The Pagerank (PR) Thread

Discussion in 'Google' started by dvduval, Jan 2, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. my44

    my44 Peon

    Messages:
    722
    Likes Received:
    24
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #1601
    I actually saw 3 "movement" (if there's such word), something like PR0 at certain DCs and PR5 at other DCs. So can this be considered an update? But other sites seem "stable" with no "movement".

    What does if it mean if for the same domain name, it says PR0 Cached=Yes and PR5 Cached=Yes? If indeed it's an update, it'll be Cached=No, correct?

    http://livepr.raketforskning.com/?u=uluwatu.org
    http://livepr.raketforskning.com/?u=java.uluwatu.org
    http://livepr.raketforskning.com/?u=www.malaysiahotelreview.com
     
    my44, Jan 13, 2007 IP
  2. CrankyDave

    CrankyDave Peon

    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    23
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #1602
    81 pages of drivel doesn't make the drivel more meaningful, just lengthy. ;)

    Dave
     
    CrankyDave, Jan 13, 2007 IP
  3. mvandemar

    mvandemar Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,409
    Likes Received:
    307
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #1603
    Well, it wasn't all drivel.

    Also, in this case, since the statement was "meaningful to alot of people", then yeah, length does matter. :D

    -Michael
     
    mvandemar, Jan 13, 2007 IP
  4. CrankyDave

    CrankyDave Peon

    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    23
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #1604
    And my original statement was in reply to...

    Hmmm... better rankings but no change in PR.

    Wonder what that might suggest? :rolleyes:

    Dave
     
    CrankyDave, Jan 13, 2007 IP
  5. rochow

    rochow Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,991
    Likes Received:
    245
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #1605
    The fuss about toolbar PR is that it shows to the world your site has PR

    You could have more PR than myspace, but unless its shown on the toolbar no-one will believe you

    That also applies when you buy links. Just because a page is PR4 in the toolbar doesn't mean the actual PR of the page your link is on is PR4... it just means it was when the update happened. It could now be 1,6, even 0, who knows
     
    rochow, Jan 13, 2007 IP
  6. MrMOJO

    MrMOJO Well-Known Member Affiliate Manager

    Messages:
    817
    Likes Received:
    32
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    100
    #1606
    I'd appreciate if you wouldn't quote me in your drivel.
     
    MrMOJO, Jan 13, 2007 IP
  7. Phynder

    Phynder Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,603
    Likes Received:
    145
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    178
    #1607
    That you don't see the actual PR on the toolbar that is stored at the 'plex for SERP calculations.
     
    Phynder, Jan 13, 2007 IP
  8. CrankyDave

    CrankyDave Peon

    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    23
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #1608
    Toolbar PR is an export of the actual Google internal PR converted into the 1-10 scale seen in green.

    This is a given.

    It tells you what? Nothing when it comes to ranking.

    Dave
     
    CrankyDave, Jan 13, 2007 IP
  9. CrankyDave

    CrankyDave Peon

    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    23
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #1609
    Don't want to be quoted?

    Don't post. ;)

    Dave
     
    CrankyDave, Jan 13, 2007 IP
  10. Phynder

    Phynder Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,603
    Likes Received:
    145
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    178
    #1610
    Since when? I would love to see some documentation of that!
     
    Phynder, Jan 13, 2007 IP
  11. CrankyDave

    CrankyDave Peon

    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    23
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #1611
    Hehehehe...

    Be right back. :D

    Dave
     
    CrankyDave, Jan 13, 2007 IP
  12. CrankyDave

    CrankyDave Peon

    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    23
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #1612
    CrankyDave, Jan 13, 2007 IP
  13. Phynder

    Phynder Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,603
    Likes Received:
    145
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    178
    #1613
    Remember - the toolbar is a poor representation - only being an integer - of the PR they have access to at the plex. Consider for a moment the difference between a PR 6.1 and a 6.9 - that is a huge difference, but most likely they would both show up in the toolbar as a PR6. So, first you are losing a great deal of information for the integer representation of PR. Secondly - and perhaps most importantly, the very second that they begin the export of the PR to the toolbar - that is HISTORICAL DATA. Since PR is in everflux - always being updated, the moment it is published it is out of date.

    These are the issues to which I am referring.
     
    Phynder, Jan 13, 2007 IP
  14. CrankyDave

    CrankyDave Peon

    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    23
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #1614
    Did I not say it is the internal PR converted into the 1-10 green scale we see?

    Did I not *hint* that what we see does not influence SERP's when the question was asked?

    Dave
     
    CrankyDave, Jan 13, 2007 IP
  15. mvandemar

    mvandemar Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,409
    Likes Received:
    307
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #1615
    Actually, it's out of date even before then. It is a representation from a given snapshot (or, in the case of this update, what looks like any one of several snapshots). These snapshots are anywhere from 3 weeks to several months old, apparently.

    However, PR is still meaningful and useful, even if it is historical.

    -Michael
     
    mvandemar, Jan 13, 2007 IP
  16. Phynder

    Phynder Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,603
    Likes Received:
    145
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    178
    #1616
     
    Phynder, Jan 13, 2007 IP
  17. CrankyDave

    CrankyDave Peon

    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    23
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #1617
    Did someone say it was real time? ;)

    Dave
     
    CrankyDave, Jan 13, 2007 IP
  18. Phynder

    Phynder Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,603
    Likes Received:
    145
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    178
    #1618
    I think my point is - (not sure what my point is..) - that it is impossible correlate the effect of PR on SERPs, because SERPs we can see in real-time the positioning of a site; however, we only ever have a historical (perhaps even months old at times) representation of PR.
     
    Phynder, Jan 13, 2007 IP
  19. CrankyDave

    CrankyDave Peon

    Messages:
    280
    Likes Received:
    23
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #1619
    Which is exactly what I suggested with my posts.

    Even added the *hint* *hint* part just in case my point was being missed.

    Dave
     
    CrankyDave, Jan 13, 2007 IP
  20. mvandemar

    mvandemar Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,409
    Likes Received:
    307
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #1620
    Hey, I understand ya. :D

    Dave, you were implying that since there was a change in SERPs and not in the visible PR that it was further proof that there is no correlation between PR and SERPs. That part would be wrong, but I think what you were trying to say is that people shouldn't get excited about PR updates, since they don't affect SERPs... am I right?

    Either way, people who understand PR and it's inter-relation to the big picture do garner insights from these updates, not to mention that often times other updates accompany PR updates, so it's definitely something to watch, if you happen to be into that sort of thing.

    -Michael
     
    mvandemar, Jan 13, 2007 IP
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.