There were a number of organizations using this building, one of them was the CIA. [video=youtube;vzPjcoZ_cPw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzPjcoZ_cPw[/video] The media doesn't talk about WTC 7 too much because it raises some serious questions.
At first glance I can see how that conclusion can be reached however I don't think it was 'orchestrated'. If, and i'm not sure it was at all, but IF wtc7 was brought down by CIA, then obviously the whole thing coulda been orchestrated too. You can see a fair bit of damage at the back and it's not that incredible to see how it could have fallen given a huge chunk of the back was missing. One might also notice it's only Alex Jones & his money-making enterprise is the only ones seriously pushing this barrow. Now the reaction by American authorities...needing to control us all and blaming that one event....that's a much bigger crime imho.
I didn't say it was the CIA, I was just answering a question. What makes you think a building will fall in such a manner because of some damage?
The two HUGE towers right beside them for one. Was that a bomb at the bottom? It was shown a piece of the plane's engine hit wtc7, as well as pieces of the other towers. Here is the real news of what went on that day - this is what went to air. http://www.archive.org/details/sept_11_tv_archive Rather than take the little bits of 'evidence' provided by Jones, spend the time to relive it, exactly as it was broadcast, not the Jones version. BTW: I am an idiot (yes I admit it). I was thinking yesterday was the anniversary because we keep hearing 9/11. In Australia it was 11/9/2001 so I keep thinking it was the 9th lol.
Why do you keep mentioning Jones, he's irrelevant. You said it's not incredible that the building fell because it had loads of damage at the back, all I'm asking you is where you got the idea that WTC 7 has to fall free-fall speed, in its own foot print .. do you have an answer to this question?
I just gave you an answer. The two HUGE towers that caved exactly the same way, from the top down. I keep mentioning Alex because he's the ONLY one continually pushing that barrow (and he keeps saying it every time I watch that movie). Conspiracy theorists (like me) rely on HIS evidence because there is NO evidence ANYWHERE else pointing to that. If you hear a bloke saying - IT WAS THE CIA - then it LIKELY is somebody perpetuating the Jones theory. There is absolutely no real evidence of what happened to the wtc7 other than what we saw. Do you think it was strange the WTC towers themselves collapsed in a similar fashion? Do you think it could be anything to do with how they built buildings back then? What motive would the CIA have for 'pulling it' as they say? My problem with perpetuating something so unbelievable is it takes our thoughts away from the real crimes, and criminals. - I don't think they are smart enough to do it. It was their stupidity that allowed it, not the other way around IMHO. And when I say their stupidity I mean the following of an imbecilic neo-con led foreign policy that asks, no, begs, for shit like this to happen.
@ApocalpseXL I am 100% arrogant,on this we agree.Honestly I do not use translators.Like you I am not a natural speaker of English as I was born and raised in France.What I know I learnt by speaking to people and by tutors.By the way allow me to congratulate you on your English,rather impressive I must say. Vorbesti vreo limba straina? I don't speak Romanian but ma qua quesi tutti parlano un po di Italiano and it is quite close to Romanian as they are all Latin.My small knowledge of Romanian was taught to me by Webmaster3,he is from Bazau. As to my education/knowledge etc.,grazie per la tua opinione.........ciao!
Any examples before 9/11 ? Usually when there's significant damage to a building it tips over. Nobody here said it was the CIA. We are calling for a new investigation instead of speculating on how the buildings came down..once we know exactly "how" we can go on to find out who it was. Once again nobody here said it was the CIA.
Two television networks made premature announcements of the collapse. The BBC announced the collapse about 23 minutes before the fact, and even featured a New York correspondent speaking of the collapse in past tense with the still-erect skyscraper standing behind her.
Yeah, we'll get right on that. Nobody gives a shit whether or not people like you believe it. Don't you get it? Terrorist supporting fools have no standing, nobody cares what you say or think, its just good for laughs.
Robbing people is not profitable for me as for killing unless you have at least a million ready to hand over you're not work killing .So you don't have to worry about robbing or killing Fixed that for you A highly educated , battle harden and well trained caveman billionaire that had a entire country at his disposal plus a terrorist network . Yep totally not a threat Mersi de complimente numai că în primul rând nu ţi-a cerut nimeni autobiografia iar în al doilea rând toată lumea ştie că omul de care vorbeşti e din Buzău . Translate that and you'll get your answer
I'd like to call for an investigation on how the Arabs came to occupy the region around Palestine. They obviously are not the original inhabitants. Once we figure out how they arrived there, we can return them to where they came from, freeing up the land for its original inhabitants. I would also like to call for a right of return for all Romans, who we know for a fact predate the modern day Arabs. dignitas, maiestas, auctoritas, libertas populi Romani They must have all been in on it! It could be a conspiracy by the network television stations, trying to prop up their ratings against those bastards at the cable news networks!
There's a great documentary made by BBC about The Truth Behind The Third Tower - Building 7. Take the time and watch it: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1555577918205271703#docid=5313004818217244745
I heard that too, but...thinking about it..that's certainly not an admission of guilt and certainly I haven't checked that against the real news. There were reporters all over the place. One could have said to the other "look at that building, it looks like it may fall" - that may have translated (in the UK) into - it fell...? FTR: I haven't rewatched all those news shows from the link I posted earlier (to confirm that it actually occured as AJ said it did) but one day I will make the time to do so, which is why I had saved the link.
@ApocalpseXL Cum te simti amice? My views about Google translator are well known.I have often posted(on General Chat) that it is useless and have explained in lavish detail as to why,so I won't use it.I basically get what you wrote.I do speak all 3 of the other Latin languages so do get Romanian to an extent.I find your keyboard interesting,you must have a very different version from what I use huh? In French we also use "accents egrave est accent acue" in our writing.Est ce que tu parle le Francais une petite peu? Anyway I apologize to the OP for getting off topic.
They would love that. Israel has all the money.. Romania has all the skimmers...yeah, might be a good match.
Wonderful! We will drive these so-called 'Palestinians" from the country they are wrongfully occupying! We should also call for an investigation into the roles their Arab neighbors like Syria and Jordan have played in the occupation by proxy. Perhaps a further investigation is needed to see what right, if any, they have to their lands. I'm pretty sure there were some original occupants that predate them as well.
Slow down a little, first we need to get the Palestinians to accept the Romanians before we can work on plan B. I think there's a good chance of that. Then, we need to work out how to get the Romanians into Israel so they can put the skimmers in place...then we move on to the withdrawal stage....then we might not need the rest of your plan.