Do Directories Accept The Sites Without Content?

Do Directories Accept The Sites Without Content? What They Consider To Accept Or Reject The Sites?

 

Ofcourse..Good Directories will not accept that site.They do check your sites and they never accept MFA etc...
Saad

 

Content is King!
You may fnd directories that accept whatever, however good directories will refuse these types of submissions.

 

Sites without content? Like new or under-construction sites? If that is the question, I would think almost no directory would list those.

 

Every quality directory provide submission guide lines on Submit A Site page, and there is clearly mentioned that "Sites with poor contents/without contents are not allowed" or something like this.

So good directories will surely reject sites without content.

 

Reputable directories that screen new web sites will most likely not accept a web site without content for obvious reasons.

 

Exactly! How do we know this new website that has no content, that the owner won't put a porn site on it next week? A site has to be fully developed for the vast majority of directories to even consider listing it.

 

No kidding, then again, there is a danger even when the site has something on it.

 

definitely the answer is no

 

no. I simply reject them. If submissions are paid I issue refunds.

 

I'd agree with this angle. It's not a matter of 1 or 2 or even a handful not adding a site without content. It's almost every directory.

There are some that do not check and others that have auto-addition, so these sorts of directories do accept no-content sites. However, they are very few and far between.

 

I only accept sites under construction that have a link to their old sites content, and what PP said is all true, careful guys sometimes there are some very sneaky submitters

 

Why would a directory list a site with no content?

 

Why would anyone want to visit a site with no content?

So, why would you expect anyone to add a link to it?

 

They simply reject such sites. Please keep in mind that the Content is always KING.

 

what kind of content do you mean? any content at all? text content? original content?

 

Depends on the owner.

If i know it's say... Someone like (in no particular order) onlinedude, mystikmedia, britishguy, blogmaster, PortProphecy, irka etc etc.. yep, I'd definately accept it because I know they'd be working on it night and day.

 

Many businesses on the web have simple brochure sites that really don't have a whole lot of content other than announcing that they exist and offer some service or product. I will list them if the business is legitimate and the site is complete (no missing/under construction pages).

 

I wouldn't want to be listed in a directory that accepts sites without contest or spam content.

 

It beats the purpose of having quality when you don't have content. Qualilty content is very important.