Contest $100 Logo Design for a Site. Guaranteed winner by Monday.

http://i1321.photobucket.com/albums/u560/logoesdesign/logo_zpssdtc7ulj.jpg

 

@jnjnnino: Interesting concept. At first I didn't get that the wing was part of the building. It stuck out too much like the letter "L" with goofy feet underneath the eagle.
It has potential, but I don't know really how to communicate what could be made differently.
Also, I'm not a big fan of the two fonts used. It looks too much "fun" and "Playful" versus "professional" and "experienced". But I do wish to keep a san serif font for the TOWN part.

 

@logoesdesign: I don't quite understand what is being communicated with this logo design.
Also, it's too patriotic. I'm not looking for a patriotic/campaign logo. instead I'm looking for something that can be used in the government/municipal sector.

 

@mkels: There are too many colors. I only want to use the two colors mentioned in the design brief.
Also, the letter W reminds me of Wolverine or Edward Scissorhands.

 

Here is my revision:

 

how about my latest revisions? and entries?? feedback on them?

 

@katesrobyn: It's really hard to give you feedback. I gave feedback in #96 and your entry for #99 went in a completely in a different direction.

It seems like the others who are submitting designs are doing these things:
1. Taking my feedback as constructive criticism and tweaking their previous entry to something that goes in the direction of mentioned from the feedback.
2. Reading through the feedback that I've given to other contestants in order to gather more insight and artistic direction.

For example, you'll see that I have mentioned san serif fonts a couple times to other people's comments. And also have mentioned that the logo is for a the municipal/government sector, and that I'd like to shy away from designs that are overly patriotic or which political.

Hope this helps!

 

Appreciate your feedback Sir, Here's another revision.
Hope this doesn't reflect any other brands

 

@LoganK: Interesting concept. The "W" seems agitated since it's reversed italics. The O is goofy with the tail coming out of the left side. It doesn't make sense that the O an the W touch. The W and the N almost touch. And the T and the O have more distance between them. It doesn't make sense to me.

 

@cosmin90: This is looking good. After looking at it for a while, the font for the TO-N part seems to "techie" and it reminds me of the 8-bit video game graphics from the 80s.

Could you try using a similar font to what @kainraziall used in his post at #71. It looks like he's the first to use that font and a couple others have copied that example. That font looks appealing to me because it seems professional.
My computer has a similar font called Heiti TC or Heiti SC.

Maybe also change the "web design" part to a different font too. Something that looks more professional than something that's fun.

 

http://i1321.photobucket.com/albums/u560/logoesdesign/logo_zpsgacvxirb.jpg

 

any feedback here sir?

Thanks!

 

@logoesdesign : I like how clean it looks. But it's too similar to the design that I have in my current logo (circle in a circle that is bottom weighted). I'm looking for something different -- a new brand. A new mark. I don't want to use big buildings / skyscrapers anymore)
Also the "web design" font is too playful. It does not have the professional looking image I'm looking for.

 

@3SS: I'm sorry, I really don't like this one. The red link is thick and heavily waits the logo. it doesn't seem "modern" to me, or give off a professional image.

 

Thanks for the feedback sir - Another try :
I simplified everything.

 

@LoganK: if you see my previous feedback to others, I've mentioned that I like a San serif font.
I think the "O" looks like a shirt button.

 

This looks like a repost. Your designs unfortunate are bouncing all over the area when I give feedback. It seems you don't take the feedback and instead do a 180.

Thanks for the effort.

 

Appreciate your feedback again - here's a revised version with San Serif typeface font :

 

hi, really appreciate your feedback. here's more revision from past comment hope the image is a lot clearer now =)
feedback always welcome!