for example- whats stopping anyone to copy and publish over 10 000 articles from over 5000 books on their website? what could realy go wrong? i mean as long as you remove articles that have been flagged within 24 hours? youtube has millions of copyrighted videos?
You could go to prison - and people have in extreme cases such as the one you propose. You could also be sued and be ordered to pay damages that would exceed your lifetime income. Youtube is different is that it is a service provider and they do not upload the copyright infringing material - users do. They remove the content as soon as it is reported. Even with that provider protection, they have spent over 100 million and counting in legal fees in just one copyright infringement suit with Viacom. Stupid is as stupid does.
come on mjewel- its not simple like you say - think deeper - yes - "users" upload videos to youtube - same with this x.com site - users upload articles - and somehow many many users are uploading copyrighted content! the idea here is what will realy happen? 10 000 or 100 000 unique articles from books can create huge revenue - and maybe you will only get asked to remove 1 or 2 articles per day or am i wrong?... whats stoping people from doing that? they can only ASK FOR YOU TO remove the article (by saying you " i mean the user who uploaded that article", x.com is not responsible for what users upload, just like youtube) ?????????????????????????Â
Wrong. A site can be held responsible for content in certain cases, like ones where they know, or should have known, that it was being used primarily for uploading copyrighted material. Look at Pirate Bay which didn't upload or host any content. Even if you had a legal defense, you don't have the money needed to defend yourself in such a cash. Google has the 100 million plus, you don't. It's a stupid idea, and perhaps you could try to figure out a way to make a buck without stealing from someone else - or are you not that bright?
its not an idea - its a discussion/debate - your reasonig doesnt make sense - you dont need a 100mil to defend your self at a court. - its not about making money its about knowing - what stops people from doing that
Having been involved in a couple of dozen intellectual property rights lawsuits, I can tell you the risk/reward factor is not there. Even if you don't mind stealing, copyright infringement can be a criminal charge, but the civil costs of defending yourself in a lawsuit that goes to court will easily be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars, and could go seven figures.
And What happens if I translate article from english to other language? Does this set me free from legal issue worries
Most of them do it for spinning top SEO. If we want to solve it. We may have to leave it on google. Hopefully he will be able to identify the original contents more precisely. Because, Today we will find that there's plenty of imitators on the top of search results. But what is original down to the reverse side of search results. I think this is a big problem. Because then there would be no one knows where it is really original. It may not be exactly what you asked for. But I think this is a solution that will meet the most