9/11 "Truther" gets verbally assaulted by Patridge Family

Given that, admittedly, your site barely puts food on your table, I doubt Gtech is crying about lost traffic

 

I know, I know...anything that puts the troops in a positive light and shows that your terrorist buds can't take them down, despite a huge event like that, well...just phooey!

 

Very true buddy, I make my money from www.mysmartscripts.com

That site of mine www.timetowakeup.net is something I do because I firmly believe that we are all being lied to by people in charge of us. I make nothing off of the site (bar a few dollars a month from PPC ads) but I didn't create that site to make money, it costs literally fook all to run on our dedi server and uses one of my scripts.

You could say it's a labour of love.

 

http://screwloosechange.xbehome.com/fst/FST-D1.pdf
Take a close look on the pictures on page 47-48. There you can see all the wing damage. The missile stuff has been debunked a long time ago on this forum.

By the way. Check the rest of the document, then probably you might improve your conspiracy theory. If you don't like to read, then please watch this 3 hour long 9/11-debunk-movie. It's worth the time, I promise!

 

Thanx for the effort Latehorn, but trying to convice a moonbat that the earth is round is hard enough.

 

Obviously the government approving having plans to hijack planes and commiting acts of terrorism to justify an invasion is definately ridiculous. Especially when such a thing has already been approved before.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

 

Obviously, you haven't read the thread or looked at any of the pictures or evidence. Or read about Northwoods. Or ... well ... thought about it for more than 10 seconds.

 

Alright then, since you've spent so much time "thinking" about Northwoods. Explain yourself.

 

We need more people questioning the events of 9/11 and the direction of this country... the overly patriotic christian conservative scares me more than conspiracy theorist "nutjobs"...

 

Welcome to the Project for a New American Century - http://www.newamericancentury.org/

Wheeee!

 

You mean, like how the plan was trashed? The plan was never seriously discussed, the guy who developed it left office. And that it didn't involve people dying. And has never seen the light of day until those great researhers from loose change dug it up? Like that? Oh wait. I just did.

I agree. People who think the government wants to kill its own people are not scary at all

 

Yes, the plan was never implemented during that time. And? If it was considered in the past I don't see how hard it is to consider that maybe the government did implement it years later for a similar situation?

The plan was proposed by the DOD and the Joint Chiefs of Staff. So much for your, "the guy who developed it left office" that you pulled out from nowhere.

As far as it hadn't seen the light of day... Gee, it was released only 4 years prior to 9/11.

 

not at all.. they aren't in big enough number to affect the outcome of a vote...

 

Don't mention Northwoods sanlands these sheeple like to believe that their precious Government would never do anything to harm their people for political gain.

 

Made public you mean. Before that, it was simply a classified document

I'm curious if you have any actual proof that it was implemented? You DO realize that even the loose change videos do not propose that the plan was implemented. They leave that up to your imagination. They are pretty careful, there. But you chomped that bait pretty easily, didn't you?

Here's some reading for you:
http://www.public-action.com/911/northwds.html

and more:
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/05/is-operation-northwoods-good-comp-for.html

If you care to delve further into insanity. Please let me know.

 

AGS, aren't you the one who left the pentagon plane thread when your sources were thoroughly debunked, with pictures, eye witness accounts, more pictures and uncropped quotes from those on the scene?

 

And that is about all they do.

 

Just remember to check his profile. You'll find all kinds of "posts with
substance"

That is until he leaves the thread.

 

Wait no, go back to your part about "the guy who left office"? Looks like you just spent 10 seconds pulling stuff out from nowhere.

Yeah, I read those articles? One is completely irrelevant to what I'm talking about and the other bases its facts off of the word "holiday". Try harder.

 

The main author, as quoted below, was appointed to NATO in 1962 and thus was no longer part of the US government

Feel free to read his page on wikipedia if you wish to continue this trip into insantiy.