Attack on Pakistan army

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by laceybeautiful, Nov 29, 2011.

  1. #1
    Few days back, Nato alliance Killed 26 Pakistani army Soldiers via helicopter shelling.
    In return, Pakistan cut Nato supply line and American soldier airbase in Baluchistan, Pakistan.
    What do you think America and Nato want to start another war?

    :confused:
     
    laceybeautiful, Nov 29, 2011 IP
  2. ApocalypseXL

    ApocalypseXL Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,095
    Likes Received:
    103
    Best Answers:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #2
    You'd have to be insane to wish a war against NATO .
     
    ApocalypseXL, Nov 29, 2011 IP
  3. laceybeautiful

    laceybeautiful Peon

    Messages:
    1,125
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    I think, in today modern war block.
    Pakistan not join any kind of alliance, according to new situation.
    Pakistan must join China, and Russia block because Pakistan cannot beat Nato alone.
     
    laceybeautiful, Nov 29, 2011 IP
  4. ApocalypseXL

    ApocalypseXL Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,095
    Likes Received:
    103
    Best Answers:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #4
    LOL the NATO combined might surpasses the one of China , Russia and India combined and that's only in terms of manpower . In terms of technology Russia is a decade behind , China is 20 years behind and India even more . Also China , Russia and India have a economic system that survives by sucking money from the NATO countries.

    The only country that can have a word is Russia since they are quite self sufficient , in the event of a war they would not grow but they would not collapse . The trick is that Russia just loves islamists especially after the terror attacks in the past decade , so don't count on them to show up . China can't live without exposring things to the US and EU so they might make some noise but they certainly won't come guns blazing . In the event of a war the only support will come from Iran . Everyone else will be busy doing business with the NATO countries .
     
    ApocalypseXL, Nov 29, 2011 IP
  5. laceybeautiful

    laceybeautiful Peon

    Messages:
    1,125
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    HahahaHa,

    business and war totally different things. if Nato start war in Pakistan. China support Pakistan Chinese prime minister already said.
    Anyway, Beat Pakistan is not like a loly pop.
    You know that Pakistan in the list of Strongest army and Atom bomb.
     
    laceybeautiful, Nov 29, 2011 IP
  6. ApocalypseXL

    ApocalypseXL Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,095
    Likes Received:
    103
    Best Answers:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #6
    LOL All it takes is some spirits and indians and you're CNC will be gone and if China suports you that makes it even better that means we don't have to pay them back ;)
     
    ApocalypseXL, Nov 29, 2011 IP
  7. Obamanation

    Obamanation Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    8,016
    Likes Received:
    237
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #7
    Don't think so. War costs money. US owes China over 3 (T)rillion dollars. In the event of war, we would probably just wipe that debt from the books, which would set China's economy and war machine back a century. China is aware of that, so while it's nice to have rogue states like N. Korea and Pakistan around to cause the US trouble, a real conflict seems highly unlikely. For better or worse, the US and China are business partners and will remain so.


    Yah, but when you are being taken apart by airstrikes launched from carrier battle groups, who are you going to nuke? Yourself? Afghanistan? You can't even reach Israel with those nukes, no less the US. The US could bomb Pakistan [further] back into the stone age without the first concern about a nuclear strike.

    Of course this whole discussion is stupid since Pakistan has already admitted to firing the first shots that created the airstrike.

     
    Obamanation, Nov 29, 2011 IP
  8. The Webby

    The Webby Peon

    Messages:
    1,852
    Likes Received:
    30
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8

    You are offending Pakistanis by suggesting they will need to seek help from India, they'd rather die a slow and painful death than to see India coming to their rescue.

    And your analysis is way off anyway.
    Russia has no interest in Pakistan. India is an ally of multiple NATO countries (Almost all the major one).
    Get out of your shell, it aint 1990 anymore. There are way too many financial interests involved, enough to prevent a direct conflict between Russia, China, India and NATO countries.
     
    The Webby, Nov 29, 2011 IP
  9. pupul

    pupul Prominent Member

    Messages:
    1,737
    Likes Received:
    66
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    340
    #9
    Why India will support in war? Instead of war think about development.
    If you have more money to waste on wars, then why don't you feed the poors with that money.
     
    pupul, Nov 29, 2011 IP
  10. ApocalypseXL

    ApocalypseXL Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,095
    Likes Received:
    103
    Best Answers:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #10
    Spare me the nationalism Helvetii . The analysis was just giving Pakistan a best case scenario and even then they would have lost .

    @pupul : spirits and indians are just codewords for two weapons . I doubt the OP has any idea they exist so why enlighten a potential enemy ?

    Also why should I feed those that where to stupid to use contraception ? If you're so compassionate why are you using the Internet instead of helping the poor get food ?
     
    ApocalypseXL, Nov 29, 2011 IP
  11. pupul

    pupul Prominent Member

    Messages:
    1,737
    Likes Received:
    66
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    340
    #11
    Why need a war? Think about development.
    You won't get anything from war. War will destroy all.
    Love people.
     
    pupul, Nov 29, 2011 IP
    Digital Veer likes this.
  12. pupul

    pupul Prominent Member

    Messages:
    1,737
    Likes Received:
    66
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    340
    #12
    I use internet to earn something and feed the poor.
    I'm not so much rich like you who don't know what is pain in life.
    My life is full of pain. But I help the poor people as much possible.
    And why are you comparing Indians with spirits.
    Don't your country have any spirits.
     
    pupul, Nov 29, 2011 IP
  13. ApocalypseXL

    ApocalypseXL Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,095
    Likes Received:
    103
    Best Answers:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #13
    I'm not rich by standards and my life has more pain then you can imagine so spare me the violins .

    Also spirits and indians meant B-2 Spirit and Tomahawks .
     
    ApocalypseXL, Nov 29, 2011 IP
  14. The Webby

    The Webby Peon

    Messages:
    1,852
    Likes Received:
    30
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    Spare me the bullshit I-wish-I-was-americanXL
     
    The Webby, Nov 29, 2011 IP
  15. boblord666

    boblord666 Member

    Messages:
    574
    Likes Received:
    9
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    33
    #15
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-...u-s-in-alarming-financial-war-game-books.html

    Quote "On a rainy Tuesday in March 2009, U.S. military and intelligence officials gathered in a war room north of Washington to watch a simulated conflict flicker across a bank of video screens.

    The struggle was pitting the U.S. against China. And China was winning hands down, writes Eric J. Weiner in “The Shadow Market,” a bleak survey of how flush authoritarian governments deploy financial means to achieve geopolitical ends.

    The weapons were dollars, stocks and bonds, not bullets and bombs. The soldiers were Wall Street bankers, hedge-fund traders and economists. For two days, they explored what would happen if the world sank into economic warfare. The outcome was alarming.

    “There was no way for America to win,” Weiner says. "

    Just a different view on what could happen.
     
    boblord666, Nov 29, 2011 IP
  16. mmerlinn

    mmerlinn Prominent Member

    Messages:
    3,197
    Likes Received:
    819
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    320
    #16
    Pakistan and China are already major partners. If China's interests in Pakistan were threatened, China would come running to aid Pakistan.

    Two of China's major interests in Pakistan are 1) the port facilities in Karachi that China is expanding and 2) the oil pipeline from Karachi to China that helps quench China's thirst for oil.

    America could not win. All China would need to do to neutralize America is quit funding America's debt. As noted above, wars cost lots of money. America has no money. One cannot reasonably expect China to fund a war by America against China.
     
    mmerlinn, Nov 29, 2011 IP
  17. ApocalypseXL

    ApocalypseXL Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,095
    Likes Received:
    103
    Best Answers:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #17
    IDK I can't spare you from yourself .
     
    ApocalypseXL, Nov 29, 2011 IP
  18. laceybeautiful

    laceybeautiful Peon

    Messages:
    1,125
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    Pakistan lost this game, it is not possible. you know that Nato alliance totally beat in Afghanistan against Mujahidin (Army). Who have no weapon, no defense, no strategy, and no air crafts.
     
    laceybeautiful, Nov 29, 2011 IP
  19. ApocalypseXL

    ApocalypseXL Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,095
    Likes Received:
    103
    Best Answers:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #19
    There is no need to humiliate yourself we all know the military capability of Pakistan .
     
    ApocalypseXL, Nov 29, 2011 IP
  20. browntwn

    browntwn Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    8,347
    Likes Received:
    848
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    435
    #20
    It is the opposite which is true. We would be better off with a trade war. We don't need cheap ass toys and tvs. We will keep our money and superior armed forces and China will fold without our commerce. Plus, as has been mentioned, we would not be likely to pay China $1 for the worthless paper debt they hold if they oppose us in a war. So they have a bunch of useless paper and rely on us for hard currency in the form of commerce. We can do without China, China cannot do without us. They buy our debt to keep us using their factories. It is a house of cards. I pray and hope we stop it soon. China backing any opponent of the US with more than mere words would be devastating... to China.
     
    browntwn, Nov 29, 2011 IP