9/11 "Truther" gets verbally assaulted by Patridge Family

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by GTech, Dec 17, 2006.

  1. sanlands

    sanlands Active Member

    Messages:
    420
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #101
    Oh yeah, totally ignore the first part. Which says "senior U.S Department of Defense leaders,". You were implying that it was written by some lunatic who was fired. The operation was approved by the Chairman and every single member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

    And I like how you went onto Google to find some article to slap onto your post in order to back your argument and then chose to avoid my response to those articles. :)
     
    sanlands, Jan 2, 2007 IP
  2. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #102
    Well, since I do not have their names I cannot look them up very quickly. Please provide them and I'll happily show you their career path for you too. But, I'm sure, if you were being intellectually honest, you'd look that up yourself and disprove your own theories. But, alas, continue the trip to insanity.

    And I didn't realize the rest of the post MADE a coherent point. Inform me what it was and I'll happily explain it to you.
     
    lorien1973, Jan 2, 2007 IP
  3. sanlands

    sanlands Active Member

    Messages:
    420
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #103
    http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/northwoods.html

    Again, by EVERY single member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. By my count, "every member" of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from the 1960s are pretty much not in office anymore. Go ahead and post "every single" members' career history. It's irrelevant either way...

    Don't worry, I can handle these guys. :)
     
    sanlands, Jan 2, 2007 IP
  4. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #104
    And so, people who are not in office came from the grave to give the plan final approval on 9/11/2001? Is this what you are attempting to convey?
     
    lorien1973, Jan 2, 2007 IP
  5. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #105
    Mia, Jan 2, 2007 IP
  6. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #106
    Mia, you are really spoiling the fun :mad:
     
    lorien1973, Jan 2, 2007 IP
  7. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #107

    See what happens when I take a day off.. Ok, I am going to go back outside and finish taking the Christmas lights down again.:rolleyes:
     
    Mia, Jan 2, 2007 IP
  8. sanlands

    sanlands Active Member

    Messages:
    420
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #108
    Oh no, don't think you can try to avoid the real issue I'm putting up. You sir, are a sneaky man. I don't care about that website's past history. Go ahead and debunk that it wasn't approved by every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

    No, I'm saying if it was approved by the government in the past. Why would it be impossible to consider that they'd do it now.
     
    sanlands, Jan 2, 2007 IP
  9. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #109

    Exactly.




    .....
     
    Mia, Jan 2, 2007 IP
  10. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #110
    Do you understand that its irrelevant who wrote it. You're stuck on some clown in the 60's man. That was 2001.

    You seriously want everyone to believe that Bush came into office, Cheney went digging thru boxes of documents, came across Northwoods and went "Duudddeee, have I got a plan for you!"

    This is what you are trying to convince everyone of. It's ludicruous.
     
    lorien1973, Jan 2, 2007 IP
  11. sanlands

    sanlands Active Member

    Messages:
    420
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #111
    See, you're still trying to avoid the point like all your posts. You sneaky sneaky man. Too bad I've already caught on. My point is that lorien1973 is pulling stuff out of his ass when he said, "it was developed by some guy who left office". I don't care about the website. My point is if you can debunk that Operation Northwoods was approved by every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

    No, I'm proving that you're just pulling stuff out from your ass.

    Why is that so hard to believe? Especially when the Bush family has had bad relationships in the Middle East? Oh wait, just like the Eisenhower, Kennedy and Cuba.
     
    sanlands, Jan 2, 2007 IP
  12. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #112
    There is nothing to avoid. You made a claim, Lorien debunked it, and now you want me to play your game too...

    (private note to those in the know... his, hers.... )

    Mine or Lorien's? Whose ass are we talking about again? Is there something you need me to pull out of yours?

    It's not hard to believe. It's just not true. I tend to not believe things that are not true. Is that hard to believe?

    I was not aware that Bush's family had "bad relationships in the Middle East". I was under the impression they were all cozy with the Saudis... Wait, wasn't Rummy a big buddy (photo op) Saddam hand shaker?
     
    Mia, Jan 2, 2007 IP
  13. sanlands

    sanlands Active Member

    Messages:
    420
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #113
    Hmmm, stop teaming up in a way to try and confuse people. I see how you're filling her place since she became speechless. She debunked nothing, feel free to explain what she debunked.

    Errr, maybe the one who I'm quoting above? Are you incapable of reading other than spouting nonsense?

    Yeah, Bush Sr. had great relationships with Saddam.

    Yeah, it's impossible. There's NO CHANCE that this could have happened.


    Bang bang bang and bang. I shot down everything. Lorien can't even respond now.
     
    sanlands, Jan 2, 2007 IP
  14. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #114
    Re-read the thread. I'm not going to do your work for you. No one is "teaming up" here. It just so happens two people see things differently that one person. I am sure you can find someone else out there who thinks just like you do on the subject too. Don't feel so bad.

    When you post nonsense statements with a source like "whatreallyhappened-dot-com", this is what you can expect.

    He did? Can you site a source for that one, from some place other than whatreallyhappened-dot-com.

    Man, it is the other way around... That is why no one is talking to you about it anymore. Why beat a dead horse? I'm only repsonding to you because I feel sorry for you.
     
    Mia, Jan 2, 2007 IP
  15. sanlands

    sanlands Active Member

    Messages:
    420
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #115
    I like how you're entire argument is based around me using "whatreallyhappened-dot-com" to prove a point. I didn't use it as a source. I used it to have her debunk that every single member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff approved Operation Northwest. Apparently she can't. Please stop spouting nonsense and trying to twist my words. Kthnx.

    Show me. You got none. You failed.
     
    sanlands, Jan 2, 2007 IP
  16. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #116

    If your source is flawed, insent your entire premise as well, assuming it was based solely on that source?

    You take a 30 minute break and think about that.
     
    Mia, Jan 2, 2007 IP
  17. sanlands

    sanlands Active Member

    Messages:
    420
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #117
    Why don't you quote the rest of my post? The third time of posting the same thing over and over to get it through your skull is getting tiresome.
    To simply say it. It's irrelevant where the source came from. What is relevant is her not being able to debunk such a flawed source.

    But so you can stop blabbering about that source. Here's another source.
    http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/
    And another one.
    http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/Northwoods.html
    And another one.
    http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662
    Debunk them. And tell me where lorien1973 debunked my claim.

    Your strategy:
    1. Take a sentence from people's posts
    2. Make a irrelevant claim
    3. Wait for response.
    4. Repeat
     
    sanlands, Jan 2, 2007 IP
  18. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #118
    Northwoods is one of the easiest "mysteries" to debunk from young angry white males with low IQs.

    Last time I debunked AGS over it, he would not retract his statement even though I proved him completely incorrect.

    Seems like deja vu all over again.
     
    GTech, Jan 2, 2007 IP
  19. Mia

    Mia R.I.P. STEVE JOBS

    Messages:
    23,694
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    440
    #119
    If you are tired, stop posting...
     
    Mia, Jan 2, 2007 IP
  20. sanlands

    sanlands Active Member

    Messages:
    420
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #120
    That's all you've got to say?

    Welp, looks like all three of you are speechless now.
     
    sanlands, Jan 2, 2007 IP