Thought I'd get this started with 2 things I've been doing to grow new sites. 1. Use RSS feeds from Twitter/Facebook to constantly post new threads/posts in a subforum. Give Google your sitemaps. Twitter/Facebook content/users are not being indexed on Google. Given that, it's your duty to do it. What is your new forum-based site? Categorizing social media. That is how you are legit. 2. Google+ SEO. You can auto post to Google Profiles using THIS technique: http://google-plus.com/2053/how-to-post-to-google-using-email-or-gmail-you-can-post-to-public-circles-extended-circles-etc/ Basically, you Automate this using a RSS to Email through SMTP. This will auto-post an RSS feed to your Google+ profile. Given the image below, I believe you will see how it will be lucrative to have a Google+ profile that has a lot of content (there is a greater chance for Google to list you on the Search Engine). Elaborating more on topic 1. A website is popular based on the Quality or Quantity of the content. Google is not indexing Twitter & Facebook. If you provide your site with automated RSS feeds connected to Google Search through Sitemaps, you will gain traffic that you otherwise wouldn't. My spreadsheet is @ rss.r-shief.org How to Video (in vbulletin but it's the same concept with Xenforo, Wordpress, etc). You just need to keep an eye on your categorization. http://youtu.be/FRhFPzbpqOA Webmaster Tools
I gave you an example, it's just tough for many to understand. You locate social network users / pages. You locate their RSS feed. You set up the RSS feed to auto-post threads in a specific sub-forum. You give Google Webmaster tools the sitemaps from your site. The RSS feeds populate your site with content which in-turn generates hits from Google Search. You are basically categorizing social network content and re-posting it.
And your site will be smashed by Google Panda - this is nothing new... Naming it like that wont make a bees dick of difference - it is what it is - spam!
To Google, it's all original content since they don't index Twitter nor Facebook. "Google Panda" is not able to say "hey this is not original content" when there is absolutely no content in their search index from Facebook or Twitter. So, you confirmed jelly.
Well that's news to me... when did they get banned? Your site will still get de-indexed and banned... and it wont be useful for your visitors - hence it's shit. I'm not Jelly - I just got 1000 visitors in the last hour... more than your complete days work of spam.
Google doesn't have access to Twitter and Facebook data. Just because you don't know that doesn't mean you should come in here acting like a child about your pitiful 1,000 visitor traffic. The "rel=nofollow" tag refers to Google indexing (or in this case, not indexing) .... That's why Facebook's data is integrated into Bing and not Google. Same with Twitter not being indexed. If you are looking for a "who has the most traffic right this second" I would sit this one out if I were you. I own (not lease) my hardware and am obviously more knowledgeable.
About 1,930,000,000 results (0.06 seconds) for site:Twitter.com - http://www.google.com.au/search?q=site:twitter.com Soooo yes it does get indexed... your method is spam and it is shit... and it's teaching these other fools to be lazy. There's no skin up my nose actually, all it means is that there's less competition and more webmasters wasting their time on this junk. My pitiful 1000 visits within an hour is more than your daily traffic - and it's taken you 6 months to get there (or more)... it's taken me two months.
You may want to take a look at my personal site if you think you can flop weiners on the table. You may also want to read my first post where I said "to grow new sites." If your site is over 6 months old, than it isn't a new site that needs growth. hxxp://www.fohguild.org/forums/ Sit down bro. Those are users, not their content, you are still wrong. You are also 100% out of touch with the internet when it comes to Google Search and Twitter. You should read some articles to better inform yourself. You are obviously upset. It's okay to be.
I agree with you. He is an idiot trying to teach his BS SPAM methods to the world. Way to contribute to a better internet huh...? aside from the fact that he sucks for teaching people how to spam, just like you said, do a search for site:twitter.com and it pulls up a list that he say's is user accounts but if you take one of those URL's and do another search for cache:twiter.com/useraccountexample it shows a cached page. No worries, people here are not that stupid to try his spammy BS. People are starting to get the point that duplicate content is not the way to go and Google is putting a stop to it. Actually, maybe you should...
Both of you are 100% incorrect. This quote is from Eric Schmidt, Executive of Google. Twitter and Facebook ARE NOT crawled by Google. So given that Google DOES NOT CRAWL TWITTER AND FACEBOOK you can re-post their content and collect. Come at me.
Nice server... but that just proves the fact that you are getting mad bro - when you are trying to pull out the big guns. But dude... you have just over 1k visitors per day - that's nothing. Especially over a 6 month period of building. No matter what spin you put on it... not many visitors are going to appreciate the content when they find it. Twitter is also heavily crawled by bots and users such as yourself - hence when 10s of 1000s of webmasters are doing the same thing as yourself - then you all have duplicate content. Last of all... some assholes here will report your site to Google...
Thsadmin, Instead of blabbing incoherently to prove some kind of point about spamming, you need to realize that categorizing all this social chatter is not a bad thing. You arrive in my thread trying to come at me, when you need to realize that doing what I described builds a web property from scratch NOT ONLY to gain "just over 1k visitors a day." But it's not just the traffic you gain, it's the web property. So doing what I described above, I am able to do this: 741,379 tweets from #SOPA 11/17 to 1/17: hXXp://www.r-shief.org/csv/shared/SOPA-raw_2011-11-17_to_2012-01-17.csv.gz 325,940 tweets from #SOPA 1/18 hXXp://www.r-shief.org/csv/shared/SOPA-raw_2012-01-18_to_2012-01-19.csv.gz
Point being, when you have a lot of data, step 2 for your web property is to analyze it. So from start to finish I just described how to create a web property for data analysis. You are welcome.
Nice tips, the social networks it seems is where the search engines are targetting relevancy these days