Then as a journalist you should also know that almost any publicity is good publicity Again I say almost because it can ruin the image for a business but in this case I don't really see any harm done (business wise) to him other than getting more people to talk about him..
Any media exposure is good media exposure. They got it wrong. Anybody who follows up on the article can see Shoe's side of the story on his blog - and just might learn a thing or two while they are there. Listen to the radio show, read the blog, read what he has to say here. He's not a saint, and he's not a villain. He's just a guy like the rest of us working his tail off to make a buck. He's been a valuable member of the community longer than most, and he's one of very few people that has shared his tactics without turning around and trying to sell you an e-book or a "membership" in the next sentence.
"All your saints are sinners" One day Shoe can buy Fortune and fire the reporter..... Turn about is fair play
Umm What I can expect is there will be some more thousands of people go to skirting Google system with this method as advised in Forbes's article for sure.
I like having both nuts, thank you very much. PS. Google can stop this if they want, but they won't, because it makes them too much money.
Yes, Shomeoney might a genuine guy and all, but when one reads that piece they would sure be inclined to think otherwise. They would get the impression he is a bit dodgy.That piece puts him in really bad light. Remember, this isn't mine or the views of anyone else on DP, but the views of a reporter working for a hugely popular publication that will have been read by a lot of people.
I never thought high of shoemoney.com.. Strictly for guys who like to make-the-quick-buck without any sweat..
great news to hear here.oh so that was your name "Jeremy Schoemaker" i was wondering how you got that domain in your mind.
Yep, AdWords and quality score and cloacking is great thing to have The WH meets the BH, just because of these restrictions!