Feedback Infraction Hunting Over-Zealous Moderator

Discussion in 'Support & Feedback' started by Jetheat, Jan 3, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. #1
    Who's the over-zealous mod on this forum that is out with a vengeance checking and double checking all details of all my posts whether they be new or very old?

    In one day alone, I got 3 infractions.

    If I had more posts, I'm sure I'd be banned instantly because of this hunter.

    Why do some mods have so much spite that they love to give infraction points like candy?

    Is it the feeling over power going to his head or is he a schoolkid with the feeling of responsibility.

    Even this post here will piss him off and cost me an infraction point.

    The joy of using this forum is lost with these snipers out and about.

    There are no warnings or anything. Its an infraction point and then a search on all your previous posts, even if they are a year or two old.

    I can't even post a genuine link in this forum anymore without being accused of something or another.

    Any and every excuse has been made with almost every single one of my posts to give me an infraction point.

    This makes it very difficult to even post something completely genuine when people are hunting all of your posts.

    This is starting to suck.

    JH
     
    Jetheat, Jan 3, 2012 IP
    MarTh- likes this.
  2. browntwn

    browntwn Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    8,347
    Likes Received:
    848
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    435
    #2
    Infractions are warnings ... instead of just banning people. :)
     
    browntwn, Jan 3, 2012 IP
  3. Jetheat

    Jetheat Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    260
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #3
    Warnings several of them at once leads to a fairly quick ban.

    I got 3 today coz he scanned all the posts Ive made in the past, and dug out older posts. Do you think that's a friendly warning or malice?

    JH
     
    Jetheat, Jan 3, 2012 IP
  4. browntwn

    browntwn Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    8,347
    Likes Received:
    848
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    435
    #4
    You get 10 so a mild warning considering you get 7 more before anything other than a warning actually happens.

    Also, might not be a mod after you but rather other members flagging your posts and the mods just responding as the reported posts come in.
     
    browntwn, Jan 3, 2012 IP
  5. Cucumba123

    Cucumba123 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,403
    Likes Received:
    34
    Best Answers:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    150
    #5
    You gotta deal with it, this is DP and there are too many scumbags over here.
     
    Cucumba123, Jan 4, 2012 IP
  6. sarahk

    sarahk iTamer Staff

    Messages:
    28,818
    Likes Received:
    4,536
    Best Answers:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    665
    #6
    It's not unusual to have an "account review" when a serious problem is identified when experience tells us it is likely that there will be more problems.

    For example: a user who has posted "PM Sent" once is likely to have done it on other threads.
     
    sarahk, Jan 6, 2012 IP
  7. Cucumba123

    Cucumba123 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,403
    Likes Received:
    34
    Best Answers:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    150
    #7
    Yepp and if a new user goes in and posts "PM Sent" 10 times then you don't warn him once, not even 5 times but 10 times, INSTANT BAN. Retarded. Refer to my previous statement.
     
    Cucumba123, Jan 6, 2012 IP
  8. sarahk

    sarahk iTamer Staff

    Messages:
    28,818
    Likes Received:
    4,536
    Best Answers:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    665
    #8
    Did I say 10 infractions would be given?
    In some cases a user might if we could see that a deliberate attempt to cheat was made (eg fake signatures, duplicate threads, cookie stuffing). However if it was likely the user was unaware of the rules then maybe one more might be given.
     
    sarahk, Jan 6, 2012 IP
  9. Jetheat

    Jetheat Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    260
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #9
    Another infraction today with my very next post. Do you see how this over-zealous 'out for glory' mod is checking and scrutinizing every post I make?

    I can't catch a break.
     
    Jetheat, Jan 6, 2012 IP
  10. Wulkanen

    Wulkanen Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,429
    Likes Received:
    47
    Best Answers:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    175
    #10
    It might be a DP member who doesn't like you and is reporting every little mistake he see.
    But that's just a wild guess.

    What were you posting about that got you an infraction?
     
    Wulkanen, Jan 6, 2012 IP
  11. robjones

    robjones Notable Member

    Messages:
    4,256
    Likes Received:
    405
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    290
    #11
    You appear to be manufacturing your own bad breaks.

    For example this thread is created to whine about infractions. You've been here since 2005 so you know that's against guideline. Yet in a flash of brilliance you add "Even this post here will piss him off and cost me an infraction point."

    Gee... who knew ignoring guidelines might lead to infractions? Thanks for the educational moment.
     
    robjones, Jan 6, 2012 IP
  12. sarahk

    sarahk iTamer Staff

    Messages:
    28,818
    Likes Received:
    4,536
    Best Answers:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    665
    #12
    This is how it panned out, since you appear eager to have your laundry aired...

    • I got up this morning & it was raining so I bailed on my planned mountain bike ride. I'm already at my computer checking the rain radars so I decide to check the reported posts that have come overnight (NZ time)
    • One report points out that your links are redirects and tells me what to look for.
    • I visit the thread and see that your links are formatted site-name.com but redirect to sitename.com.
    • Infraction given and thread deleted.
    • the tactic showed a degree of forethought so I visit your profile and see you've had an infraction for this before and also find this thread. Therefore the report might have been from someone "stalking" you but the moderators are not.
    Now for the Glory
    i don't get paid
    I don't get any recognition for volume or quality of mod actions
    i do get grumped at for being online all the time

    Ummm where was the glory?
     
    sarahk, Jan 6, 2012 IP
    The Webby likes this.
  13. ~~~~

    ~~~~ Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,875
    Likes Received:
    70
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    175
    #13
    @JH,
    Mods have 100's of threads to check everyday, they don't see the start date or post date, of course something that deserves an infraction gets it.
    Move on, it'll expire with time, the more you whine, the better it gets on the bad side!
     
    ~~~~, Jan 6, 2012 IP
  14. dlatua

    dlatua Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,985
    Likes Received:
    65
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    235
    #14
    ^^
    Moderators may have even 1 million posts to check, this isn't an excuse. It was their.choice to be moderators. They have to double check anything before they make a decision.
    BTW, they have to see when the thread was created.
     
    dlatua, Jan 7, 2012 IP
  15. ~~~~

    ~~~~ Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,875
    Likes Received:
    70
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    175
    #15
    This is what was posted by a mod herself on some thread (I can't find a link)
    "We have 100's of reports daily, and often the dates aren't viewed so infractions are awarded even for posts that are ancient"
    (Those aren't the exact wordings, but that's what the mod said over there)
     
    ~~~~, Jan 7, 2012 IP
  16. dlatua

    dlatua Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,985
    Likes Received:
    65
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    235
    #16
    It doesn't matter who said that, when you have the right to judge someone than do it correctly, if you don't have time to do (what you wanted to do), than it is your own problem. (by "you" I mean a mod)
     
    dlatua, Jan 7, 2012 IP
  17. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,334
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #17
    The post date/time is mostly irrelevant. There is no statute of limitations for people violating rules.
     
    digitalpoint, Jan 7, 2012 IP
  18. K.Meier

    K.Meier Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    281
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #18
    I have to 2nd the OPs issue. Exact same happened to me as explain in my thread.

    Very odd that since asking about infractions I suddenly get infractions for year old honest mistakes.
    I thought infractions are suppose to keep "bad" users out that currently harm the forum, instead of messing around with loyal-honest users and going over year old mistakes.

    Currently it feels like I'm being up for trial and every single post is being reviewed over every possible mistake I could have made and that only started after I created a thread in the Feedback & Suggestion area.
    It just seems you have to lay low and not ask anything, once you expose yourself to the head of the forum, you're being investigated. Strange community managing behavior for a US based Forum. I'd understand if it would be a Chinese/North Korean forum. But hey, after all DP seems to be successful so it's not all bad here ;)
     
    K.Meier, Jan 7, 2012 IP
  19. Jetheat

    Jetheat Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    260
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #19
    That may be true but it shows the lengths mods go to sniff out all previous posts and then check each of them for infractions just because a person committed an infraction today.

    I've had 2 year old posts checked and infracted on a day when I had a current day post infracted along with several other older posts.

    So although the time issue is no issue for mods, what do you think of spite and the general feeling of the forum.

    If you were posting on some other forum and some mod over there continues to sniff out your posts and give you an infraction, would you still feel the same affinity for the that forum as you did in the beginning?

    We're not talking about rules here. We're talking about the social standing of this forum.

    @k.meier - I feel for you. This is the exact thing that has happened to me and many others. I'm starting to see 3 year old posts also talking about over-zealous moderators. They used exactly the same words I used to describe the infraction hunting mods. How about that for ESP!

    JH
     
    Jetheat, Jan 7, 2012 IP
  20. digitalpoint

    digitalpoint Overlord of no one Staff

    Messages:
    38,334
    Likes Received:
    2,613
    Best Answers:
    462
    Trophy Points:
    710
    Digital Goods:
    29
    #20
    It's pretty common that if someone breaks 1 rule and gets an infraction, there is a good chance they broke other rules.

    Are you suggesting that someone getting an infraction should be automatically shielded from a moderator looking to see if they broke other rules?
     
    digitalpoint, Jan 8, 2012 IP
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.