Sorry, AGS.. but this have been explained over and over like 2 million times. It's ok to question things, but when you get an answer, you should either except that answer or perhaps respond to the answer(if you believe that the answer is invalid). However, it seems to me that 'truthers' tends to question a lot of things (which isn't wrong, it's always ok to question). Now, if truthers discover a new claim, which fits well with their own belief, they tend to buy it easy, without question it, just right off no matter how stupid it is. And when they discover a claim which doesn't fit their theories, then they usually don't buy it, no matter the reasons. You see, you and most other 'truthers' have already made your conclusions and you have strongly decided that your own conclusions must be true (of some reason). One of your conclusions is that WTC7 is a controlled demolition. However, isn't it weird that the holes in the Operation 9-11 plot is mainly discovered by young angry white males with an IQ in the mid-80, while researchers with 20-30 years experience in demolition agree with the NIST report? Now I'm going to make an example of how the 9-11 debate looks like here on DP (a simple example). No it's 3, you missed that the 4 was divided with 2. Later in another thread.. No it's 3, you missed that the 4 was divided with 2. Later in another thread.. No it's 3, you missed that the 4 was divided with 2. Later in another thread.. No it's 3, you missed that the 4 was divided with 2. ..And so on.. Wake up, AGS!
Actually, I don't know why foreknowledge has to be debunked. It's hard to sort between different rumors(even for FBI), since most of these doesn't lead into anything. But it was debunked despite this, along with everything else.
All right mate! No need to get defensive, I was only curious... Anyway, "Aero" is greek for "air" so...
It wouldn't surprice me if all claims in that movie have been debunked somewhere on DP. I wont see another long 9/11-plot-movie. Write a text based claim instead.
Thats like watching porn in writing. I am a man....so video is needed. Plus, how the hell can I eat so that my neck gets fat for future beheading security if I try to type all the time! I must get fat and typing screws that up D
I'm simply curious how and why conspiracy theorists get all the time to watch every 2 hour video that comes out on the subject. Are they not employed and do they not have a real life? Wait..I think some questions, possibly, answer themselves
Actually, its ouvranos (transliterated) in greek....I've had four years of greek... Most work at tech jobs, so all they do all day is stare at a comp screen....the others are funded by a little thing we call "welfare" because they are too lazy and too stupid to get a job...
Has it? The real smoking gun from 9/11 is the collapse of WTC7. Let us forget about all the other anomalies for a minute. WTC7 collapsed into it's own footprint, it was not hit by a plane, had minor fires and had extensive damage caused to one side of it due to being hit by some falling debris from the twin towers, yet it collapsed perfectly. Many other buildings surrounding the twin towers were also extensively damaged but they didn't collapse.
AGS here you go again, you just asked what people think, and if they have thought about it, i told you my thoughts on it, and why i dont believe the crap you seem hell bent on standing by as the must be something because "freefall speed" says so. but if you are willing to work out the maths and look at the evidence you'll see it fell almost for 17 seconds, and your free fall speed does not take into account the floors left standing.
no but where pulled down. why dont you respond with something to dismiss my tower 1 and 2 collapse? is it because you now accept that you were taken in by the movie loose change? or is it because what i said is really what happend and you are to stupid to work it out for yourself?
What math? the towers collapsed doing damage to the other buildings...the others had to be pulled down (which is less problematic than blowing them up in downtown NYC)...where is math involved? lets see: 1 tower collapsing + 1 more tower collapsing = a lot of damage to other buildings that are non-repairable. Non-repairable buildings x cost of being fixed = not worth it. Not worth it is = to the building needing to be taken down. The building needing to be taken down = not by the govt. not by the govt. = head scratching for idiot conspiracy theorists. idiot conspiracy theorists = support for the terrorists. I think that "sums" it all up....