'He looks like hell': Donald Trump unloads on Glenn Beck after being accused of voting for Obama

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by qwikad.com, Jan 16, 2016.

  1. billzo

    billzo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    961
    Likes Received:
    278
    Best Answers:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    113
    #461
    Just as expected, Democrats are trying to steal the election and cherry-picking districts to do recounts in Pennsylvania. Also, in Pennsylvania, a whopping 22,000 extra votes went to Hillary as the result of overseas absentee votes (which is odd since the military votes overwhelmingly Republican) and "settled" provisional ballots.

    http://www.phillyvoice.com/trumps-lead-in-pennsylvania-is-shrinking-and-philly-recount-not-in-yet/

    What are provisional ballots in Pennsylvania? Those are ballots cast by people who are unregistered in a district, cannot be "located" in any voter registration books, or do not have valid IDs required of first-time voters. In other words, its ripe for voter fraud.

    http://www.philadelphiavotes.com/en/voters/provisional-ballots

    And there's the issue of dead people voting (Colorado and California), voter registration fraud committed by Democrat front groups (Pennsylvania). So now we know why Democrats are so vehemently opposed to voter ID requirements.

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/03/politics/pennsylvania-voter-registration-forms-fieldworks/

    On November 4, the Delaware County Voter Registration Commission held a hearing to determine whether or not the voter registration forms the county received after the deadline could be considered valid. Delaware County Department of Voter Registration Chief Clerk Mary Jo Headley informed the commission that 3,840 of the forms were invalid for various reasons, including duplicate registration, invalid addresses and other discrepancies.

    Delaware County officials executed a warrant to search FieldWorks' county satellite office, according to court documents.

    County officials cited possible "tampering with public records or information" as the reason for the search. Police noted they would be searching material "relating to identifying co-conspirators," and "any/all voter registration forms, including but not limited to ... any templates (physical or electronic) utilized to construct fraudulent voter registration forms."​

    There were investigations into voter registration fraud by Democrat front groups in multiple states. A search warrant and raid were conducted against that front group in Pennsylvania and another one in Indiana that I am aware of.

    http://denver.cbslocal.com/2016/09/...inds-dead-voters-casting-ballots-in-colorado/

    A CBS4 investigation has found multiple cases of dead men and women voting in Colorado months and in some cases years after their deaths, a revelation that calls into question safeguards designed to prevent such occurrences.

    One of the most glaring cases was that of Sara Sosa in Colorado Springs. She died on Oct. 14, 2009. However, CBS4 uncovered voting records that showed ballots cast for Sosa in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013. Her husband, Miguel, died on Sept. 26, 2008. But CBS4 unearthed records showing that a vote was cast in his name the next year, 2009.

    But the broader question is why Grosso — and dozens of others — were still listed as active voters months and sometimes years after their deaths.
    Voter fraud is real and could make a difference in close elections. This is why Democrats fight tooth and nail against voter ID requirements.

     
    billzo, Dec 5, 2016 IP
    grpaul and jrbiz like this.
  2. jrbiz

    jrbiz Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    6,141
    Likes Received:
    2,653
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    570
    #462
    Of course, that is the real reason (and only reason, in fact) they fight voter ID laws. How can anyone argue, with a straight face, that having to produce an ID will discourage voters from voting? You need an ID to buy liquor or cigarettes or enter any courthouse or federal building (and many other buildings, in fact.) You cannot cash a check without an ID and in many stores, you cannot use a credit card without an ID. Yet, showing that same ID to a poll worker is going to stop someone from voting??? It would be comical if it were not so serious.

    That said, the liberals are really showing their true, cheating colors to everyone with these recount games. I think that this is going to hurt them even more so than they already are hurt by the results of the election.
     
    jrbiz, Dec 5, 2016 IP
    grpaul and billzo like this.
  3. billzo

    billzo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    961
    Likes Received:
    278
    Best Answers:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    113
    #463

    The old Democrat lie was that low income people could not afford IDs. So every state that passed a voter ID requirement offered free IDs to low income people. That completely nullified the Democrats' main argument/lie against voter ID but it didn't matter, liberal judges overturned each and every one of those laws.

    You also need to show valid ID to be admitted to Democrat campaign rallies and the Democratic National Committee gathering every four years. Just shows what hypocrites and frauds those Democrats are to require ID to get into their events but not to vote for them. Or commit voter fraud for them.

    With provisional ballots, in past elections many have been counted without being properly investigated of legitimacy or fraud. The state I live in, people are allowed to "vouch" for up to 15 other people as being legally entitled to vote. In 2008, college students were hitting their maximum of 15 by vouching for immigrants before one poll worker became suspicious and questioned another college student waiting in line who confessed to the scam.

    As I said before, within 24 hours of the polls closing almost 100% of inner city polling districts reported their totals and it was the rural areas that had not. So I find it very strange that Hillary picked up an additional net 2 million votes from Republican country or from military absentee votes.

    Doesn't matter. If you subtracted out the votes of able-bodied people (not disabled people) on Medicaid, food stamps, cash assistance, energy assistance, Section 8 housing and any other public assistance program, Hillary would easily lose 10 million to 20 million votes.

    It's easy to get elected when you give people free stuff to buy votes. I could run for office as a Democrat and promise all sorts of free stuff and get lots of votes, too.

    From 2009:

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB124182750646102435

    On Monday, Nevada officials charged Acorn, its regional director and its Las Vegas field director with submitting thousands of fraudulent voter registration forms last year. Larry Lomax, the registrar of voters in Las Vegas, says he believes 48% of Acorn's forms "are clearly fraudulent." On Thursday, prosecutors in Pittsburgh, Pa., also charged seven Acorn employees with filing hundreds of fraudulent voter registrations before last year's general election.

    Elsewhere, Washington state prosecutors fined Acorn $25,000 after several employees were convicted of voter registration fraud in 2007.​

    Voter fraud? What voter fraud? Democrats say there is none. They wouldn't lie to us, would they?
     
    billzo, Dec 5, 2016 IP
    jrbiz likes this.
  4. qwikad.com

    qwikad.com Illustrious Member Affiliate Manager

    Messages:
    7,280
    Likes Received:
    1,696
    Best Answers:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    475
    #464
    When something silly is being aired on TV I go to Trump's twitter account. Usually the info there is more correct. Or correct, period:

    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/805486509914779649

    "The Green Party just dropped its recount suit in Pennsylvania and is losing votes in Wisconsin recount. Just a Stein scam to raise money!"


     
    qwikad.com, Dec 5, 2016 IP
  5. qwikad.com

    qwikad.com Illustrious Member Affiliate Manager

    Messages:
    7,280
    Likes Received:
    1,696
    Best Answers:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    475
    #465
    Also, it's beyond ridiculous to watch how the media blames Trump for calling the president of Taiwan. Yesterday, while on vacation with my family, I turned on TV and was appalled to see that, first, they are still talking about it and, second, they make it sound like Trump did it. All they have to do is visit his twitter account:

    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/804848711599882240

    "The President of Taiwan CALLED ME today to wish me congratulations on winning the Presidency. Thank you!"

     
    qwikad.com, Dec 5, 2016 IP
    billzo and jrbiz like this.
  6. jrbiz

    jrbiz Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    6,141
    Likes Received:
    2,653
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    570
    #466
    Yesterday, someone sent me a great quote about lying and the truth from Teddy Roosevelt which I paraphrase here: "If you want to make a conservative mad, lie to him. If you want to make a liberal mad, tell him the truth."

    Liberals have problems with the truth in so many ways. And look how badly it fooled them when their fellow liberal pollsters' doctored results convinced them that Hillary was going to win. Now that was hilarious.
     
    jrbiz, Dec 5, 2016 IP
    qwikad.com likes this.
  7. jrbiz

    jrbiz Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    6,141
    Likes Received:
    2,653
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    570
    #467
    I love the fact that he took the call. Great way to let China know that there is a new sheriff in town...
     
    jrbiz, Dec 5, 2016 IP
    qwikad.com likes this.
  8. grpaul

    grpaul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    785
    Likes Received:
    221
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #468
    Sorry to re-post, but stupid people like this speak with a straight face about it all the time.

     
    grpaul, Dec 6, 2016 IP
  9. jrbiz

    jrbiz Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    6,141
    Likes Received:
    2,653
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    570
    #469
    These folks are actually not all stupid. Many of them are evil and are knowingly trying to enable fraud.
     
    jrbiz, Dec 6, 2016 IP
    grpaul likes this.
  10. jrbiz

    jrbiz Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    6,141
    Likes Received:
    2,653
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    570
    #470
    Let's take it a step further and put on display the utter hypocrisy that the left (i.e., the control freaks) will openly exhibit when it comes to the power over others that they so desperately crave. On the one hand, they say that there is no evidence, whatsoever, of voter fraud and, therefore, there is no reason for voter ID laws and it is just an attempt by conservatives to depress the vote. On the other hand, Jill and Hill need millions of dollars to get recounts in a few close states to be sure that there was no fraud and that the integrity of the election is not in question. So, which is it?
     
    jrbiz, Dec 6, 2016 IP
    billzo likes this.
  11. billzo

    billzo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    961
    Likes Received:
    278
    Best Answers:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    113
    #471
    The basic idea is that liberals hate the truth.

    Liberals say there is no voter fraud. When you confront them with news stories showing there is voter fraud, fraudulent registrations by Democrat front groups, or arrests or successful prosecutions for voter fraud, or other voting by ineligible people, liberals will then say, "Well, that fraud is insignificant." But there really is no way of telling how much fraud gets through. They know that.

    Fact is the Democratic Party and liberal left oppose voter ID or any other means of preventing voter fraud because they know that they will benefit from voter fraud.

    And that whole "provisional ballot" thing is ripe for fraud. The poll workers are not thoroughly vetting the voters casting the provisional ballots. Election day voter registration is ripe for fraud, too, as is vouching for other voters.

    Requiring ID to vote does not suppress anyone. It makes it much more difficult if not impossible to commit voter fraud and that is why the Democratic Party and liberal left oppose it so vehemently. When you consider that states offered free IDs to low income voters to nullify the main lie in opposition to voter ID, there is absolutely no reason to not have voter ID requirements to vote.

    http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2016...-votes-being-cast-from-grave-year-after-year/

    A comparison of records by David Goldstein, investigative reporter for CBS2/KCAL9, has revealed hundreds of so-called dead voters in Southern California, a vast majority of them in Los Angeles County.

    Cenkner died in Palmdale in 2003. Despite this, records show that he somehow voted from the grave in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2008 and 2010.

    CBS2 compared millions of voting records from the California Secretary of State’s office with death records from the Social Security Administration and found hundreds of so-called dead voters.
    Nah, no voter fraud at all. Well, it's insignificant. :mad:
     
    Last edited: Dec 6, 2016
    billzo, Dec 6, 2016 IP
    jrbiz and grpaul like this.
  12. qwikad.com

    qwikad.com Illustrious Member Affiliate Manager

    Messages:
    7,280
    Likes Received:
    1,696
    Best Answers:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    475
    #472
    qwikad.com, Dec 8, 2016 IP
    jrbiz and billzo like this.
  13. billzo

    billzo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    961
    Likes Received:
    278
    Best Answers:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    113
    #473
    Donald Trump is a doer, a successful accomplished man unlike Barack Obama who never accomplished a thing in his life. It isn't surprising that Trump would hit the ground running, especially after the disaster Obama has been for nearly 8 years now.
     
    billzo, Dec 8, 2016 IP
    jrbiz likes this.
  14. jrbiz

    jrbiz Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    6,141
    Likes Received:
    2,653
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    570
    #474
    The funniest part of the entire campaign was the lamestream media's attempt to portray Trump as an imbecile or dolt. The fact that he ran circles around the 17 "top shelf" Republican candidates, defeated the "smartest woman in the world" who was the Democratic candidate and brought the top minds of the lamestream press to their knees (and from which they may never recover) was conveniently never pointed out. This guy has been running a multi-billion dollar business successfully for decades and they think that he is nowhere near as smart as a former community activist with zero accomplishments? Here is the best part: he is the first president since I have been following politics (started in the 1970's) who is not obliged to big money donors, lobbyists, wall street types, politicians, etc. Not only is this guy an astute, fast-moving doer, but he has no baggage! No wonder the establishment politicians, the lamestream press, the special interest groups, etc., are so panicked. Their days of free rides at the expense of the country may be coming to an end.
     
    jrbiz, Dec 8, 2016 IP
  15. billzo

    billzo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    961
    Likes Received:
    278
    Best Answers:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    113
    #475
    They are still trying to portray Trump as an imbecile. You should see South Park's portray of Trump this season: a complete imbecile. (I'm watching the season's final episode now and Trump is still a clueless imbecile.)

    Liberals always do that, though. If you want to deport illegal immigrants, put criminals in prison, or stop giving able-bodied welfare recipients who should be working and supporting themselves free stuff, you are stupid. Too bad liberals are too stupid to realize they are the stupid ones. See Jonathan Gruber's quote for proof.


    Trump ran circles around the Republican candidates by being a loud mouth jerk. I didn't like that at all. All of the Republican candidates were successful people. Ben Carson, in particular, was a standout when it comes to success in life.

    What's more, the Republican field of candidates had what the Democrat field did not have: diversity. You know, those Democrats who always accuse Republicans of being racist? We had a female--a former CEO (with a checkered track record) of two large corporations. We had latinos, and a highly successful African-American neurosurgeon and head of the pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins--a very prestigious hospital.

    The Republican field produced tremendous diversity and accomplishment and the Democratic Party field produced nothing at all. Hillary Clinton has absolutely no accomplishments in her life, either.

    Interestingly, I read an article about a Washington DC area Rolls Royce dealership this morning. Turns out that the area surrounding DC has the highest income in the entire nation. And that's the result of government money. Politicians, lobbyists, and government contractors who make big money off of taxpayers.

    Trump received a lot of criticism about his Boeing Tweet and the outrageous cost of developing another Air Force One. However, Trump is exactly right. $4 billion is insane. The $150 million Boeing got to "study" how to develop such a presidential plane is also ridiculous.

    Then in the news this week was a report that the Pentagon wasted $125 billion of taxpayer money. It's ludicrous. The government spending and Democrat vote-buying has to stop.
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2016
    billzo, Dec 8, 2016 IP
    jrbiz likes this.
  16. jrbiz

    jrbiz Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    6,141
    Likes Received:
    2,653
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    570
    #476
    I see it a bit differently. Trump beat them by saying things that needed to be said and by recognizing the anger in the electorate that everyone else missed entirely. Yes, he was loud and obnoxious sometimes, but that was an obvious effort to get the free $1B in media coverage that analysts say he got. The Republican field was indeed accomplished and smart, but when they tried to counter Trump, they all failed miserably. Trump was just a bit smarter at playing a political game that the others had been doing for years/decades but were unable to match his skills at it. And he beat them and Hillary with less money than anyone thought could possibly be done. Remember, low-energy Jeb had $100MM in the bank going into the primaries. Hillary outspent Trump by many hundreds of millions. He has and continues to disrupt the established way of doing things which makes him not only smarter but a real visionary innovator, too.
     
    jrbiz, Dec 8, 2016 IP
    billzo and grpaul like this.
  17. billzo

    billzo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    961
    Likes Received:
    278
    Best Answers:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    113
    #477
    Trump did say things that needed to be said that no other Republican outside of Rush Limbaugh and some other Conservative pundits were saying. However, calling Marco Rubio "Little Marco" is not one of those things that needed to be said. It was belittling and beneath any sort of political contest.

    Trump was a jerk and that turned off a lot of people. It may have been integral to his victory in the Republican primary, but it alienated him from a lot of voters who may have otherwise voted for him.

    Trump may have gotten a lot of media coverage, but none of it was positive and none of it was intended to be positive. It was an anti-Trump smear campaign from start to finish, not the least of which was Democrat front groups sending people to Trump rallies to incite violence and generate bad publicity. Wikileaks revealed that the Democratic Party wanted to build Trump up because they thought he could easily be defeated by Hillary. How wrong they were.

    Even that "Trump grope" thing was plotted by the Democratic Party long before he clinched the Republican nomination. It was a campaign of Democrat dirty tricks and lies from start to finish and the liberal news media was complicit in it.

    https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12803

    From: To: , Date: 2016-05-18 21:40 Subject: RE: need comms approval - craigslist job post
    Yes it is On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:29 PM -0700, "Miranda, Luis"

    <<mailto:>> wrote: As long as all the offensive shit is verbatim I’m fine with it. [SigDems]</>Luis Miranda, Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202-863-8148 –

    <mailto:> - @MiraLuisDC<https://www.twitter.com/MiraLuisDC> From: Freundlich, Christina Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 7:28 PM To: Paustenbach, Mark; Miranda, Luis Cc: Domino, Cate Subject: Re: need comms approval - craigslist job post Bumping this for comms approval please

    On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 7:09 AM -0700, "Freundlich, Christina" <<mailto:>> wrote: Mark and Luis – digital created a fake craigslist jobs post for women who want to apply to jobs one of Trump’s organizations. This will be a microsite and we still need to send it to Perkins. Since we will be pitching this, need your approval please. Thanks

    ---

    Multiple Positions (NYC area) Seeking staff members for multiple positions in a large, New York-based corporation known for its real estate investments, fake universities, steaks, and wine. The boss has very strict standards for female employees, ranging from the women who take lunch orders (must be hot) to the women who oversee multi-million dollar construction projects (must maintain hotness demonstrated at time of hiring).

    Title: Honey Bunch (that’s what the boss will call you) Job requirements:

    * No gaining weight on the job (we’ll take some “before” pictures when you start to use later as evidence)
    * Must be open to public humiliation and open-press workouts if you do gain weight on the job
    * A willingness to evaluate other women’s hotness for the boss’ satisfaction is a plus
    * Should be proficient in lying about age if the boss thinks you’re too old Working mothers not preferred (the boss finds pumping breast milk disgusting, and worries they’re too focused on their children).

    About us: We’re proud to maintain a “fun” and “friendly work environment, where the boss is always available to meet with his employees. Like it or not, he may greet you with a kiss on the lips or grope you under the meeting table. Interested applicants should send resume, cover letter, and headshot to <mailto:>​

    They were plotting that whole "grope" thing months in advance, just like they were plotting to try to get Trump nominated so Hillary could defeat him.

    Which makes Trump's victory all that more sweet! :)
     
    billzo, Dec 8, 2016 IP
    grpaul and jrbiz like this.
  18. jrbiz

    jrbiz Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    6,141
    Likes Received:
    2,653
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    570
    #478
    You won't hear anything about this from the lamestream media or useful idiot liberals who, for decades and decades, have piously intoned complaints about all of the money going into political campaigns and who have tried to enact laws stifling the free speech of donors to stop the trend. But the final numbers are in and include all spending by the campaigns, PAC's, and political committees. Here is the breakdown:

    Clinton Crime Family: $1.2 Billion

    Trump: $600 Million

    It has been a long time since any presidential candidate has only spent $600 Million. This is just one last example of how Trump has outsmarted and disrupted the establishment politicians. What a refreshing change, in fact.
     
    jrbiz, Dec 10, 2016 IP
  19. qwikad.com

    qwikad.com Illustrious Member Affiliate Manager

    Messages:
    7,280
    Likes Received:
    1,696
    Best Answers:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    475
    #479
    What? Trump only spent $600 Million?

    [​IMG]
     
    qwikad.com, Dec 10, 2016 IP
    jrbiz likes this.
  20. jrbiz

    jrbiz Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    6,141
    Likes Received:
    2,653
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    570
    #480
    jrbiz, Dec 10, 2016 IP