Cycling further reduce pollution and create a healthy body. But cycling is more than 39 minutes for a distance of 14 KM. Motorized add and create ozone pollution is reduced. And the motor is less than 16 minutes for a distance of 14 KM.
It depends why you cycle. If it's purely to reduce pollution then it may not be the most effective stand to take - an electric bike might be more suitable. But if you cycle to combine your 1 hour at the gym with your commute you may find it's very effective.
Studies have shown that it's healthier to cycle through pollution than to drive through it. Hard working lungs expel the toxins while passive lungs let it settle.
but we can't escape from pollution , cycling is good for your body but if we go using bicycle for much distance its wasting your time. so i'm just advice choose the right vehicle for your activity , for health i suggest to eat the healthy food and doing some exercise . be a good person
Of course cycling is better than motor. It has a great benefit as it keeps your body fit. It also doesn't cause any pollution.
In terms of benefits, cycling better than on the motor. It doesn't matter if the journey is longer, which is important to obtain the health body and doesn't harm the environment by means of cycling.
yes, I agree, but the air in a big city so contaminated by pollution from vehicle fumes. whether cycling allowed? Okay, I agree with your opinion. Most major health in our lives
Cycling drives your body to a more healthy lifestyle than driving a motor..If I were to choose between the two, of course, I would prefer Cycling over motor.
If you are fat or wanna get good stomach and stamina, go for cycling otherwise motor vehicle is really good, as fuel gas is cheap in some countries.
i am using my motor since 2003 but now i am thinking to switch to cycling . it will not only cut off my fuel expenses but also gives me alternative to gym.