No answer? Oh, then you must be the one lying, and now you resort to the old "you are doing nothing but signature spamming. Stay on topic please. The previous posts about a lie being the basis for going to war has been proven wrong. AGAIN.
Why is it a lameass statement? 1.2 millions die in road accidents worldwide and it's still around 1.2 millions. It's 1000 times more than your number per year. But you do have a point, each human life is important.
If you were not so busy machine gun spamming Digital Point you would have seen that this question was already answered in this very thread.
I really must move on, educating you is not a high priority for me Son, you are wasting my time, someone else will be kind enough to have patience with you, I don't, I'm sorry!
That is the problem....furthermore, they still haven't answered the question. What is the lie that you are talking about that made the US go to war?? How should it have been fought if it wasn't based on this lie.
Zero. 50% are in reference to how a dead President has come back from the grave. 10% are in reference to how Dick Cheney hit him upside his head with a haliburton briefcase. 10% are in reference to how Bush stole some cans of oil out of his garage. 10% are in reference to his hatred for Christians, ala Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell. The other 20% are mostly disparaging comments about how bad America in general is.
wmd's is the lie. Now you can say that the info we recieved from the cia at the time before the invasion was valid but u cant go to war in a foreign country based on just that info anyways. When they found out it was false info why didnt we just appologize and leaveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Latehorn, your comparing accidents to war deaths???????????????? Come on man, thats standing on shaky grounds at best, at worst its just silly. Latehorn how about posting your newfound opinions on Doctor Mossadegh?
These wmd? These lies? This wmd? Now that you are educated and corrected, will you still continue to lie in regards to these issues? Most liberals do.
Lol! Latehorn has been owning your butt all over the place in that thread! Well done Latehorn, I tip my hat
I guess none of you guys who like sitting in the politics & religion forum actually know tactics.. In fact it sounds like most of you belong on a politically slanted jerry springer. So basically your saying that the war in iraq was waged very well because of the small loss of life on our side. And 3,000 soldiers is very small especially in the current era. The length of the war and its continuation show that the US wasn't particularly successful however. In fact many people seem to be thinking that the war won't be one we can win in the foreseeable future.
GTech the only thing you and the Nixon gang here have is a losing record and one of foolish statements that have not ended even after your sorry asses were and ARE rejected by a landslide in the mid term elections! You are a vain loser GTech and you always will be! You are about as popular as your leader Cheney, I thing maybe one out of ten support him, show some figures GTech since you are so bright, LOL loser!
Question is, is US willing to put American on every city, every intersection in IRAQ? If no, you know the answer. All military men know, don't go to stay, where populace is hostile. THIS IS THE BASIC of all military war manual. When populace is hostile, most effecitve method is Raid. Not setting up camps. War is won by those who are not afraid to die. Is American soldier afraid to die?