Copy Past Content with use Main Source

I have a blog. If you use copay past content with source. So any problem with google ranking, page rank or keyword ranking or its not allowed. Wait for your valuable comment.
Thanks

 

You can't just copy other peoples content without their permission. Written work is copyrighted - you could be sued

 

Go for it... it's someone else's work, it's duplicated, it's lazy, it's stupid, I have no idea why you think it's a smart idea. But yeah, do it.

 

Thanks for your comment. Ok I will try to write unique article but if I use copy content so any problem?

 

There really needs to be a dislike button for posts like this

 

Nah none at all - everyone loves to read the same articles, authors love writing content just so you can steal it, most of all Google loves straight up copy & paste articles.

 

Try at least to rewrite articles and not to copy them.

 

Okay, I'm a pro at giving tips about this. Here's what you do:
1) Copy past all of the articles to your blog/website. It's a brilliant idea and it's an easy way to fill up your website with content.
2) See you on DigitalPoint in a few weeks/a month asking "what to do?! Google ban me for content I copy-pasted. What to do?"
This plan never fails.

Seriously, do you not think that stealing content is going to be something that is going to get you in trouble?

 

In that case, his next venture will be SEO services! Look forward to that one!

 

Sharing snippets of content from other sites with a link to the source is very common - as in quoting something (or bookmarking sites and social media sites when you post links). Stealing the entire article and pasting it into yours with some intent to rank on the other hand is not your best bet. You might as well just right a bunch of random characters like "ldkfajkladsjfdklafjlkd" if that is your idea of working. Stick with unique content and you'll be on the right track.

 

I can't believe I'm reading something so ridiculous. You my friend are clueless.

 

Hello folks

As i can see digg.com and bookmark4you.com have copied content from other websites and they are fine. But as i can see those sites have link source point to the original content. Then we can say here that duplicate content can't harm your website. Is simple . Just put a source to original site and you are 100% safe.

 

if you use copy data it will not work. Google value only unique and original content.

 

well, I will say Don't copy other content as I will not help you in taking your blog in the ranking, I'll say try writing your own content other than posting some one else content.

 

John

John what you say then about bookmark4you.com they have 15 milion posts, Alexa 9.000 and is fine on Google.

 

LOL. Just... LOL. Total lack of comprehension.

Hope your inbox is huge, for all the DMCAs.

 

Well, I'll say those are bookmarking sites, and recommending the same for blog I'll not do that if that blog was mine. And trust me sooner or later they are going to get slapped.

 

Bookmarking sites don't post the entire content: they post an extract with a link to the original content. They are aggregation sites (sorry, "content curation" sites, as they are now being called) and do well for traffic because they work on a different model to blogs.

How many times do you see Digg (or another bookmarker) come up at the top of a Google search? They don't, because (a) they won't unless they have unique content and (b) they don't need to: the original content ranks, the bookmarking site aggregates so that visitors have one central place to see stuff. They get traffic because they're a launchpad or portal (as it used to be called) - a starting point, not a final destination.

And incidentally, Alexa rank doesn't mean anything apart from a measure of traffic. It does not measure SERP.

And to pre-empt the inevitable "but news sites post copied content" comment that will undoubtedly follow, that's called syndication... and again works on a different model.

 

What I say about these sites to the simple fact that there content posted period are off a social media platform. Google is well aware of social media activities. Google has a unique social media ranking algorithm, completely different from its website algorithm. They base the importance of every post off the users followers, the users activities, the users links and content. They emphasize strictly on the users engagement as the main factor in gaging any particular user before it grades the importance. Some programmers say they can automate all these things Google reads, these programmers are clueless to the fact. Google records that users IP address, it'll find the most active IP address that specific account has logged in on and mark the account for the address with the most logins. Google crawls the persons followers by repeating the same exact steps as mentioned.

The content isn't gauged in the ranking factors whatsoever. The importance of one's account is what rankings Google engages for rankings. As you notice when you see XYZ website ranked and then you see a social media backlink of XYZ website ranked 10 positions down or up. Than you look at that users follower based and engagement of that particular backlink. You then understand that because this user has his past history, engagement, and follower base. Strictly from the fact that Google ranks this users content over other links competing for the same niche/content topic/keyword. Cause the user has content saturation for the keyword, follower base and engagement base greater than the competitors follower base.

So breaking it down. Google doesn't rank it on unique, quality content but ranks it based off of ;
1)Content Topic
2)Follower Base
3)IP Address Of Persons Followers
4)User Engagement
5)Persons Followers User Base
6) Total History Of Engagement
7)Content Topic Saturation Level
sub-rank factors are - posting impressions, posting clicks, posting CTR, Posting Quality.
This is called the Engagement Prominence Indicators.

Next ranking factors for off-page social media rankings or the website being mentioned on the Social media sites, would be all of the above Plus++
1)Impressions (users that see the sites URL)
2)Clicks On The Links (referer social media site)
3)Time On Site from user
4)Users Social Media Importance Score
5)Users followers that click on link (Their Steps 1-4)
6) Users CTR
7)Users Page view stream
8) Users Exit Route (+ for exit from clicking on checkout, affiliate link, other site)

Im done, I hope you get the point. This is to make all you noobs understand why these sites thrive of what you call "Duplicate content sites", big misnomer.

 

Well, @TIEro really appreciated your explanation about it, but could please let me know does this really going to help blogs? I mean if i am having a blog and I keep on posting your content and some others too ... blah.... blah.... Is it going to help me in getting my blog into the ranking ??? I would really appreciate if you can clear me this.