hi, This is my new website need suggestion on SEO to get earn via adsense. http://www.xclusiveworld.com I'll be looking forward from you.
I think that the banner that you have going in the header will do well, but I am not so sure about the 3rd column vertical ad, especially because the visual ads are not always relevant. When I just visited the site, it gave me an ad about adsense, and I do not think that is what your site is about. Try putting in a little site summary with a large rectangle or something embedded in the text under the title of the section.
i have changed my ads to text on the right hand side, please have look and let me know is it good enough?
Site looks really good and professionally done! I would move the third column(adsense) to the second sidebar and the links to the third one. Might see some better CTR this way.
Yep, site does look good.. nice and clean.. I would also agree with Mike's comment above about the second sidebar and the links to the third one
That I am. I would change them around and try it out for a while and see if you notice any changes in your click through rate. Should help with your earnings.
ok... it will be harsh!!! are you insane? (tried not to be rude) compare your logo: with this screenshot: have you heard about copyrights? US legislation: using an image that isn't yours = up to $50k in fines
I have to say i really like your ads color combo. It doesn't look like ads at all. Maybe you might switch the middle bar (sort news, login, etc) with your right bar (sponsored links) so they will get in a better spot.
Changed my website template after ad-sense blocked my website, i can create a new account for this website again? i was banned or disable for invalid clicks.
Once you are banned you will remain banned until Google decide to lift your ban. I would not suggest you creating an other account, that'll probably result in a permanent ban. Not talking from experience, just what I have read in the past.
... first, you might try contacting google to inform them you made changes. But, the site I'm seeing is filled with issues that, well... one of the best rules for on-site SEO is to write for people, NOT the engine... another is to use semantic markup saying what things actually are... if the site is accessible, and even functional with CSS turned off, and has a decent code to content ratio, you usually will have little to fear. In this case, the code ALONE is knee deep in sins. Warning, this is going to be a VERY harsh analysis -- even the first LINE of your code, the tranny doctype, is saying that the entire page is built with decade out of style methodologies; literally saying it is in 'transition' from 1997 to 1998. With 140+ validation errors and an equal number of warnings, you do not even HAVE HTML, you have gibberish... a shockingly high amount of gibberish given how ridiculously loose and forgiving a tranny document is. Even more shocking when that's in excess of 1 error per k of code; you've got a massive 81k of HTML to deliver less than 5k of CDATA and maybe 5 or 6 content images -- basically the job of around 10-14k of code. Looking at what the page looks like, and comparing it's ungodly file counts (118 IMG or OBJECT tags? For WHAT?!?), 877+k of javascript bloat for christmas only knows what, (though that's a given once that steaming pile of manure known as jquery is on the table) -- this could be getting slapped down by google on page size (1.2 megabytes uncompressed, half a meg compressed) or file count (84 actual files, >300 file references) alone... because yes, Google is now pimp-slapping websites for being too bloated and too slow. (praise be and glory glory hallelujah!) We dig into this bloated markup, and the reason it's an accessibility train wreck becomes apparent -- paragraphs around non-paragraph elements, double breaks doing paragraphs job, elements that should be headings seeming to have DIV instead, endless pointless wrapping DIV where they aren't needed, an unbelievable 285 separate anchors (it's called link overload, it's a bad thing), lists around things that aren't lists, lack of lists around obvious lists, presentational images in the markup, redundant and pointless title attributes, presentational classes and ID's, zero graceful degradation, clearing breaks and div like it's still 2001, inline level tags wrapping block level tags, pointless comments placed in a manner that's known to trip rendering bugs in FF and IE (yes, I said comments), non-breaking spaces doing padding and/or lists' job, absolute URL's where they are nothing but code bloat, DIV around IMG tags for no good reason (particularly if they're inside a paragraph), presentational style in the markup -- you'd almost think this was a stock turdpress or boomla template. As I tell many people, I'd have to throw it all away and start over clean to even attempt to fix that -- and that's EXACTLY what I suggest you do. There is NOTHING on that page worth even trying to save from an accessibility, maintainability or deployability point of view. In doing so I would suggest learning more about semantic markup, separation of presentation from content, and a host of other modern development techniques from this decade, instead of methodologies that really should have been left in the `90's... and at the same time back the devil away from all that endless javascript for nothing garbage -- as cool as all that social networking stuff is, when it's suddenly 2/3rd's your page size, it's time to flush it. But then, I still set up acceptable restrictions for my pages... something I suggest most people do; I consider the ideal target for a page on a website to be 72k in 16 or less files, with 144k in 24 files being the upper limit unless it's something like a gallery page. You're at eight to ten times that, and for what? 5k of plaintext?