Stick With a Simple or Complex Design?

Discussion in 'AdSense' started by sebastianrs, Jan 5, 2007.

?

What type of design do you use for your AdSense based informational sites?

  1. Simple, plain and CSS based sites with as less graphics as possible.

    14 vote(s)
    70.0%
  2. Graphics-based template site using a big header to draw attention to the menu.

    5 vote(s)
    25.0%
  3. I don't care.

    1 vote(s)
    5.0%
  4. I don't KNOW.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. #1
    I looked through the forums to find a similar thread but I didn't find any. Even the search feature wasn't that successful so I'm trying this.
    I want to know what you think regarding the design of your adsense based article/information sites. Do you think simple, plain and clear sites are more usable or those sites that use those fancy, graphics-driven templates? I personally think, after doing some research, that simple sites with only a small header and more content than graphics are more likely to draw the attention of the visitors to the articles and potentially to the ads. What do you think?

    PS: The poll is not about what you think but what you DO!
     
    sebastianrs, Jan 5, 2007 IP
  2. kalle437

    kalle437 Peon

    Messages:
    283
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    I like simple and plain design with many spaces. That attracts me much more than a flashy site. And at a plain site, you can blend the adsense ads with your content much easier, and it looks much better :)
     
    kalle437, Jan 5, 2007 IP
  3. KC TAN

    KC TAN Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,792
    Likes Received:
    353
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    155
    #3
    Simplicity works well with Adsense.
     
    KC TAN, Jan 5, 2007 IP
  4. darkbreed

    darkbreed Peon

    Messages:
    316
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    I only know how to make really simple sites anyway lol. :)
     
    darkbreed, Jan 5, 2007 IP
  5. slayer

    slayer Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,926
    Likes Received:
    85
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    165
    #5
    you can make simple designs that look very good so i'l go with simple design
     
    slayer, Jan 5, 2007 IP
  6. Pietercornelis

    Pietercornelis Guest

    Messages:
    631
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    I'm only capable of making simple sites, so that's what I do...
     
    Pietercornelis, Jan 5, 2007 IP
  7. Teetster

    Teetster Peon

    Messages:
    179
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    I feel the same way. Its easier on you to maintain a simpler site, and its easier on users to figure it out. There is a reason the super popular sites keep it simple (Google, Digg, etc.) Slashdot put in a wild DHTML content commenting system recently and its horrible. Cross browser support is bad, IE 7 doesn't work, etc.

    Stick to tried and true, simple CSS, HTML and images when needed.

    Take care,

    Brian
     
    Teetster, Jan 5, 2007 IP
  8. sebastianrs

    sebastianrs Active Member

    Messages:
    635
    Likes Received:
    26
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    70
    #8
    So right. Some other example is nytimes.com
    If sites aim to sell services and products, it's just right to use graphics to draw the attention to the products and raise the trustworthiness of the products (see adobe.com).
     
    sebastianrs, Jan 5, 2007 IP
  9. crunchy frog

    crunchy frog Peon

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    DING!DING!DING!DING!DING! We have a winner! :D You only have a few seconds to grab the attention of a visitor. Graphic-heavy sites can take too long to load and sometimes people just click away because they can't wait. Don't waste people's time with your pretty photoshop filler - drive them directly to your content and ads. You'll also save a lot of $ in wasted bandwidth.

    You're better off learning how to properly use white space and color than how to use photoshop to make flashy buttons.
     
    crunchy frog, Jan 6, 2007 IP
    sebastianrs likes this.
  10. sebastianrs

    sebastianrs Active Member

    Messages:
    635
    Likes Received:
    26
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    70
    #10
    Agreed in every single point.

     
    sebastianrs, Jan 6, 2007 IP
  11. Burta

    Burta Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,199
    Likes Received:
    146
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    165
    #11
    I'm all for quick loading and simple looking sites. I mean that doesn't mean it can't have features etc etc - but I think the vast majority of people prefer just a simple looking site that has easy navigation system that gets them the information they want without hurting their eyes. Plus I always try to work with the "KISS" method:

    Keep It Simple Stupid.
     
    Burta, Jan 6, 2007 IP