I'm looking for link building, knowing how to use dead links to build Wikipedia backlinks. Step 1: To Google, use this query: site:wikipedia.org “Keyword” “dead link” Step 2: Create a Wikipedia account Step 3: Edit an article, then insert your Wikipedia backlink Note: Backlink is not going to get approved, if link to your site with poor quality content. How do you think?
really depends on what you have to offer... if your site is about making money, then is a good chance that your wiki page/link will be deleted/removed, etc by a moderator.... if your site is about making money, then you really do not have anything to offer wiki in terms of value.... sometimes you maybe able to get away with it, however, a mod can come along at anytime and take your page/link away...
If you are still able to put your link on Wikipedia. The link will not be considered by Google for your backlink purpose.
Wikipedia links are nofollow which means that link juice is not passed. You may however get a good stream of visitors as just about everyone visits Wikipedia so the benefit is more in focussed visitors than any SE value. That said I suspect Google does look at where you get links from nofollow / dofollow in deciding on your sites overall quality / spam score so it may also have that additional indirect benefit.
I've got backlinks from the Wikipedia by the same way you've described. But there are no any sence to do this - links are nofollow, traffic is very low, so it would be useful only for the whole picture of your backlink profile, no more.
I am not sure about this tactic, sounds like something to be cautious of doing though, minimal reward and questionable methods
If a sites falls under the "money making" niche, then you may as well forget it. You are more likely to get a backlink if you have some sort of education site, other any mod can just as easily remove your link at anytime, so sure, it depends on what type of wasted effort you want to risk, or waste getting a nofollow backlink that may not yield much traffic.
I agree with dscurlock, it would be much better to create an educational site and wait for/seek out legitimate backlinks. And as the saying goes, "If you build it, they will come."
Basically what happens, even if you put a multitude of verifiable sources backing what your amazing article informs the reader of is this. It sits on wiki for about 4 -12 hours till some DB comes along and takes your cleanly edited or updated information and replaces the link with some other POS news site stating "Blog is not a verified source"
Rarely any trube fact on this website, blogs in different niches are much better to read than this stupid site wikipedia, maybe team of Snowden is running this website that's why it gets ranked on Google many times.
Your comment seems to me that you have been successful or otherwise with Wikipedia backlinks and traffic? Can you tell us more