US Detains Iranians in Iraq

That's us ignoring you, not the other way around. Think about that.

 

Give him some credit...I believe he thinks more than AC or gw..

 

Contrary to you, d16boy that don't think and don't know anything as it is shown in the other thread.

 

You PWNED d16boy in that thread mate, he ain't got anything to say about it.
He fooked up and Bill "Oh No" Reilly is very very disappointed in him.

 

It's difficult to dispute re-writen history.

 

You mean encyclopedia Britannica is re-written history?

Who is your source? Is it your neighbor in the trailer park, excuse me "housing development"?

 

His trailor trash buddys took some time off from stealing to try and find sources, sadly the E kicked in before they had a chance to post any more bollocks.

 

What's with all this house development and trailer crap? Don't you too loons have anything more productive and intelligent to ad to the conversation. I really do not care where it is you live. One of my "trailers" was appraised at 1.2 Mil recently. Far cry from a house development. I like to think of it as an investment.

Now what does this have to do with Iranians and Iraq?

 

I cannot express how elated I am for you Mia, now go outside and empty that chemical toilet will ya.

 

Why? He finds most of his posting materials there.

 

Classic mate!

 

And you still getting your government "pay checks"?

No wonder these Republicans claim all the people on welfare are cheating.

 

While I don't agree with Ags (on many things), I find his behaviour a bit more easy to deal with. We joke around, but the exchanges seem respectful. I'm not sure how serious the exchanges are among others and him, but I wouldn't put him on my ignore list.

I feel that's only used for those that use only snide comments, and pure insults. Those that almost seem to desire conflict. If I could reason with some people I wouldn't ignore them.

 

You are joking right? I find AC a bit more tollerable. At least AC does not have as much of a potty mouth. I'm assuming that was sarcasm?

 

Well not when it comes to me. I find that if I don't insult him, he doesn't insult me. Which is how it should be....I can't say that of AC...as he calls me a nixon lover no-matter how I reason with him.

I'm sure neither of us agree with many of each others ideas...but I wouldn't want it any other way. I actually dislike the idea of being around people that fully agree with me....it makes me feel that either I'm being lazy or they're being lazy. All I ask for is just a little respect....'just a little bit.'

Bad language doesn't bother me. There's a liberal side to me...that's the side that doesn't mind foul language or overly sexual women (to a point). I live in the bay area after all...something liberal has to be influenced into me.

I'm sure he has tug-a-war with some of you...but no insult to either AGS or you...you guys tend to egg each other on. So it's to be expected. I think this board would be really boring if there wasn't some sort of conflict at times...it's just a handful of people take it way overboard. Anything and everything is an insult or a 'holier-than-thou' attitude.

 

While I am against the idea of this escalation it seems unlikely that Congress or the American public which is now against the escalation, will be unable to stop Bush from carrrying it out.

In any case it will be interesting to see what occurs moving forward with regard to the military effort against Iranians and against Shias.

To date during the last 3 years the US military has essentially allowed the Shia death squads and militia free rein and has layed off them. It is probable that Iran has been supporting them.

Shia death squads directly battled American forces and we continuously have allowed them to go free.

Reportedly there could be as many as 60,000 shiite militia in Sadr City--which have largely been untouched by American forces. Of course they have been free to kill Americans in this scenario.

It is likely or probable that the Shia are supported and somewhat aligned to Iran.

Cheney recently visited Saudi Arabia and probably fighting and confronting the Shiites was a big part of the conversation.

Will the Americans take them on? Will the Maliki govt support that?

Big questions.

Meanwhile the Iranians captured in this article were in Kurdish territory and during the American attack Kurdish soldiers and Americans almost started to fight.

F*cking iraq is one big chaotic mess and Bush sent more soldiers to engage in more fighting against all sorts of people....none of whom you'd call 9/11 bombers.

The whole thing seems to be a waste of good American soldiers.

 

So was WWII

 

Yes, we know you are a terrorist appeaser, so what else is new?

 

Detained Iranians had insurgent ties

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070114/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_detained_iranians

 

There you go and there you have it...furthermore, word is that Bush authorized the arrests...this ought to get interesting.