Rumsfeld Caught On Video Admitting Flight 93 was shot down.

Here is just a taste of the many clues that show that the official story for 911 was a fraud. At a speech, Donald Rumsfeld is rambling off about bombings and attacks, and all of a sudden, he says " Flight 93 shot down." I want everyone to click on the link below and listen very carefully for
yourself: http://prisonplanet.com/articles/October2006/301006Rumsfeld.htm

The official story for 911 at Wikipedia states this about flight 93:

"(through testimony, tapes of passengers' phone calls, and the flight data recorders recovered from the crash) determined that crew and passengers, alerted through phone calls to loved ones, had attempted to subdue the hijackers. The Commission concluded that the hijackers crashed the plane to keep the crew and passengers from gaining control. The Commission's official report states that co-pilot LeRoy Homer, flight attendants CeeCee Lyles and Sandra Bradshaw and passengers Todd Beamer, Mark Bingham, Tom Burnett, Andrew Garcia, Jeremy Glick, and Richard Guadagno, among others, fought back against the hijackers. "

This is clear evidence that the government is lying. Donald Rumsfeld screwed up during his speech and said that Flight 93 was shot down, when the official story clearly states it was hijacked and crashed into the ground by terrorists when the passengers attempted to fight back. How could he have got that wrong?

Some of you will try to say this was a mere "mistake." Yeah right. The same mistake that Larry Silverstein, owner of the WTCs, used the term "pull it" to refer to the fall of WTC Building 7, which was not hit by airplanes. The word "pull it" means controlled demolition. He tried to say it meant the fire fighters, but they had already left the building earlier in the day.

 

Man I WISH TO GOD they would had shot down this plane.

I dont see why liberals think it would be such a grand conspiracy if by some wild chance it turned outt o be true.

What should they have done? Let is slam into the white house?

Why? So then left wing nutjobs can say it was really a missile?

 

You're missing the bigger picture. I know that it is standard procedure for Norad to shoot down planes that have been hijacked. But if the government shot down flight 93, why didn't they protect the World Trade Centers and Pentagon? And why is Rumsfeld going against the official story?

The so called "conspiracy nutjobs" have known since day one that Flight 93 was shot down, but the government has continued to follow the official story of the plane being hijacked and crashed. There were no bodies recovered as the scene, and there was a bunch of debris, but no solid pieces. This is consistent with a missile. Rumsfeld screwed up. Republican or Democrat, it doesn't matter.

 

it was obviously just a slip of the tongue, ok? just to get that out of the way.

but to adress your "other planes" thing... there simply were no SAC aircraft up anymore. Clinton killed off the Strategic Air Command in the early/mid 90's (SAC kept nuclear bombers in the air and armed fighters on standby 24/7.

now, post 9/11, in hindsight, we see his error. But pre-9/11 and post USSR.. it just didn't make sense to keep armed aircraft ready.

Remember, the left kept telling us how good Islam was and that we were safe. Only those considered to be on the "radical right" were pointing to the dangers of terrorism from the mid east on our shores.

 

If it was shot down, then it was shot down.

Citizens deserve to know the truth.

 

We do know the truth.

OK lets say it this way:

If that flight had been shot down and in this video, Rummy had said "crashed", would this thread even exist?

No. Why? CAUSE IT DOESNT MATTER. all people on that plane died at the hands of terrorists intent on destroying Me, You, America and the West as we know it.

thats all that matters. The rest is fluff and propoganda from either Bush or Osama.

I trust Bush's "theories" more than I trust Osama's.

 

Yeah, too bad he can't give citizens facts.

 

Should we believe everything the government tells us?

 

tesla, your title and point is as misleading as usual.

in context, Rumsfeld is noting attacks on our country:

What "people" are Rumsfeld referring to, that did these attacks on our country?

Where is the admission?

Why was the video clip stopped? Why does it only show a few words?

Why are you hanging out, of all places, on Prison Planet? Are you not aware that nothing honest comes from that site?

Why do the flight recordings not reflect your position?

 

LOL you just keep believing the bullshit eh mate.

 

Should we believe everything alex jones tells us?

Why is there no conspiracy on the plane crash in NY involving a baseball player? Did you believe the government that it wasn't a terrorist action?

 

well, trust what you will, I really don't care what you believe or question, so long as you promise to keep one foot firmly rooted to the ground.

Honestly, if you step back and watch from the sidelines and do your best to be impartial to this whole thing, you may find it absolutely hilarious.

follow: Known experts in fire, metalurgy, building and design and engineering all say it happens exactly like WE ALL SAW IT HAPPEN LIVE ON TV.

one nutjob with a basket weaving degree says "no, it happened when mars nuked us" or some such drivel( honesly, that is how we see the conspiracy theorists, that whacko, hence or reluctance to give them even a crumb of credibility) and everyone with an axe to grind or mental disorder jumps on the conspiracy bandwagon.

 

Why is there no plane? They could find "little" black boxes at the crash site. But there were no engines at the pa hole in the ground or the pentegon.

To many open questions on the 9/11 thing for my tastes. Especially after reading the proposed way they were going to go after Cuba in declassified documents.

You say conspiracies can't exist, secrets get out. That secret didn't. That contradicts any thing about secrets get out of the goverment.

 

See Rumsfeld being exposed for the lying bastard he is:

http://www.timetowakeup.net/video/27/Don-under-the-cosh..html

 

Hey AGS!

I found it

 

do you drool alot?

 

Do you see the contradiction here? On one hand, you ask why there is no plane when a plane dives nose first into the ground (because space aliens swooped down and picked everything up?), then note there was a black box. Are engines designed to remain in tact from a nose first crash from thousands of feet in the air?

But you don't ask, how do all the aircraft parts and remnants get there?

 

Yeah but these crankys like Mia and GTech refuse to acknowledge OPERATION NORTHWOODS even claiming that these declassified documents are fake.

We're wasting our time buddy, these people only hear what they want to hear.

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/doc1.pdf

 

Ho we shouldn't believe everything alex jones tells us, just as we shouldnt believe everything the US Government tells us. We should never just take one source as accurate.

The NY crash killed two people. I don't need the government to tell me it wasn't a terrorist attack to formulate my own ideas. Obviously it wasnt a terrorist attack.

 

Do you two work for the same proaganda agency?

All one does is post insults and the other tries to reword things till they don't make sense. But nothing either of you say has any substance.

I'm not surpised though.