Here's an interesting article I ran across. Keep in mind this content is only for those who are still able to think for themselves and who also have an open mind. Also note that I did not write the article. excerpt: Get the full article here: Spooks At Google Not related to Google, below are some other perspectives you may find entertaining: * Henry Rollins on Freedom Under Attack Video Letters written and recorded ...by Henry Rollins * Dear Ann Coulter * Dear Federal Communications Commission * Dear Laura Bush .
You have to have a pretty feable and weak suggestable mind to believe this story - not an open or free-thinking one. Pete
--- and that observation is based on your: * experience * insider information * faith * wisdom * age * intellectual capacity * resistance to views outside mainstream * personal opinion * facts you're willing to share * crystal ball * knowledge of the ancients * etc., etc.?????????? .
Common sense. Anyway I believe Matt Cutts responded to the story on Threadwatch about it and debunked the source for what it was. I suppose you would think Matt was an actual CIA operative and his superiors gave him a mission to go on a little poxy blog and begin a cover-up before word gets out eh. If you like getting excited about 'conspiracy' or the possibility of Google working with the CIA though then fill your boots, just don't tell me the story is for open minded people or those who are able to think for themselves. It's for gullable and suggestable fools who can't spot B.S. when it's right in front of them. Pete
Thanks for the well thought out response -- I feel a lot safer now. If you wouldn't mind, could you post a link to the Cutts debunking article for our readers? Thanks.
Ahh, here's the story on threadbare, err, threadwatch: http://www.threadwatch.org/node/9612 Doesn't sound much like a debunking -- more like discredit, deny, distract. My money's on kidmercury and SlyOldDog
Well... do you think this is true and CIA control the world, that they even ellect the next pressident, and people all over the world are controlled by a big 34 level Massonic jerk?!
Uh, no. Where on earth did you ever get such crazy ideas? Everyone knows the real world is totally influenced and controlled by agents from Walt Disney -- "where the magic comes to you."
And your comment on my comment is based on someone else's comment that you happened to overhear, then reiterate here -- in order to accomplish what may I ask?
What's a "red rep"? -- are you implying I'm part of the communist republican party? FYI, I have no political party affiliations nor any desire to create one. On another note; why do you think everyone is so angry, defensive and on the attack? One can't even ask a question without someone going off on some wild diatribe to defend their view of the world. Yet when asked for a reason why they believe this or that, the person is unable to answer sensible. What is it that people are so afraid of that they are unwilling to discuss anything whatsoever without name calling, insults and childish behavior -- and/or quoting some governmental source? Do you think people in general are just emotionally crippled?
Well, if Matt Cuts is believed to be a governmental source, and Shakespeare/Bacon too, then the only people one can quote are the ones who speak out against the government... If I lived in the US, I sure would not vote (or have voted) for Bush, but to think google is not only working with the CIA, but also owned by them - that really defies belief.
If my memory serves me, I don't think Cutts was CIA -- I recall he had/has a top security clearance with the NSA -- the anti-constitutional agency with a history (especially of late) of compromising the citizenry's personal information. As for Bacon a.k.a. Shakespeare, unless you know something I don't, I believe that guy's dead (rip). Beyond that, if I'm allowed an opinion, it's not a difficult stretch for the thinking man to bridge an association between NSA/CIA data miners and Google. Ever hear of Operation Mockingbird?