Until you prove existence of any god and consistency of any associated gibberish ( like koran or bible), god /gods do not exist. Do you know what logic is? Google it, it'll help you
I didn't ask you anything. Your friend made the claim that God has been dis-proven "many years ago", I will wait for him to respond with the evidence.
Honestly, there is no proof that God doesn't exist. But then again there is no proof that three headed clown monster doesn't exist or Santa Clause doesn't exist or Tooth fairy doesn't exist or bigfoot doesn't exist or flying spaghetti monsters don't exist.. Existence of God is an assumption. When you make an assumption you need to search for evidence that can prove it right or wrong. Other wise it remains an assumption without any evidence to back it up. Now there are so many logical questions one can ask about God's existence, but those questions are worthless to anyone who already believes that God exists.
At least you are being honest. I observed that atheists have a hard time being honest, often making wild claims such as "God does not exist", but they don't have evidence, it's just a claim, just a wish.
Coincidentally, I happen to have exactly the same thoughts for theist too mate. Often making wild claims such as 'God is real' and 'God exists' and they do not have the evidence to back it up either, its just a claim, just an assumption..
I can ask you that if everything has to have a creator then what created deity? But I know you will come up with an answer that deity need not be created. it always existed. Then I will ask you how possibly you can even know that, then you will post something that will make no sense at all! It will go in circles.....
Of course there is no evidence it just so happens that every civilization in history no matter how remote has a concept of God . No matter if they lived they built empire or lived in trees or if they calculated that the Earth is round . But we'll ignore that and run away from religion because although we don't know jack about science or philosophy we're based on science OUR science . So we'll bang our heads , trow bones like caveman and yell every insult we can think of . That is the definitive proof that infirms the existence of God . Right ?
The Garden has always existed - The Outerworld of the Everlasting. The Persuasion of the Gardens life is the Deity and rules the universe. Life without the physiological form is possible when of the proper Persuasion is found.
Alright, part 1 of the circle completed. Now the question - How possibly can you even know that? In the contest of making hollow claims, I can make the weirdest claim.
Are you doubting the Garden exists???? At least start there and your primitive motives might move you to a Globe for Earth and from there who knows what you may learn. If you do not trust your Vision and Senses then what will you ever learn??? At any rate, chose no paths at all and simply suffocate in your physiological form and die - that is your choice.
What I meant was God has been dis-proven since people started asking questions regarding his existence. What would evidence that God does not exist look like? What about God's absence in the world? Non-believers and believers get the same set of troubles, opportunities, and so on. This God has not given us any real indicator which religion we should follow, does not speak to us(accept in occasional mindfarts, which is not convincing evidence). In a world of so much doubt don't you think God would show up on the scene and convince us that he's alive? Why would he take that chance if disbelieving in him means going to hell? You say look around at the world, it points to a creator. But there's one thing missing, the creator. I have yet to see a convincing peace of evidence, not some random fluke or fallacious statements, that God exists. What you're trying to do is make an argument from ignorance. "whatever has not been proved false must be true" So... What about the invisible china teapot revolving around the earth? What about unicorns and pixies? What about invisible, inaudible friends you can't feel? Do you have evidence that an invisible china teapot is not revolving around the earth?
The burden of showing proof that some absentee father figure up there exists is your responsibility and not to those non-believers. You claim he exists, we say prove it.
God's has been dis-proven because people started asking questions regarding his existence? It's upon you to provide the evidence that He does not exist, after all you did make the claim that he was dis-proven "many years ago" Prove that he is absent, just because you cannot see him with the naked eye does not mean he is absent. Have I ever spoken to you? If the answer is no, then does that mean I don't exist? God not speaking directly to you is not proof that He does not exist. People having doubts is not proof that God does not exist. And no , I don't think God has to make himself visible to prove to us that He exists. Not seeing God, does not mean He does not exist. I have never said anything like this, don't attribute something to me. Did I make the claim that a china pot is revolving around the earth?, If the answer is no, then there's no reason for you to ask this question. You made the claim that "God does not exist" and in addition to that you said that He has been "dis-proven many years ago", so Clinton, you made a positive claim, now you can do 2 things, you can either retract this statement, or you can provide the proof.
Reading troubles, Breeze? There is a difference between 'does' and 'always has'.. how possibly can you even know that garden always existed? God does not exist, Three Headed Clown Monster exists, he made everything in the universe out of his sperm. A pixie fairy told me so.. Prove me wrong or accept this undeniable truth.
how possibly can you even know that garden always existed? The discussion is whether life is able to exist in a state outside the physiological form initially used for its sustenance. What has never existed before is the physiological form at the inception of an individuals Creation that will perish in time. The life that guides the form will also perish if trapped by its necessity to exist dependent on the form - outside the form is the Outerworld of the Everlasting that has always been and is the source for the lifes Creation in the beginning and also available for the lifes continued existence when sustenance outside the the form is accomplished. There is a persuasion for lifes existence not related to the physiological form that is the property to be discovered to exist in the Outerworld without a Form.