Yeah, lemme think. Instead of having sitewides go to the listing of directorycontest.com using the sought after keyterm as the anchor text, why not add some hidden text to the directory as well using the same keyterm.
It was clearly stated that ON SITE SEO is not allowed i've just read this post check last lines Amit!!http://www.directorycontest.com/?p=11 Thanks! Saad
ok, got it then why isnt dirave.com instantly removed like me? and why was he given a warning? is that partiality? Anyway i guess i should stop here as mike said iam out without any real reason which everyone knows in this thread Good luck with your unplanned contest, where may be you want the money urgently because of which you may be making new rules lol. And let me go and learn what are meta tags which do not include title, url , anchor but only includes sitewide link lol
There is a big difference between warning someone and warning someone who wilfully chooses to ignore and break the rules.
Mike you again come to the same point, I removed the sitewide link within 1 hour of the post here, and you gave the other guy lot of time, lol please mike get some real reasons
Within a hour of the post that my entry is disqualified because of a sitewide link it was removed and iam not a fool to post in this thread to say i removed it without really removing it. Still i dont get whats ur point. May be you just cant bear my #1 position? or any other reasons too?
It was removed after Mike said that you are *dissqualified* as you are saying in the post above.You should have removed it before... Saad
How can i know about that? and then why did mike warn dirave.com then? Is that a special contestant who gets a warning and time and me direct shot!
Mike I think you didnt paid attention to my blog post. As soon as saadahmed007 notified this on page 3. Just simply under 1 hr Amit removed the link. I have done a sorta case study here. http://www.abhinav.tv/2006/12/14/the-worst-ever-seo-contest-directorycontestcom/ I dont know whats wrong then also. And even if you say so... then I would consider as discrimination with Gii.IN and Romow
You posted yourself in above post That you removed entry once mike dissqualified you anyways Mike posted about onsite seo on 23/11 but you still had sitewide link.. Saad
where did mike give me a warning dude? [when he gave to dirave.com ] Cmon seems you are interested in replying to all the questions i asked to mike. Ok then iam expectng for all the replies i have been asking from page 4 If not then whats the reason for disqualifying my entry.
Ok Saad Do the following thing and make us clear if you are really so much interested. Go to Page 3 and start reading. I hope there u were the one who gave warning to Amit. Nor did Blogmaster or anyone. And well you have been keep saying that Blogmaster said that Amit is disqualified and so on. I hope, Blogmaster as gave warning to dirave.com could have simply gave the warning to Amit too. But didnt. And I hope there wasnt even any requirement for any warning to Amit since as YOU yourself pointed out on page 3 and Amit removed the sidewide link in within 1hr I think as you are also into the contest(Dont worry I am not, but got more information about this contest then you, now I can say for sure) you are simply repling to question yourself where was Mike should be replying. Let me tell you. I hope you were the one who gave warning to Amit on page 3(Check again) and Amit removed the sidewide link in less than 1hr(again saying so you check it again) Read the thread from starting. I didnt saw any disqualification notice from blogmaster till page 6. Then why are you saying Mike made him disqualified and all that. Amit and Mike as I found on DP were good friend themselves. And I hope as dirave.com could have got warning so did Amit(which was not needed since Amit removed link in less then 1 hr!, even mike might not have been online at that point) I hope that makes clear
man i still dont understand where you can see my link , and when i posted here already it was seen by many people that the link was removed. So whats the point in that?
Mike, you did also wrong! you should made also first rule, and you have not even eligible to change the rules, as you didn't told ( or wrote properly when the contest was start ) that! Really thats way your image really going down ! I think you should give one more chance to amit ! but thats all up to you!
Here is something else that might be interesting to some of you: Amit, you have asked me to add you to the list of sponsors with $25.00 Everyone else pledged the minimum amount of $50 (now it's at $100). As I favor I have added you anyways, and you asked to be listed with gii. Now: Sponsors can't participate with the sites that they list on the sponsorship page. Jeff is sponsoring the contest with $1,000.00! He is listing the Aviva Directory as the site he is sponsoring the contest with, and therefor he has entered the contest with Seven Seek. I'm sure he would be all the way up there with Aviva, even without backlinks. Just like Bloggeries. Jamey is sponsoring the contest and all the way up there in the results. He is sponsoring with Bloggeries, so he is not qualified to win any prize money, he just joined for the fun of it to see how far he would be up there in the results.