So that would be a no, you don't want to address the topic of the thread and say a bad word? Duly noted...again. Eyes are watching
Congratulation for proving again and again that you are just brainless bigot who does not have anything of importance to say.
I have an observation: That sign says "God Bless Hitler" Other signs have said "Bush == Hitler" An 18 year old saved by Americans murders Americans. If we put the two signs together they say "God Bless Bush" And this ends todays lesson on cognitive dissonance. When you don't know who the enemy is it readily explains why you become paranoid and just start killing anyone.
Rick, you said this guy was a survivor of this massacre... Could this have been post-traumatic stress disorder? He was only 18.
The guys family was on TV this morning, trying to plead their case that the family is not terrorists....and I agree with that statement, the family is not, but this animal is a terrorist. Just imagine if this had been a Jew who did this, or a mormon, or a christian? Religion would be broadcast by every media outlet then...
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/02/14/salt.lake.shooting.ap/index.html Dressed in black, wearing a trench coat; several scrapes with the law throughout his brief life. Columbine, sadly, yes, but religious fanaticism, no. The religious background of the mass murderers of our times are, to my knowledge, not discussed; if so, I don't know if it's made anything but incidental. Except in this instance. Families lost loved ones. Mourn for them - including the family of this sick, young, dead, man.
the religious background is a big deal...remember Dennis Rader, the BTK killer? he was a Lutheran...his church was all over the news for weeks....again, if this was a christian or a jew...it would be all over the news. Yes, we do...
OK. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Rader Total words in article: 5266 Total words devoted to his religious background/affiliation: 17 17/5266, or 0.32% of total words devoted to his religious affiliation. A quick search elsewhere (one of many, from what I can tell, following similar patterns): http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/03/01/btk.investigation/index.html Total words: 849 Total words devoted to his religious background/affiliation: 10 (5, actually, repeated once) or 1.2%. http://www.kansas.com/mld/kansas/news/special_packages/btk/11062626.htm Total words: 4107 Total words devoted to his religious background/affiliation: 8 or 0.19%. I just grabbed up several articles as randomly as possible, that should be as exemplary of what was written about your subject as possible; if there was a pattern, I would expect to see it. But in these articles, and others I didn't post, we have the incidental mention of his background - anywhere from a mere 0.2% to 1.2% - and nothing on the order of what this thread has done in ascribing this sick young man's murder spree to some fanatical Islam. These articles mention his affiliation, as it is a paradox - the family man, member of his community, etc., who turned out to be the BTK killer. This is absurd, in my opinion. D16, if you have proof of what you are saying, I would view it with an open mind. As it stands, it smacks of the very "victim mentality" you disparage elsewhere. No one that I can see says "BTK - lunatic Lutheran!!!!!!!!" They just look on in horror. Much as for the story that concerns this thread.
You are finally beginning to see d16boy, Gtech and others like them for who they are and the hatred and bigotry that motivates them.
Thanks for the sources...I just remember (and was referring to) him and his church being all over the TV news....even his bishop was interviewed when they found out that he was the church council president...furthermore, it has been all over the news for the last week how a Lutheran pastor in Georgia was removed from his church just because he was in an open gay relationship...and technically that is not even a crime...however, CNN, MSNBC, FOX, ABC, they all carried it...religion is extremely important in the USA, unless of course you are muslim, which was my original point. JMO though...
Can you see how the religion becomes a subject of discussion when a PASTOR is in open gay relationship? I take it back, most likely you can not. There is even TV programs by different churches and during Christmas they show the Vatican and the pope on the TV, so may be you can use it as excuse to spread your hatred and bigotry.
Nice try. Do not ever presume to tell me what I am "finally beginning to see," nor try to involve me in your polemic. I respect Gtech, though we disagree on many things; I don't yet know D16man. Regardless, I want no part of your game.
I second that....I have no such hate or bigortry for the pope, rome, or the church...what I do have a dislike of is the "kill the infidels" attitude portrayed by many, but not all, muslims.... Northpoint, I appreciate your honesty....I think that we too would disagree, but I also think we can mutually disagree with respect...which I know GW cannot do.
That happened around 96'. Many years ago... I'm not going to talk about something I don't know, but I would assume after some time you say something is less likely. But what do I know!? Could be.
What are you afraid of, Gtech posting "Eyes are watching"? Don't worry, even after 6 years of this administration there is enough free speech rights left that you can disagree with bigots without being scared that they are going to send you to Guantanamo bay.
I only fear religious fervor in political thought - and neither side of the political spectrum has the corner on babblespeak. I try think for myself, admit my mistakes, and not be afraid to change my opinion based on available evidence. I don't always succeed, but it's what I shoot for.