The Real Cause of 911?

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by yo-yo, Dec 22, 2005.

  1. latehorn

    latehorn Guest

    Messages:
    4,676
    Likes Received:
    238
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #441
    Sorry, AGS.. but this have been explained over and over like 2 million times. It's ok to question things, but when you get an answer, you should either except that answer or perhaps respond to the answer(if you believe that the answer is invalid).

    However, it seems to me that 'truthers' tends to question a lot of things (which isn't wrong, it's always ok to question). Now, if truthers discover a new claim, which fits well with their own belief, they tend to buy it easy, without question it, just right off no matter how stupid it is. And when they discover a claim which doesn't fit their theories, then they usually don't buy it, no matter the reasons. You see, you and most other 'truthers' have already made your conclusions and you have strongly decided that your own conclusions must be true (of some reason). One of your conclusions is that WTC7 is a controlled demolition.

    However, isn't it weird that the holes in the Operation 9-11 plot is mainly discovered by young angry white males with an IQ in the mid-80, while researchers with 20-30 years experience in demolition agree with the NIST report?

    Now I'm going to make an example of how the 9-11 debate looks like here on DP (a simple example).

    No it's 3, you missed that the 4 was divided with 2.

    Later in another thread..
    No it's 3, you missed that the 4 was divided with 2.

    Later in another thread..
    No it's 3, you missed that the 4 was divided with 2.

    Later in another thread..
    No it's 3, you missed that the 4 was divided with 2.

    ..And so on.. Wake up, AGS!
     
    latehorn, Feb 11, 2007 IP
  2. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #442
    Where's AGS? Is he running from the truth again?
     
    GTech, Feb 11, 2007 IP
  3. latehorn

    latehorn Guest

    Messages:
    4,676
    Likes Received:
    238
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #443
    Actually, I don't know why foreknowledge has to be debunked. It's hard to sort between different rumors(even for FBI), since most of these doesn't lead into anything. But it was debunked despite this, along with everything else.
     
    latehorn, Feb 11, 2007 IP
  4. bigdoug

    bigdoug Peon

    Messages:
    845
    Likes Received:
    54
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #444
    bigdoug, Feb 11, 2007 IP
  5. BRUm

    BRUm Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,086
    Likes Received:
    61
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    100
    #445
    All right mate! No need to get defensive, I was only curious...

    Anyway, "Aero" is greek for "air" so... :D
     
    BRUm, Feb 11, 2007 IP
  6. CountryBoy

    CountryBoy Prominent Member

    Messages:
    8,970
    Likes Received:
    754
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #446
    Here's me thinking it was lighter than ordinary chocolate!

     
    CountryBoy, Feb 11, 2007 IP
  7. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #447
    lorien1973, Feb 11, 2007 IP
  8. BRUm

    BRUm Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,086
    Likes Received:
    61
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    100
    #448
    Hmmm Aero bars are OK ... but you can't beat good ol' Cadbury! :D
     
    BRUm, Feb 11, 2007 IP
  9. bigdoug

    bigdoug Peon

    Messages:
    845
    Likes Received:
    54
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #449
    Dang, I did not think about that? Need some U2 in the back ground.
     
    bigdoug, Feb 11, 2007 IP
  10. latehorn

    latehorn Guest

    Messages:
    4,676
    Likes Received:
    238
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #450
    latehorn, Feb 11, 2007 IP
  11. latehorn

    latehorn Guest

    Messages:
    4,676
    Likes Received:
    238
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #451
    and Batman is real.. hehe
     
    latehorn, Feb 11, 2007 IP
  12. bigdoug

    bigdoug Peon

    Messages:
    845
    Likes Received:
    54
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #452
    Thats like watching porn in writing. I am a man....so video is needed. Plus, how the hell can I eat so that my neck gets fat for future beheading security if I try to type all the time!

    I must get fat and typing screws that up :D


    D
     
    bigdoug, Feb 11, 2007 IP
  13. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #453
    I'm simply curious how and why conspiracy theorists get all the time to watch every 2 hour video that comes out on the subject. Are they not employed and do they not have a real life?

    Wait..I think some questions, possibly, answer themselves :D
     
    lorien1973, Feb 11, 2007 IP
  14. d16man

    d16man Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,900
    Likes Received:
    160
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #454
    Actually, its ouvranos (transliterated) in greek....I've had four years of greek...:D:D

    Most work at tech jobs, so all they do all day is stare at a comp screen....the others are funded by a little thing we call "welfare" because they are too lazy and too stupid to get a job...
     
    d16man, Feb 11, 2007 IP
  15. AGS

    AGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,543
    Likes Received:
    257
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    265
    #455
    Has it?

    The real smoking gun from 9/11 is the collapse of WTC7.

    Let us forget about all the other anomalies for a minute. WTC7 collapsed into it's own footprint, it was not hit by a plane, had minor fires and had extensive damage caused to one side of it due to being hit by some falling debris from the twin towers, yet it collapsed perfectly.

    Many other buildings surrounding the twin towers were also extensively damaged but they didn't collapse.
     
    AGS, Feb 11, 2007 IP
  16. moneyspeaks

    moneyspeaks Peon

    Messages:
    450
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #456
    why'd they do it "the oldest reason in the world, money". -south park president bush.
     
    moneyspeaks, Feb 11, 2007 IP
  17. samantha pia

    samantha pia Prominent Member

    Messages:
    4,639
    Likes Received:
    482
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #457
    AGS here you go again, you just asked what people think, and if they have thought about it, i told you my thoughts on it, and why i dont believe the crap you seem hell bent on standing by as the must be something because "freefall speed" says so. but if you are willing to work out the maths and look at the evidence you'll see it fell almost for 17 seconds, and your free fall speed does not take into account the floors left standing.
     
    samantha pia, Feb 11, 2007 IP
  18. samantha pia

    samantha pia Prominent Member

    Messages:
    4,639
    Likes Received:
    482
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #458
    no but where pulled down.
    why dont you respond with something to dismiss my tower 1 and 2 collapse? is it because you now accept that you were taken in by the movie loose change?

    or is it because what i said is really what happend and you are to stupid to work it out for yourself?
     
    samantha pia, Feb 11, 2007 IP
  19. AGS

    AGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,543
    Likes Received:
    257
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    265
    #459
    Exactly!

    You do the math idiot. ;)
     
    AGS, Feb 11, 2007 IP
  20. d16man

    d16man Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,900
    Likes Received:
    160
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #460
    What math? the towers collapsed doing damage to the other buildings...the others had to be pulled down (which is less problematic than blowing them up in downtown NYC)...where is math involved? lets see:


    1 tower collapsing + 1 more tower collapsing = a lot of damage to other buildings that are non-repairable.

    Non-repairable buildings x cost of being fixed = not worth it.

    Not worth it is = to the building needing to be taken down.

    The building needing to be taken down = not by the govt.

    not by the govt. = head scratching for idiot conspiracy theorists.

    idiot conspiracy theorists = support for the terrorists.


    I think that "sums" it all up....
     
    d16man, Feb 11, 2007 IP