Not really... it has been proven time and again it's no big advantage... think 'page segmentation' or 'block level analysis' - the engines are much better at indexing and as such the ordering is not a huge concern
It really depends, if you want to find an easy way to get content, I like using css. Mainly because it´s so easy to update.
Well hey - between us we got to bits of advice out - over the same post... double the pleasure..woo woo
Most important thing to me is to have content that is original, seo wise that is something that benefits you the most long term speaking.
Yeah I hear ya - not sure why some one wouldn't want to? Other than the obvious of course.. I never advise clients (nor on our own sites) doing anything BUT unique content. It is not simply content - it is part of building the brand (personality) of the site.... yeeesh
Also I believe that you don´t need huge amounts of content to rank. The combo of an old established site with fresh content as well as old, unique content is great. Especially when you have some deeplinks into the individual pages.
keep your site live and do add some fresh things to your site so that you visitors can found new things or come to see whats new
what's the difference between a deep link, backlink and regular link? New to SEO and trying to learn the lingo. Thanks.
haha it's crude alright. So, is Google encouraging us to make unique and quality content or increase backlinks??
The illegitimate techniques used by SEO including: - cloaking - hide texts - keyword stuffing - spamdexing - doorway pages - buying links from link farms The legitimate techniques of SEO: - Organized content - Organized links - Good keywords