No-one deserves to be killed. Bush and his fellow people will have to pay for this. And no one will be there for them if there is another sep 11 kind of attack...Its like inviting terror!!!
You suggested that CIA would kill Saddam, without anyone else than CIA knowing that he was dead. Also, Saddam wasn't some unimportant Iraqi carpenter, he had many eyes on him.
Tell that to the families of people that sadam has slaughtered over the years, don't be so naive, if you take someones life you should be prepared to loose your own, some people are beyond help, and defaintely do deserve to die. I don't think that picture on the start of the thread is very fair, sure the Bush idiot is a war mongerer but Blare is doing a good job man, we didn't start this and it's he's under an enormous amount of pressure to perform, even the finest work from the finest craftsmen wouldn't please everybody; it's exactly the same as that, he's got so many people to please he cannot possible please everybody, the same could have been said for our US counterpart if he hadn't started the whole thing in the first place. My 2 pennies .....
Saddam : Dead very disturbing and inhuman. a human killing another human is so wrong no matter what that person did..
I am sure all the kurds he used chemical weapons on will agree with you. Now all we have to do is get rid of, Ahmadinejad, Kim, Putin, Chavez, Assad, Ortega, and whom ever is going to be the French prime minister.
So I guess the time I spent in Northern Iraq burying his victims along with other buddies of mine was for nothing? Hell no! It's a great victory for humanity to see this animal finally get his justice. Too bad it took so long in coming.
Where's Gtech with that list of "democratic" sentators he's talking about? Someone has either been asleep the last 5 years, or is too young to remember how things really happened... sorry for not mulit quoting... Camino seems to have an issue with that button this morning..
These are the same people that believe the likes of Alex Jones and other conspiracy nut jobs. Are you by any chance wearing an alluminum helmet right now? Perhaps an armidillo hat?
Same old boring ignorant comment. If it was not for Tony Blair and George Bush's leadership Saddam would still be murdering more and more people. They knew the war was unpopular and they went ahead with it which is what leadership is taking tough decisions we don't want to take.
Saddam wasn’t really as bad as you all seem to think, much thanks to our less than independent media. People don’t understand that countries like Iraq can’t be run in a 'free' way, without an iron grip, everything falls into chaos and this is exactly what has happened. Infact most Iraqi’s prefer life under Saddam, with him their was a line, if you didn’t cross it, you would be fine. Now Iraqi’s can’t even shop for groceries without the fear of being blown to pieces. There are also come miss-conceptions about this man: 'He used Chemical weapons on his own people' -Actually No, at the time Iraq was at war with Iran and 'Halbaja' is an Iraqi border town with Iran and was hit by accident and infact the missile was headed for Iran. It is important to realise that the west gave him those chemical weapons for the use on Iran. 'He invaded Kuwait for no reason' -Rofl, Infact a few weeks prior to that war, Donald Rumsfeld had visited Saddam in Baghdad and the Saddam unveiled his plans about Kuwait and the US gave him there support. Also Kuwait was originally part of Iraq until they were separated thanks to British colonialism. Why would the US back him to invade, then join in the war against him? Well after the Iran-Iraq war which they supported, they no longer needed Saddam but he still had all these weapons they'd given him and Israeli’s didn’t like this, so he needed to be crippled (by sanctions). So in-effect, they just wanted an excuse and him invading Kuwait sounded great to the ol neo-cons'. In my opinion history will judge this man, a nationalist who wanted the best for his country and ended up paying the price dearly.
If you disagree with a democrat, or terrorist/supporter in your case, you must be a Republican. Now that's an interesting way of thinking.
No improvement? For the fastest growing economy in the world right now, I would say you just might have something there...
More people are dying now than under Saddams rule mate, and with Donkey Bush and his Poodle Blair still in charge it's going to get a lot worse. The invasion was a disaster and has been handled very badly. That is what happens when war mongering fools like Rumsfeld are in charge. He might be gone but it is too late now, the damage has been done.
What is it with your terrorist wannabe's? Aren't you content just being a moonbat? Why on earth would Bush, or any of us in America "pay for this"? The Iraqi people tried Saddam and the Iraqi people put him to death, not the US.
Wake up Mia, we all know the Iraq Government is a pseudo Government, set up by the US and controlled by the US. Stop fooling yourself.