YOu guys are hilarious, comparing Saddam to Bush and Blair. Had you guys seen the footages of all of the atrocities committed by Saddam and his regime, you would never dare to stoop to that level. This is the power of the media, especially the European media bashing Bush and Blair constantly. There was no free media in iraq, so what you guys didn´t see with your own 2 eyes didn´t really happen or matter, right?
Easy, saddam was a terrorist. The difference? Let's turn to Dennis Miller when he notes: That's the difference. saddam was the terrorist that a number of deranged nutjobs are glorifying, Bush is the one that goes after them. Yesterday's message? "The world won't put up with this shit anymore." Next?
Have you dude seen babies got killed by Bush's commands to his soldiers? What about raped women? Oh, don't forget the children also..
Yeah. That memo that bush wrote saying "make sure you kill the babies. oh yeah..rape the women too" man that was a good one
Where are you on the battlefield? What exactly are you contributing that everyone else here isn't? Saddam Hussein was not a terrorist, where do you get your information? It's funny how when Afghani terrorists attack us we get a war in Iraq. =|
Every military campaign see the worst of men come-out. The difference is this is weeded-out by the US military. You get in big-time trouble if you do things like this, because it's not designate as reputable agendas. Saddam intentions were always purely shitty. You sound a bit too bias.
Silly comment. Don't tell me about something you don't have Go read some statistics about headless Bush's brutal actions. I'm not surprised you couldn't think deep on this Just nevermind.. Just keep watching the news from Iraq, you will also see it.
Isn't it typical how all the republicans are just posting one liners or image macros? It's just making you look arrogant. Oh yes, Saddam was a terrorist. Infact, lets rewrite history and say Iraqi's bombed the WTC.
Iraq should have been finished by Bush Sr. Instead his son finished the job. So you´re saying that being a mass murderer is better than being a terrorist? btw, Saddam was a terrorist, he supported terror, most of all financially. Just because he didn´t walk into walmart with a backback full of explosives himself, doesn´t exclude him from that category.
I don't care about the exact command, isn't it he who sent the military there? Yes. So, I just care about the result.
It's funny how some people always spout that out. Smart or stupid as the Iraq war may be, the lack of compliance with UN mandates was actually more than enough to fight a war. While this should have been handled differently quite some time ago, and I'm not a big fan of the war, anyways....I don't rely on the common isolated reasoning.
You better need to straight your facts as well. this was not in reply that saddam was hanged by whom.... it was in reply to this.... So your facts make no sense.....got it? Regards, Adnan Azam
Again, where do you get this from? You just automatically assume it. The UN is all about looks. The war was started because of supposed "weapons of mass-destruction". That was the sole reason. Except there were none.
One of the things I´ve been trying to explain for years, the WMD issue to me was not important, the fact that the guy violated every order, already justified the war. If you have a criminal on parol and he violates parol constantly, you put him back in. For some reason the hatred against America has overtaken how serious the UN should have taken the issue. But oh yeah, the delegates themselves became rich being paid by Saddam. What a sorry ass world we live in. Thank God America is bringing some sort of balance and we have guys like Bush who are not people pleasers like Clinton.
Oh someone talks about UN there, wait, aren't those guys are the ones that didn't take action although Israel used chemical weapons against Lebanon?
Common sense...ha, atleast I don't live in Turkey. That shows a real lack of common sense. lmao. I know,...because his intentions are to kill all the innocent people he can!? Get real, chief. Not a bright guy, imo...but hardly a comparison to Saddam. It was a question. Apparently you don't understand a question. Maybe. I don't deny there's a possiblity in anything.