I've been publishing AI-generated informational content exclusively on my website recently. The content is of high quality, including examples and images, and provides value to users. However, it is still AI-generated. My site has experienced fluctuations, both ups and downs, but the overall trend is positive. Given the recent Google core update, how likely is it that my site could suffer a collapse due to the use of AI-generated content?
A well generated content via AI will not be bad for the website, a good prompt to generate good quality content will be acceptable !
When you say recent, when was it? Earlier this year they had an update penalizing AI-generated content. They deem AI-generated content unhelpful / low quality. Seems like you're still doing fine. Interesting.
As long as your AI content is valuable and helpful, Google should be fine with it. Just make sure it’s unique, accurate, and engaging for readers. Good luck!
Yes, but this update is going to be more interesting: the articles that were ranking well now have dropped some positions, and on the contrary, the articles that weren't ranking well are at the top during this update. Let's see what happens next.
Google doesn’t penalize websites for having AI-generated content. In other words, AI content by itself isn’t an issue. However, if you publish AI-generated content as is, without editing or refining it, chances are users will find it boring to read. What’s more, users might realize the content was created by AI and simply leave your website. In that case, such AI content could result in weak user engagement. Over time, this could lead to reduced search traffic, the deindexing of some pages, or even an algorithmic penalty from Google.
I've been working latetly in differents websites with AI-generated content for their blog, using Chat-GPT for the texts and Canva for the AI-generated images. As of now, they keep growing properly. I think it is more about how you use the AI than the fact that your are using AI for the content. This is my personal experience working with Amplia Experience's site.
I also think that AI-generated content itself is not an issue. The main point is to edit and "humanize it". Otherwise, it will inevitably be repetitive, as many people use it to write about similar topics. As such, it doesn't bring any value and that's when Google will penalize it.
Some time ago Google clearly communicated it: it doesn't matter how they are made, the important thing is that they are of quality. -> https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2023/02/google-search-and-ai-content?hl=en In essence, if you pay attention to the ranking factors that have always been more relevant (you can learn more here if you want -> https://www.netstrategy.it/seo/aggiornamento-google-seo-la-guida-completa-agli-algoritmi) in my opinion you are still on the right track, even using AI to generate content.
I have published AI generated content to my site and it got hit please suggest me what I have to recover my game related site?
Even natives don't know the difference between AI and human generated content now. So what is wrong for it as long as it is a very useful content.
The problem is that often the people using the content don't actually know if it's accurate or not. They just want x articles on topic y, they're uneducated on the topic so can't write it, nor edit it. The sad thing is that they probably don't care.
Nowadays, almost everyone uses AI to create their content. The key is to adapt it for human understanding and make it feel natural.
Google’s really leaning into content quality over how it’s made these days. So, AI-generated content can totally rank if it’s helpful, original, and checks all the boxes for E-E-A-T (that stands for expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness). But, just cranking out content for the sake of it? Yeah, that’s a no-go after the updates that went after “scaled content abuse.” The trick is mixing AI’s speed with that human touch. Add your edits, throw in some personal insights, and always fact-check. Keep it legit, and you’re golden.