Does Obama deserve a second term as President ?

Were it not for clueless opinions he wouldnt have any. Perhaps that's one of the reasons we don't let people from other countries form their opinion from halfway across the globe and then participate in our electoral process.

 

Looking at his competition, I would say yes.

 

Oh.... my..... god........ Sitting there watching CNN primetime via cable, and I just witnessed an F'n jackalope. Sasquatch. I just saw Sasquatch. Right there, in front of my eyes, appeared an Obama 2012 commercial. This is California. This late in the election season, it is the very first commercial of it's kind I have seen. To date, not one Romney commercial, not one Obama commercial, but as of today, Obama is officially advertising to prop up his reelection chances in California.

More than anything any poll can tell you, if Obama is wasting money on very expensive advertising time in California, he is in deep deep deep deep crap.

 

Don't give me that crap. My elderly parents and most of my family is without electricity. My brother and two of my cousins had their homes and their cars underwater for two days. People's lives have been destroyed. I can say with absolute clarity that none of us give a flying fuck about politics right now and Gov Christie has said as much.

Why do you show no conscience or morals in using this disaster for political purposes? Don't your own cold words demonize Obama? Is your lack of compassion indicative of the Democratic party? How far does your bigotry extend?

 

If anything, I think Gov. Christie has demonstrated the type of honest and bi-partisan leadership a Romney administration would bring. After four years during which Obama let Texas burn to a cinder without FEMA support, it is nice to see Gov. Christie was able to get Obama to do his job for a change, even if it was a political deathbed repentance.

 

Yes the economy was crap when he took over... and he only made it worse.

 

Any time you show preference to anyone based on the color of their skin is racism.

If I said I was leaving the proceeds of my life to an organization that gave it to white kids but excluded kids that weren't white, would that be racist? Of course it would, because I would be separating kids by race and giving preferential treatment to kids of one color. That is exactly what you are doing. It doesn't matter that the group you are preferential towards is aboriginal. You are still showing favoritism based on race.

Cheering for a US presidential candidate on the grounds he is black is also showing preference to race (aka racism)

Cheering for an aboriginal boxer might be... it all depends on why you are cheering for him. If you cheering for him because you think he's a great boxer, you like him as a person or you just like him, then no it's not racist. If you are cheering for him because he is aboriginal then yes, of course that is racism.

Anytime you give preference to anyone because of skin color is racism.

Your arguments for voting for Obama's are about as solid as Snoop Dogg's:

 

Do any Republicans play with the full deck? Doesn't appear so.

Still Close, Obama still home:

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2012/romney-vs-obama-electoral-map

And I am not alone in supporting Obama. This shows the depth of support for him overseas - your closest allies:

"A seven-country EuroTrack survey released by market research agency YouGov found that Mr Romney is even less popular in Europe than the EU’s austerity measures. If the citizens of Germany, France, Finland, Norway, Denmark, Sweden and the UK could vote in the US election, Mr Romney would receive no more than 10 per cent of the vote."

I guess it will take us a fair while to forgive what Bush did. Nothing personal Mittie.

 

Of course socialist countries aren't going to vote for Romney. By the way, in the US, we don't give a crap how Europe would vote on this.

Bush isn't Mitt. I'm not a Republican

The housing bubble was largely caused by Clinton's unsustainable housing act which made it possible for anyone to buy a house but it also drove prices to unsustainable levels. Bush didn't fix this but it also wasn't all his fault. Clinton had an easy time balancing the budget... anyone would when they steal money from Social Security (well except Obama - he couldn't even balance it while doing that)

Obama is even more fiscally irresponsible than Bush was - and Bush was bad. I have no idea if Mitt can be better but he can't be any worse. At least he shows a history of balanced budgets, something Obama has failed miserably at.

 

Awesome start, now hold that thought and turn it around. No other country in the world wants you interfering in their business either.

Simple stuff hey.

 

I have no problem staying out of the rest of the world's business. Maybe we should have done that in World War II...

 

Good effort. Too bad it's like trying to teach algebra to a chicken.

 

A face to face meeting with someone lecturing me on racism would be a fiery moment indeed.

Awesome news on the US economy:

"Consumer confidence surged in October to its highest level in nearly five years. Americans were encouraged by recent declines in the unemployment rate. And they responded by spending more on cars and trucks, at retail businesses and on goods produced at US factories."

As the US does battle with conditions around the world.

"The reports are rare good news for the world economy, which has weakened because of Europe’s chronic debt crisis and slower growth in emerging markets such as China, India and Brazil."

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/business/w...nomy-a-lift-20121102-28nr5.html#ixzz2B0XATGpI

 

Yes he does, Obama is my favourite president of all time.

 

Let me guess. You would hit them with a racial epithet before hitting them with your purse?

Why?

 

Sort out your own joint, it appears it still needs a lot of work.

http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/black_louisiana_woman_set_on_fire_kkk_written_on_her_car/

 

So shall we take that as a "YES" on both assertions?

 

What a disgrace this is. Looking for balance I decided to look at the Foxnews website and what do I find? Reports of bias everywhere against other media organisations. In horrific news it reports breathlessly "Study shows late night comedians dig more at Romney than all Democrats combined"

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/entertainmen...ey-than-all-democrats-combined/#ixzz2B0x33LSp

The depths this election has reached. Telling jokes about Mr Cartoon Head.

 

What a disgrace this is. Looking for balance I decided to look at the MSNBC website and what do I find? Reports of bias everywhere against Romney!

 

Exactly, that's what I was saying. According to Foxnews, other media organisations are showing bias against Romney. It's on their front page and can't be missed. Dirty low down other media organisations.