Sathya Sai Baba/ Spiritual Guru passed away - rip

They say you should not speak ill of the dead . But, when the dead is Osama bin Laden, the world's most notorious terrorist, millions of people gladly make an exception to that old rule . While the freshly banned Helvetii was doing his standard atheistic gloating I was just celebrating along with millions of people across the planet .

 

2 Days have been passed and still people haven't came through any of the visible proof that can confirm the death of that notorious terrorist. Claim Claim only Claim what we are hearing till now.. Where the fuck is "REAL" pictures or Videos depicting his death? Or you are just like another millions of gullible guys celebrating for America's fake win..

 

Breaking news : Obama has decided not to release photos or pictures of Osama bin laden. Keep celebrating morons.

 

Not so breaking news Laxative man and there is a ongoing debate :
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/05/04/bin.laden.photo.release/index.html?hpt=T2

 

Keep sleeping gypsy.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42900991/ns/world_news-death_of_bin_laden/
http://news.gkrom.com/articles/obama-wont-release-bin-laden-photos
http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_theen...lease-we-dont-trot-out-this-stuff-as-trophies

I see you are not using " Special person " phrase for me. Although laxative man is crap too but a little better then previous. Take your time and invent a better one.

 

LOL did you even took time to read the CNN article ? Or you just looked at the tile and said it's fine . You are a special person laxy , you've always been , you always manage to be 2 steps behind the majority . Most of you posts in P&R are either diluted or based on personal judgment rather then reality . You wan't me to make you rage ? LOL you're a waste of time - an amusing one i must admit - but a waste nevertheless . Oh , and one more thing your red rep just took 1 point way from me

 

Do you mean to say your posts are based on reality? We saw how you post your assumptions based on narrow-minded prejudice here

 

Where you blindly refuse to accept the laws of physics ? Yes I judge people based on reality not on blind patriotism so that makes me narrow-minded right ?

 

Haha, you're still stuck on just one point ehh? Carry on fooling around, there are lots of stupid posts of yours on that page that were rebuffed. Particularly I must point out to this post of yours (where you reason that European countries need WMDs because of the cold war), and my answer here to which you could not come up with a coherent response.

But then I must give credit to you for accepting that you hold some sort of grudge against India.

 

Are you turning into a special person or just loosing your English reading abilities ? Srsly let's look at this :

you :Why do EU countries have nuclear weapons, ICBMs, WMDs? With whom are they anticipating a war?
me :You said you where a student but you behave like you never heard of the Cold War . And unless you've been living under a rock you should have hear of START .
what you understood :that European countries need WMDs because of the cold war

LOL you might even get a insult out of me , the EU's nuclear arsenal was built during the Cold War and that the de facto superpowers are reducing their nuclear arsenal . Everything that you posted was answered and properly nuked LOL

 

Its spelt losing and not "loosing" or is that the way they teach you in 'special immigrant' schools?

Let me paste exactly what you wrote and what I replied there

My response :

So how much have the "de-facto" powers reduced their arsenal now that the cold war got over some 20 years back?

 

Any proof of that gypsy. Is it because i consider US evil who has done a mammoth damage to the world misusing its power. Even there i have pasted so many links and you never answered them . One of them was when i showed that US attacked iraq just for oil and you got a stupid image descibing the situation. Remeber that or should i give you the link.

Ok, so i posted that you gave me a red rep which you did indeed and now you divert my attention to want me argue that i gave you a red. You deserve a red but i haven't given it. If i did it will count more than 1.

BTW, stop using the cold war in your defense, its long over and makes you look stupid.

 

I don't think it's harsh to wish him good riddance. He manipulated, deceived and took advantage of people's ignorance. That is so low.

I bet he lived the high life, enjoying all the free gifts, money and praise while the peasants around him lived in squalor - but hey, they had their hope and their idol, right?

I could perform better magic tricks with my arms tied around my back:

[video=youtube;Yblhsr1O4IQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yblhsr1O4IQ&feature=related[/video]

With these blatantly lame tricks, maybe the fools around him deserved being deceived.

 

LOL you guys are getting brighter by each passing moment :

@Sar : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/START_I#Memorandum_of_Understanding_data_for_START_1

@Lax - You demonstrated the US invaded Iraq for oil ? Good one . Since you demonstrated something why didn't the CNN took your interview yet . I mean such a monumental whistle blowing would surely be breaking news . BTW since you love me so much here's a question - Who's the gypsy ?

@BRUm this post has nothing to do with you , you're just posting your opinion .

 

OK, they (Russia & US) reduced a few thousand warheads...the treaty expired in September 2009 and they still have them in the thousands. Great. And you get a tickling in your arse because India has less than 100 nuclear warheads?

BTW how much have France and UK reduced? Why do these two need nuclear weapons and ICBMs since the cold war is long over and you claimed they just got them because of the cold war?

 

Next time troll in a better way so that at least someone can understand what you are saying.

Look in the mirror.

 

OK I'm gonna give you the benefit of the doubt . No offense but how familiar are you with military strategy and politics , again no offense I'm just curious since right now it seems that we're speaking different languages .

The most important thing is that they are being reduced . Also trough the NATO pact countries can share their nuclear arsenal . France and UK have been slow to move mostly because Russia is a bigger threat to Europe then it is to North America and their arsenals are tiny compared the the US .

On the other side India is increasing it's number of nukes and it's deliverance options , for a nation that claims to want peace this is suspicious at best . Either
India plans a global hegemony or this is the most pathetic and expensive show of force in history . Both options are bad unfortunately , increasing the number of nukes will only make India a potential threat small enough to be crushed yet big enough to be put in the list of dangerous people .

@laxative : You know that i'm white and that gypsies come from India , right ?

 

Are you on the military and strategic planning division of Romanian immigrants? I doubt that's the case so you better stop patronising like you're some sort of military expert. I'm just going to prove what exactly you are in this long post.

So UK and France will not reduce/are slow in reducing warheads because Russia is a threat to Europe. I see...and when I tell you China is a threat to India, your brain refuses to acknowledge it.

While neither UK-Russia nor France-Russia have actually ever had a real confrontation on the battlefield (except during the WWs when they were with each other), China and India had a war in 1962, which you refereed to as a border skirmish..but nonetheless China captured quite a nice chunk of Indian territory and still has it. Also, China claims still more of Indian territory. While UK and France are some hundreds of miles away from Russia, India shares a huge border with China.

Harping for peace does not mean compromising on your own security. Your suspicions are prejudiced at worst, idiotic at best.

This is the most foot-in-your-mouth statement I've ever seen on DP. I'll break your statement into the two points you made above:

1. India plans a global hegemony
As far as India planning a global hegemony, let me just say that a.) India was the founder member of Non-Aligned Movement during the cold war b)Out of the three India-Pakistan wars fought in modern history, all were initiated by Pakistan. c)While loads of countries in the Asian region feel threatened by China, no country (except Pakistan) feels threatened by India.

2. this is the most pathetic and expensive show of force in history

And this is a joke? Defence expenditure rankings by country in 2010 (Source: Wikipedia)



Pathetic you say? I understand you're prejudiced of course..but most expensive? Isn't it like taking facts for a long walk?

Please don't think of Romania when you talk about India. India is the seventh largest country by geographical area, 10th largest economy and 2nd largest country by population. Most countries consider it an exciting export market for their goods rather than a military threat. You seriously need to wear spectacles and clean the earwax and of course stop the verbal diarrhea.

CONCLUSION: I think the following is something that's actually left unsaid in all of Apoc's whining:

"I ApocaplypseXL, a Romanian immigrant enjoying the comforts of life in a developed West European country (Austria), loath other countries trying to come up to the level of Europe and other established Western countries. This is the best world order and I don't want any changes to it. Third world countries should remain in their place...they better not rise or I will shit in my pants. Why do they need advanced weapons ehh? Weapons were only built for fights between Europeans & other white western countries. WWI&II and the Cold war are the only reasons that justify an increase in military spending. China? Ohh crap tech, useless bombs. India? Why does it need weapons? So what if I'm a Romanian immigrant I love my adopted home and others better not improve their own houses"

 

Lol thank you for providing me with the required info . It would seem that you're so blinded in your patriotism that you can't tell apart Russia from the UK . Once more you drift and talk about something that's hardly the subject . in case you've failed to noticed the subject was the "Nuclear Program" not India's military .

There is no way to justify the increase of the number of nuclear warheads just like there is no way to justify a human spaceflight program . India a market lol ? Maybe for other Indians and huge corporations . Right now the low income , language barrier , draconian anti-import laws and shipping distance make it impossible to see India as a potential market . Japan is still a far better place to export to then India .

 

Think you lot have gone off topic. Make a military history thread.