What you prefer ? Free or Paid Traffic

Both is necessary.

 

Getting the traffic is easy enough actually. What is hard is that most people simply aren't willing to do the work involved.

 

In my opinion both are important.

 

You are right Bro That's why I have hired a SEO Company for the marketing of my website let's see in some weeks the result will out.

 

But google Suspended the Request Index Tool. So the other indexer will work or not

 

I prefer both. Because both are important.

 

But The response rate of twitter is more.

 

Please do share your results with your SEO company. I'll be interested in seeing them.

I don't worry much about SEO myself (and I'm sure a lot of people on here will differ on that). But as far as I'm concerned if you do everything right that SEO part pretty much takes care of itself.

 

I always prefer free traffic.

 

Yes, I will but if that didn't work then what should I do?

 

I have always preferred to generate traffic myself but sometimes it would feel more beneficial to pay for it. The problem with paid traffic is 1. is it targetted? and 2. is it real traffic or bot traffic.

 

The main thing I concentrate on is giving people what they want.

That is high value, extremely useful content. Teach or show them what they want to know and when the search engines see that you're doing that they'll send traffic your way.

 

i prefer free trafic lol . i think that everyone like it most !!

 

As I read the responses to the "free or paid" traffic discussion--I wonder if maybe the better comparison might be "forced or organic" traffic?? Forced traffic of course being usually a PAID product under which the visitor has no real control of being sent to website being advertised--usually thru a redirect from an expired domain,pop window attached to a page they visited, excess search engine/social media traffic purchased wholesale and usually driven direct from source to end site, or any varieties of software generated(bot) traffic or software driven traffic types(push notification/desktop drops/API ads,etc. Then we have the FREE options I have compared as organic we are all familiar with being achieved thru good old fashion hard work and as pointed out by others--not really free but just maybe no dollars exchanging hands to achieve. For myself seems like both are necessary at least at some point and the desired end-game determines the strategic mix. And maybe the desired effect is different at different points thru the process so the mix may be also. While first working on your SEO/SES strategy you might want to include a higher dose of forced advertising to assist with ranking or compensate in the area of engagement til the organic is achieved and can overcome the need for a forced traffic heavy marketing plan. Then of course, there is the whole aspect of the forced organic ad formats being excess traffic from social networks and search engines. This is generally readily available and can be on your page w/in short order. For me; the engagement either thru sales or referrals is the desired result and finding a happy/profitable balance between the 2 is the plan all while keeping in mind both have significance

 

When we talk about organic traffic, you shouldn't exclude visits generated by paid ads.
Paid ads bring visitors to your blog. With relevant content, it is possible to gain the reader's confidence and get him back to your domain the next time or even favorite your blog.

 

I prefer free organic traffic.

 

Despite its matching and diversity, organic and paid traffic aren’t opponents but multipliers of each other.

 

Both are effective well. But I would like to paid prefer most.

 

Nowadays, it has been created that paying and gettting has high quality than in free sources. Most of them believe it so and prefer them. They also have fear to engage in free related sources.

 

Free traffic is good. Paid traffic is necessary.