1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

Please Review My Website

Discussion in 'Websites' started by Rembrandt Madera, Jul 16, 2017.

0
Page 2 of 2
  1. Rembrandt Madera

    Rembrandt Madera Greenhorn

    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    #21
    @Smart review

    There's no problem using chrome and firefox on my side. Check the image below.
    It's normal because I am on a shared server.
    The site is new. It's normal there's no site linking to it.
    To use the portfolio slider just scroll down.
    Bold text on my shop looks good and I'm still getting orders.
    You cannot use copy and paste on my website for security purposes.

    [​IMG]
     
    Rembrandt Madera, Jul 23, 2017 IP
  2. Smart review

    Smart review Peon

    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    #22
    Rembrandt,

    • Too many people said you do have errors. If you prefer to stick with your opinion - well, good luck, it's your decision.
    • CPU: sorry for not being clear. I meant your site eats a lop of CPU on the browser's side.
    • "It's normal there's no site linking to it." we have miscommunication here. I meant there's no way to switch from /hashtag-form to the main page of the same site. Being on that page visitor cannot see your portfolio without manual manipulation with links.
    • "You cannot use copy and paste on my website for security purposes" - well, I definitely can, and anyone who knows HTML a bit can do it too, so your protection works against kids only... and from those who might want to copy-n-paste your phone to call you later.
     
    Smart review, Jul 24, 2017 IP
  3. Smart review

    Smart review Peon

    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    #23
    I can even say you what's wrong with the font: [​IMG]
     
    Smart review, Jul 24, 2017 IP
  4. mmerlinn

    mmerlinn Prominent Member

    Messages:
    3,197
    Likes Received:
    818
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    320
    #24
    Loads too damn slow. Why? BECAUSE YOU ARE LOADING ONE HUNDRED AND ELEVEN JAVASCRIPT FILES! Absolutely incredibly UNREAL. All of that handshaking is making the page slower than molasses. Giving your visitors the middle finger will keep your bounce rate high. And that is also why this page is a CPU HOG.

    Further, you never checked your pages for errors >>> https://validator.w3.org/nu/?doc=http://rembrandtmadera.ga/&showsource=yes

    I have seen a lot of horrible coding in the last 50 years, but this is the absolute WORST that I have ever seen. No webpage EVER needs more than THREE javascript files, and personally I think even that is too many. I doubt if @deathshadow has seen anything this bad himself and he is the Master here on DP.
    Rembrant.jpg
    Here is a shot of what I see. Not very good.
     
    mmerlinn, Jul 24, 2017 IP
  5. deathshadow

    deathshadow Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    9,732
    Likes Received:
    1,998
    Best Answers:
    253
    Trophy Points:
    515
    #25
    Actually I've seen worse, but that's not a good thing... this is pretty damned bad. Slow loading, goes full Pakled on the JavaScript, fails to meet even the most basic of accessibility minimums, illegible colour contrasts, fixed metric fonts, broken fixed metric query triggers (whiff whiff... smell something? We'll get to that stench in a moment) massive overuse of whitespace leaving one to wonder just where the **** the content even is, complete lack of logical document structure... and that's just the cursory inspection.

    Pop the bonnet to look at the markup (yes, I can do that, your mental midget scripttard trick wouldn't stop a five year old) and we have such gems as an empty class declaration on the HTML tag, invalid opengraph and facebook declarations (NEITHER or which any LEGITIMATE website needs anyways), that ignorant X-UA compatible bull so common to people wondering why their HTML 3.2 methodology doesn't even work in IE much less a modern browser (If you need that, you probably shouldn't be building websites), outdated charset meta past the reload count, and of course static CSS in the markup...

    that last one defeating the entire reason HTML and CSS are separate and missing caching opportunities -- of course that part of that inlined style is the mind-numbingly idiotic halfwit BULLSHIT known as bootcrap -- well, you're probably gonna need more than a stick to scrape that off with; hope you were wearing over the waist waders when you fell into that steaming pile. Reminds me of an old limerick.

    There once was a man named MacBride, who fell in an outhouse and died. His unfortunate brother fell into the other, and now they're interred side by side.

    See this particular jeweled anal plug: (adding carriage returns to show just HOW stupid it is)

    
<body class="home page-template page-template-100-width page-template-100-width-php page page-id-57
 fusion-image-hovers fusion-body ltr no-tablet-sticky-header no-mobile-sticky-header no-mobile-slidingbar
 mobile-logo-pos-center layout-wide-mode side-header side-header-left menu-text-align-center
 fusion-woo-product-design-clean mobile-menu-design-modern fusion-show-pagination-text">
<div id="wrapper" class=""><div id="home" style="position:relative;top:-1px;"></div>
<div id="side-header-sticky"></div>
<div id="side-header" class="clearfix fusion-mobile-menu-design-modern fusion-sticky-logo-1 fusion-mobile-logo-1 fusion-sticky-menu-1"><div class="side-header-wrapper">
<div class="side-header-content fusion-logo-center fusion-mobile-logo-1">
<div class="fusion-logo" data-margin-top="30px" data-margin-bottom="30px" data-margin-left="0px" data-margin-right="0px"></div></div>
<div class="fusion-main-menu-container fusion-logo-menu-center"><nav class="fusion-main-menu" aria-label="Main Menu">
<ul role="menubar" id="menu-menu-1" class="fusion-menu"><li role="menuitem"  id="menu-item-150"  
class="menu-item menu-item-type-post_type menu-item-object-page menu-item-home current-menu-item page_item page-item-57
current_page_item menu-item-150"  ><a  href="http://rembrandtmadera.ga/" class="fusion-flex-link fusion-flex-column">
<span class="fusion-megamenu-icon"><i class="fa glyphicon fa-home fa-fw"></i></span>
<span class="menu-text">Home</span></a></li>
    Code (markup):
    You don't know what's wrong with that, back the **** away from the keyboard and STOP making websites! The sheer SCALE of incompetance it requires to make a website that vomits up a mess like that? RARELY matched unless someone is intentionally trying to make a bad example like "Every ****ing bootstrap site ever" or "The worst website EVER!"

    As evidenced by the fact that TRAIN WRECK of incompetance is doing the job of:

    
<body>

<div id="top">
	<!-- WHERE'S YOUR STRUCTURAL H1?!? -->
	<ul id="mainMenu">
		<li class="home"><a href="/">Home</a></li>
    Code (markup):
    But of course since you aren't even using numbered headings properly to provide logical document structure, well... For someone claiming to be an SEO expert you appear to not know enough about semantic markup to even flap your gums on the topic. It's almost as if you've deluded yourself into thinking the crap vomited up by turdpress and bootcrap is actually SEO friendly -- big tip, it isn't.

    Much less 958k of markup served for 766 bytes of plaintext? EVEN IF we remove the inlined <style> INEPTITUDE we're talking 22k of markup for less than 1k of plaintext -- There is no other word to describe it given that's 3k to 5k of markup's job. Hell that over 930k of it is inlined style when there's little legitimate reason for ANY website to have more than 48k of CSS per media target? Really herping that derp.

    Pretty big claims made on our website considering you are clearly and obviously talking out your backside on anything website related. The best thing I can say is this scale of ineptitude, incompetence, ignorance, and just plain willful middle finger to accessibility, usability, sustainability, speed, or experience is ENTIRELY inline with what I've come to expect from people who would mix turdpress with bootcrap, and then claim to know something about SEO.

    It hits EVERY mark I usually use as a gauge of how big a sleazy scam artist someone is in terms of web development... though to be frank:

    Says that too... if you threw in "affiliate marketing" you'd have the superfecta for sleazy scam artist bullshit.
     
    deathshadow, Jul 25, 2017 IP
  6. Rembrandt Madera

    Rembrandt Madera Greenhorn

    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    #26
    Rembrandt Madera, Jul 25, 2017 IP
  7. Rembrandt Madera

    Rembrandt Madera Greenhorn

    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    #27
    Rembrandt Madera, Jul 25, 2017 IP
  8. Rembrandt Madera

    Rembrandt Madera Greenhorn

    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    #28
    Rembrandt Madera, Jul 25, 2017 IP
  9. deathshadow

    deathshadow Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    9,732
    Likes Received:
    1,998
    Best Answers:
    253
    Trophy Points:
    515
    #29
    There's a difference? STILL an incompetant train wreck of how NOT to build a website. STILL a multi-megabyte monstrousity crapping all over the markup with <style> and static scripting resulting in a page-load of 1k per BYTE of content. STILL illegible colour contrasts, broken font declarations, goofy inaccessible broken sidebar for navigation that's not even 1440px height friendly...

    ... with the sheer incompetence and ignorance shown in the markup still there in force.

    Again, toss the ENTIRE mess in the trash and start over, you have in excess of 1.6 megabytes of code doing the job of 48k or LESS! -- 97% of the code you have used to build that site belongs in the garbage heap!!!

    If this is how you build websites, please -- for the love of whatever made-up fairy-tale deity you subscribe to --- STOP. At least until you understand what semantic markup, separation of presentation from content, and the accessibility norms as outlined in the WCAG are.

    This is all of the worst aspects of turdpress and bootcrap in one site.... which is why it's agonizingly slow, agonizingly inaccessible, and pretty much screams "**** you" to visitors so far as UX is concerned! There is NOTHING that I would even SUGGEST trying to salvage from this mess; put two torpedoes in it and let it sink to the bottom where it belongs!
     
    deathshadow, Jul 25, 2017 IP
  10. Rembrandt Madera

    Rembrandt Madera Greenhorn

    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    #30
    @deathshadow

    I agree your website load faster than my website, it is because you are using an HTML website.

    Is this your website?

    [​IMG]
     
    Rembrandt Madera, Jul 25, 2017 IP
  11. deathshadow

    deathshadow Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    9,732
    Likes Received:
    1,998
    Best Answers:
    253
    Trophy Points:
    515
    #31
    That's one of many, though that's an older outdated one about older outdated topics.

    http://www.ewiusb.com (actually, this one's even older and starting to rot)
    http://www.cutcodedown.com
    http://www.elementalsjs.com

    Are more "recent" projects with far more frequent updates. The latter two you know... from my signature.

    Though if you WANT to bring my sites into this, might I suggest you read the following articles from my site:
    http://www.cutcodedown.com/article/whats_wrong_with_YOUR_website_index
    http://www.cutcodedown.com/article/HTML_CSS_and_JS_frameworks
    http://www.cutcodedown.com/article/progressive_enhancement
    http://www.cutcodedown.com/article/whats_wrong_with_HTML_5

    Christmas only knows they cover a slew of topics and concepts you clearly have never even HEARD of. Like how to use HTML correctly.

    Oh and "because you are using an HTML website" -- what else would a WEBSITE be built from... and no, that's NOT static HTML files, there is PHP gluing the theme together on the back end -- of all those sites. ALL sites are built with HTML. That's kind of what a website IS... regardless of what mental midgetry you have on the back end -- like turdpress -- vomiting up said code.

    But even setting appearance aside, what you have done on your site warrants NO JavaScript, a fraction the HTML, and a fraction the CSS even without fixing the accessibility woes. Your choice of tools (turdpress, bootcrap, etc) are screwing you hard. Any 'savings' or 'speed increases' you might have deluded yourself into thinking using JavaScript to handle the pageloads may have given you is pissed away on the CSS and that very same scripting.

    Given your current home page, if that were COMPETENTLY coded there is NO reason for the markup of it to be much more than:

    <!DOCTYPE html><html lang="en"><head><meta charset=utf-8">
<meta
	name="viewport"
	content="width=device-width,height=device-height,initial-scale=1"
>
<meta
	name="description"
	content="Meet Rembrandt: Wordpress Developer, Wordpress Designer, Social Media Manager and SEO Specialist FRONT END DESIGNER . WEB GURU . FREELANCER  My Web Design Work  Limited Time Offers"
>
<link
	rel="stylesheet"
	href="template/screen.css"
	media="screen,projection,tv"
>
<link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="Rembrandt Madera - Feed" href="/feed/">
<link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="Rembrandt Madera - Comments Feed" href="/comments/feed/">
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="/favicon.ico">
<link rel="apple-touch-icon" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/logo.png">
<link rel="apple-touch-icon" sizes="72x72" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/logo.png">
<link rel="apple-touch-icon" sizes="144x144" href="/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/logo.png">
<title>Rembrandt Madera - WordPress Web Designer</title>
</head><body>

<div id="top">

	<h1><a href="/">Rembrandt Madera</a></h1>

	<input type="checkbox" id="mainMenuShowHide">
	<label for="mainMenuShowHide"></label>
	<ul id="mainMenu">
		<li class="home"><a href="/">Home</a></li>
		<li class="designs"><a href="/my-web-designs/">Designs</a></li>
		<li class="offers"><a href="/shop/">Offers</a></li>
		<li class="contact"><a href="/contact/">Contact</a></li>
		<li class="facebook"><a href="https://www.facebook.com/groups/475580405947441/">Facebook</a></li>
		<li class="instagram"><a href="https://www.instagram.com/wptechgroup/">Instagram</a></li>
		<li class="twitter"><a href="https://twitter.com/wptechgroup">Twitter</a></li>
		<li class="linkedIn"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/rembrandt-madera-500a2898/">Linkedin</a></li>
		<li class="googlePlus"><a href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/+RembrandtMadera">Google+</a></li>
	</ul>

	<div id="content">

		<div id="spaceWastingWheresTheBeef">
			<h2>
				Meet <b>Rembrandt</b>: WordPress Developer, WordPress Designer, Social Media Manager and SEO Specialist
			</h2>
			<p><strong>FRONT END DESIGNER . WEB GURU . FREELANCER</strong></p>
			<ul class="offers">
				<li><a href="/my-web-designs/">My Web Design Work</a></li>
				<li><a href="/shop/">Limited Time Offers</a></li>
			</ul>
		<!-- spaceWastingWheresTheBeef --></div>

		<div id="quackSeoHoodooBS">
			<img
				src="http://rembrandtmadera.ga/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/partners-logo.png"
				alt="rembrandt madera web developer | rembrandt madera web designer"
				width="743" height="35"
				class="partnersPlate"
			>
			<h2><span class="hash">#HASHTAG</span> TRAFFIC SECRETS</h2>
			<p class="feature">
				<strong>Get Laser-Targeted Social Media Traffic Using The Power Of Hashtags</strong>
			</p><p>
				Get Free Access To This Exclusive Report So You Can Target Your Social Media Traffic!
			</p>
			<a href="/hashtag-form/" class="featureLink">Click To Download For FREE</a>
		<!-- #quackSeoHoodooBS --></div>

		<form method="get" action="http://rembrandtmadera.ga/" id="homeSearch">
			<h2><span>What Service</span> Are You Looking For?</h2>
			<fieldset>
				<label for="homeSearch_term">FIND A SERVICE: eg. 'CUSTOM WEBSITE DESIGN'</label><br>
				<input type="text" value="" name="s" id="homeSearch_term">
				<button type="submit">Search</button>
				<input type="hidden" name="post_type" value="product">
			</fieldset>
		</form>

		<div id="trending">
			<h2>TRENDING SERVICES:</h2>
			<ul>
				<li>WEBSITE MAINTENANCE</li>
				<li>WEBSITE DESIGN</li>
				<li>SEO</li>
				<li>WORDPRESS UPDATE</li>
			</ul>
		<!-- #trending --></div>

		<div id="duped">
			<h2>Duped:</h2>
			<img
				src="http://rembrandtmadera.ga/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/trusted-logo.png"
				alt="rembrandt madera web developer | rembrandt madera web designer"
				width="974" height="35"
			>
		<!-- #duped --></div>

	<!-- #content --></div>

	<div id="footer">
		<hr>
		<a href="#top" title="backToTop" class="backToTop">&#x25B2;</a>
		Copyright RGM &middot; All Rights Reserved.
	<!-- #footer --></div>

<!-- #top --></div>

<script src="scripts/library.js"></script>

</body></html>
    Code (markup):
    Apart from falling for some of the pointless crap in HTML 5, a complete ignorance of how to leverage semantic markup or build a logical document structure, failure to stay away from the garbage that mind-numbingly ignorant CRAP like turdpress dupes you into thinking is HTML, etc, etc...

    NO reason... at all. Even then a LOT of those span I'd axe for being goofy colour changes for no reason other than to make the page harder to honking read, I'd get WAY more content on the home page since it's got a nasty case of "It's a big bun, big fluffy bun, it's a very big bun"

    In terms of JUST CODE in the current version you are vomiting up 1.6 MEBAGYTES spanning 7 files to do the job of 48k in three files. PERIOD. That's 30 times or MORE the total code -- JUST TALKING THE CODE -- that such a simplistic page should even HAVE.

    ... and that's assuming there's scripttardery I'm not seeing because Ghostery told your site to sod off... if not, then there's likely NO legitimate reason for it to break 32k, with 24k being a more realistic estimate.... the home page's markup PLUS the entire sites CSS likely has NO reason to break 24k total between two files... and apart from the smooth scroll back to the top I don't see a damned thing warranting the PRESENCE of JavaScript if the site were built in a sane, rational, and accessible fashion.

    It is a monument to the stupidity of turdpress, bootcrap, and jqueery.
     
    deathshadow, Jul 25, 2017 IP
  12. Rembrandt Madera

    Rembrandt Madera Greenhorn

    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    11
    #32
    Let me hear your opinions! :)
     
    Rembrandt Madera, Jul 26, 2017 IP
Page 2 of 2