Your wasting your time with Gtech. In his ideology there is no freedom of speech, there is no requirement to charge people with crime, have a trial or defense attorneys. People can disappear for ever and be tortured. Raping women and killing civilians is OK as long as it is done in the name of God and country. His concern his not about the country or safety of nation, he is just looking for an opportunity for psychopaths to run free and spread hatred every where they go.
I never said we were. But some are enemies of our country. No one is scared. Self loathing on behalf of your country is popular and fashionable and you make it seem like the in thing to do. All of your red herrings are without merit. You mask your desire to see elected officials bash your country by shield yourself with freedom of speech. What a sad case you are! Discussed what? Kerry's latest "foot in mouth?" You're probably looking for the koz kids site, right? http://news.bostonherald.com/politics/view.bg?articleid=179828
How's your buddy, al qaida terrorist Jose Padilla doing, gworld? Would you like to start another thread in support of an al qaida terrorist? Demand their innocense without a trial, but convict US soldiers before a trial. Seems you think more highly of terrorists than you do US soldiers. Gee, there's a surprise! Never a bad word for a terrorist.
If you noticed, I am defending the soldiers against the disgrace that your association with them can cause any honorable person in uniform. I don't want people to believe that just because you portray yourself as a former soldier then it means that every soldier is a supporter of rape or murder. Those people who committed those criminal acts and people like you who support them are in reality just a minority that are equally despised by REAL soldiers.
Nope, only in your delusional world. In fact, you were (once again, as usual) convicting them based on charges. But you'd never do that for a terrorist, would you? As I said, convicting them without a trial. Something you'd never do for a terrorist. One rule for your buds, the terrorists, another rule for the soldiers you love to hate. BTW, got some more of your buds in Iraq!
i just hate your way of thinking and it seems that majority of the country agrees with me we should start doing some investigation as to what has happened in the past few years but now i want to go see bill gates interview so goodnight
I'm not sure the majority agrees. Are you getting that information from the latest biased media poll? Those polls change constantly, and every poll, no matter who does it, is biased.
Is this the reason you make personal attacks instead of engaging in logical debate, or answering to every single time I've shot your limp-wristed pseudo-intellectual pacifist nonsense theories full of holes? False patriotism? Pffft. I value the freedoms I have, and I sure as hell don't piss and moan about the best damn country in the world from within the safe confines of its borders.
I haven't seen a poll where Americans have voted to say they appreciate and support an elected official of the US bashing American abroad, telling lies to do so, in the presence of some that are hostile towards our country. Most Americans I know don't want their elected representatives giving aid and comfort to our enemies.
Yet another in a long line of pummelings. What say ye, gworld? Have you figured out how to explain your clear and documented hypocrisy in favor of people who would gut your sissy ass like a fish just for being an American? You're not doing the people of the M.E. any favors. They hate you as much as they hate me. Maybe more.
I think the cluelessness we're observing here can be traced to youthful exuberance and a lack of experience in all things "real". John Kerry has the "freedom" to say whatever he wants, and I'd defend that freedom with honor. EVEN if I don't agree with what he says. HOW-freaking-EVER..... One must ALSO understand (read carefully, kiddies, this is pretty simple) that there are NATURAL CONSEQUENCES that exist and occur in response to what one chooses to dribble out of one's mouth. In this case, the consequences are clear: Kerry is seen for what he truly is: an opportunistic hypocrite who sways with the breeze, believes what he thinks you'll like him to believe, and says stupid things in a public forum. Are you still reading carefully? No one's taking his "freedom of speech" away. Next time you think your freedoms are ABSOLUTE, try yelling "Fire!" in a crowded theatre or pissing on the swiss cheese at your local deli. Let us know what the consequences are, and if the Constitution precludes those.
Why did I just get a mental image of Elaine from Seinfeld, throwing up her hands and storming out of the room just then? You got nothing, pizzaboy. I'll take a thin-crust Supreme with extra cheese, and make it quick - The menfolk are discussing Worldly Matters.
Good gawd! /gtech grabs some popcorn and watches the ass whoopin's being dealt out! Damn! This is much better than CSI Miami