Geez, Pieczenik and Roberts? I didn't think anyone was gullible enough to listen to those tinfoil hatters anymore. They have incredibly laughable credentials - they don't even understand the basics of high school physics. Look, I have degrees in Electrical Engineering and Engineering Science and it makes me red-faced with laughter when conspiracy clowns like Pieczenik and Roberts claim 9/11 was a fraud. I spent two semesters studying Statics and Dynamics of materials, basic load bearing for construction, etc. I'm betting neither Pieczenik nor Roberts could hammer in a nail.
Degrees are irrelevant when you have sources from as high as they do. Like I said, Dr. Pieczenik is willing to testify in front of a Grand Jury to expose the General who affirms his beliefs. You may have all the degrees under the sun, but so have Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth. Maybe Pilots for 9/11 truth think you're ignorant as you wouldn't know how to open an aircraft's door If you can be bothered, why not start a serious thread explaining how the events on 9/11 follow engineering principles or maybe a few quick points here? I'd be very interested in reading about them. There are also engineers (mechanical) in my family I should probably ask them about particulars too.
As an architect I'm appalled by the stupidity of those who ignore the the simple fact like the compressive strength of steel at 600 C . Steel becomes useless when held under fire . This is why we don't have care engines that run at more then 400 C . It's a dam simple fact yet millions of people seems to have skipped high school .
With all the "high school" banter, I'd just like to point out that these things aren't taught at school any more, if it even was when I attended. The education system here and in the US, for sure, is a joke - but that's another discussion. Apocalypse, why not start a new thread about the architecture of the towers. I for one would be very interested. I'd like to see you explain WTC7's demise, too.
Why would i start one there are literally thousands of articles about it . WTC 7 collapsed due to debris impact from the and the prolonged fire that raged throughout the building the entire afternoon . This buildings where built in the 80's with little computerized assistance even if they wanted they couldn't make them resist a fire that rages for hours and hours . Steel even if it would have been of the best quality couldn't have resisted , concrete also becomes butter at over 600 C . Building 7 could have probably been saved from collapse if the collapse of 1 & 2 wouldn't have affected the entire city network . The only piece of the puzzle that's not crystal clear is how much damage the debris did I guess this is one of the things the conspiracy theorist cling so desperately on .
Omar bin Laden, Osama's son: Omar says he always disagreed with his father about violence. He says U.S. broke international law 'IF' his father is dead!
Didn´t you mention in another thread that you wash cars for living? The economy in Romania must be really bad if their architects wash cars in Austria.
Why do you think? So I could read what YOU have to say about it, not someone else. It's not every day someone claims to be an architect. Don't be so cynical. Nice to see you still around Gworld. I haven't seen you post lately, not that I have been active for long recently.
There are some books about International Law. But I must say that no Country is following any International Law.
USA! No, certainly USA doesn't follow International Law. I don't want to say about Afganisthan and Pakistan. But I must say, about Iraq. Did US follow the International Law by attacking Iraq? USA's claim of Iraq having Bio-Chemical weapon also came false. How come you can say USA follows International Law? USA only follow its own Law?
can you sue the USA in any court of law on the planet? NO! what law? LOL...you cant sue terrorists you can only fight them