is a conspiracy, it's must be a world wide Illuminati like such. If 9/11 is a conspiracy, they would certainly not use a cruise missile against Pentagon, since it would be a heck lot of a easier to make it simple and just use a plane to crash in the building. For example; No foreign Intelligence agencies would disagree with you then. They didn't stole it. FBI have right to confiscate materials that can be used as evidence in courts. But they can't immediately release it to the public. So, it makes sense. My job is not to research every article&sources for you, that's your job, since you can't trust my research to 100%. I usually take a look at articles that others posts. Usually, if they post a lot articles that doesn't make sense or includes false information, I stop recognize them as reliable. What you can do is to check up it's references and tell me if the analyze is flawed or something.
Whoops.. Anger facter just went 4.5 on the YAWMWLIQ scale. Someone struck a nerve. Anger now results in a self examination. Thank you for sharing. Someone has an inferiority complex, me thinks.... This post alone kinda negates that claim, don't ya think?
I don't think anyone has an inferiority complex mia. It's true that Gtech can get a little carried away with the same repetitive insults. Ad Hominem shows little wit.
just given some rep for that post, EDIT: ooops it wont let me give you rep because i gave you rep last time too, sorry
Unfortunately a lot of the sites these sites link to are dead, so I can't talk to what they say, but the batcave site, in particular proceeds on a lot of false assumptions that have already been discussed time and time again. And all of it is based on cartoon physics, as we've previously learned - is not an accurate representation of real life. They keep expecting that, once a plane hits a building, its going to leave a cartoon outline of itself there. Latehorn's previous video shows that planes pretty much turn to dust upon impact with anything that isn't a cloud. For AGS, when daffy duck runs into a wall at 500 MPH, this is not the result. As much as you'd like to be, this is not reality.
Mia, don't forget that rochow applies to the young-angry-white-males-with-low-IQs category Well at least.. he can at least make me laugh He seems to base his belief by thinking that it would be more debris/cars/shit/whatever around pentagon. I would like to see his response to the youtube video I posted that shows the plane being splattered into pieces. I would like hear why he thinks that FBI must show all evidence to the public when the constitution doesn't allow it. If he's suspicious every time evidence is confiscated by a ruling authority(which is very common). But most of all, I would like how he define evidence and burden of proof. When an authority should be believed and when not etc.