Dishonest Gtech, is this enough source for you? You are so used to lie and forge and change other people posts that you assume everyone is the same as you.
i see you argue day in and day out to prove OBL and other terrorists point everytime a moslem tries to seperate himself and islam from terrorists you try to prove him wrong and put them together these are the moderate moslems that we need to support and these are the ideas that we have to let florish. to prove my point i post the link to the heritage foundation which as you must admit is neither liberal or anti bush but you insist that your view on the matter has more weight and your approach is better so the question is why? and what party you feel closest to your opinions? who else outside of this forum supports your view? i will read your links in a little bit but for now i have to go.
The source is fine, however, you have still yet to dig up your post where you claimed that you referenced this. Did you want to saying anything bad about terrorists while you're at it?
So pretty much I was right, you really didn't have any issues with the actual topics of discussions, your only point is this? Pretty much like I called it. Avoid the issues by taking it personal. Nice job, pizzaboy
While many Republican are in the closet because of their sexual orientation, Dishonest Gtech is a KKK supporter who is in the closet because of his ideology and lack of balls to stand up for his belief system.
Actually, I tried discussing the issues relating to the topic of the thread, but you were not interested in the issues. Your only interest is in silencing the messengers. Are you saying you'd like to discuss the issues now? I find that highly doubtful, but I'm game if you are.
Right GTech I am going to say this for the last time, so please try and get it through your thick skull. I am AGAINST terrorism- talk about it and discuss it to your hearts desire, I will not stop you. I don't care wether its terrorism within Islam or christianity or anywhere else, I have not (will not) tried to cover up or offer any excuse for their behaviour. One thing I will not stand for and will speak out against is if people continue to protest that Islam is responsible for the actions of these terrorists. What is so difficult to understand about that? you keep on saying I attack the messengers and not the message? You are seriously messed up with your warped way of thinking, for once in your life actually try to see what the other person is saying not what you want them to say. p.s Have you studied psychology, because you make out like you know whats going on in other peoples heads and try to dictate their thoughts.
Please GTech, Go shout out these 'issues' from the rooftop. No one has tried to silence you - the messenger come out of your shell and enter the real world .
i have explained my point to you numerous time the problem is you dont pay attention read the point 7,8 and 9 it shows you the best way of fighting terrorists and hopefully you will see why i think your post are counter productive
Unlike you, IF they were my friends, I do HAVE the balls to admit it and stand up for my belief. Does every one notice the IF in that sentence? That is because I do not want that dishonest Gtech remove the IF and make it sound totally the opposite. So now that you have all the sources including these people own admission, are you condemning this group of Americans (I refuse to call these criminals a soldier) for raping the teenage girl and killing the innocent civilians?
Once again, making something that is not the issue, the issue, in order to cover up other things. I do not contend you are against terrorism, nor have I said such. It's no different than if I busted in the thread and said: "I am AGAINST grape juice - talk about it and discuss it to your hearts desire, I will not stop you." Actually, you did. And I let you do it. Remember, I pointed out your strategy when you first started trying to get off the topic by making it personal. So this is not true. It is, and I've sourced those as well. However, when I do (apes and pigs ring a bell) you immediately go into denial in the presence of overwhelming information. This is exactly what you have been doing. I even pointed it out earlier today when you started it. I suppose I could dig up the post. But what you offer is dishonest and not truthful. Therefore I cannot accept it, which is why I spend a great deal of time posting references to data that proves you are not being truthful. Now if you were actually correct, of if YOU actually posted data to support your position, you'd have some room to wiggle. Non responsive, just more of what you say you are not doing, but that I continue to point out you are doing.
You didn't answer the question in my post: Do you or are you still cheering these criminals and calling them soldiers?
Right GTech whats going on here?! http://www.progressiveu.org/073638-...-textbooks-calling-jews-apes-and-muslims-pigs Still the same reaction?