Sorry, but that credit goes to Austars. It would not be ethical of me to take credit for his format. Don't forget, blame America first! Boo America! Good news for America means good news for Bush and we can't have that!
Ah, there we go again. Twisting my posts... What I'm finding humorous, and you know it. Is the fact that you think, other countries are starting wars with us.
It's the democrat's tax and spend philosophy that's keeping us in debt? Who originated this "tax and spend philosphy"? Democrats. Therefore, you're saying it's the democrat's fault. You can try to wriggle your way out, what you said was what you said.
Of coarse not. But I'm much more apt to say spending is bigger problem than raising taxes (to a point). Lower spending.. and taxes could be lowered even more. Lowering taxes unfortunately doesn't lower spending. We need a semi-flexible amendment.
"The Blabbering Strategy"! GTech doesn't even know he's using it. 1. Taking one sentence of someone's post and avoiding the rest 2. Blabber nonsense 3. Wait for reply 4. Repeat
I am 100% in agreement with that. If I spend more than I make, it is clear to see that I will be in debt. If I make more, but still keep spending more, I'm still in the same boat.
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/12/21/D8EKPJJ0C.html http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/w...97600&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&pagewanted=print http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/employment/2006-10-31-eic-confidence_x.htm strongest in 2 decades - http://money.cnn.com/2003/10/30/news/economy/gdp/index.htm The list goes on and on.
Now I see how these guys can be confused by news, tv and Alex Jones. They only see and hear what they want to.
Nope, all my posts repond completely to yours. That clearly implies that you blame the democrats for the country's debt. I don't need to explain myself further. It's a quote that is self-explanatory. No, I see what you posted and I responded. You're choosing to avoid and change the point as always.
I have that affect on people... I unlike you and the rest of the lazy angry low IQ toting young white male moonbats is that I do not sit around laying blame on people. That does not fix problems. Once the democrats figure that out, they might find themselves in the White House again... Ooops... There I go, leaking the winning strategies again...
Sorry, the quote is self-explanatory. You can say whatever you want. As I said, I don't need to explain your own words for you.
Prior to the initiation of the new left, and the LBJ era.... taxes primarily came from corporate taxes. They paid for a great deal of our government. The new left and LBJ's new programs caused a dramatic shift in the political paradigm. Along with Nixon's final appeal of killing the gold-standard...America drifted into uncharted territory. Where corporations increasingly involved themselves into politics. Where taxes increasingly shifted to the middle-class. Now this is not to primarily blame corporations. Their burden was becoming far too much...being that spending on social programs rose significantly. This is a structural problem. We're living in a country where everyone wants something, and there's no reasonable limits on those desires. We use to call that limitation the Constitution. The Constitution has been shrink in importance politically and socially, therefore the populace excepts the difference. They're even invested into it. But again, 'you get what you ask for'. I wish I could rub those things out of the past.