evisceration of the Constitution? I only eviscerate the proletariat Curious if the commie lingo was accidental or on purpose
You have not done anything but try to defend your point -- whatever that point is -- while attempting to bait me into some self-incriminating trap. You're not very good at mind games, or whatever you're trying to accomplish. You are not clear either; you only condemn me and others for speaking the truth and enlist the aid of other poor weak minded souls to follow your poisoned logic. You'd make a good Mossad prospect. Why not apply; I think there's an opening for you.
My point is that you lack integrity and apparently will make up your own facts to sell your country out over, while defending yourself for doing so. What's not clear is whether you are proud, or ashamed of doing so.
I disagree -- you are again twisting logic to suit your own purpose -- which appears to be denial that you live in absolute fear of reality. You choose to support crime by seeking some sort justification -- any justification -- in order to absolve yourself from any complicity. How can you support the murder of 650,000+ innocent lives in Iraq based on the lies of a criminal regime? A person of high moral character cannot. Is killing innocent men, women and children your idea of integrity? Is that your idea of democracy? No, I think it is you sir who should be ashamed.
note to atheists: we ask you to show some respect for religions, no matter what your views are (btw im not muslim) Thanks guys
I don't understand you. You give the credit of 650000 deaths to Bush? Don't the terrorists, the suicidal bombers, the EID's, etc.. get any credit what-so-ever? (this is besides the fact, this number has been thought to be off and it is tallied as 65,000 on a liberal site that keeps track.) So, what qualifies one to be able to kill someone and the credit goes to Bush? I may need that kind of information for the future...
BALTIMORE, Maryland (CNN) -- War has wiped out about 655,000 Iraqis or more than 500 people a day since the U.S.-led invasion, a new study reports. http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/10/11/iraq.deaths/ Iraqi Dead May Total 600,000, Study Says (NY TIMES) -- A team of American and Iraqi public health researchers has estimated that 600,000 civilians have died in violence across Iraq since the 2003 American invasion. http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FA0E16FF3B540C728DDDA90994DE404482 Study Puts War's Iraqi Death Tally at More Than 600,000 WASHINGTON (LA TIMES) -- More than 600,000 Iraqis have died violently since the U.S.-led invasion, according to a new estimate that is far higher than any other to date. http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw...oct11,1,3777236.story?coll=la-headlines-world
http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=1556534&postcount=3 http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=1557042&postcount=11 http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009108 Care to comment on any of that?
I thought perhaps ST would work to improve his credibility, but apparently in life and business, credibility is not important to him. No question about it, I would not do business with someone who intentionally and wilfully promotes bogus reports and made up facts to blame America first.
I don't think so. His home page has a PR of 4, internal pages have PR of 0, he has few quality outside links. Then again he may not be very good at SEO but he just can't do it himself.
Now that there is funny! Because he believes in those numbers. If someone says it, they're gonna believe it. Proving it? Well, that comes later if at all. But again, if someone says it's so (and they are liberal enough), other libs are gonna follow the herd. Because as you know it is all our fault. If we would just leave terrorists alone, they will leave us alone. We should stop asking them to be nice and just mind our own business. As we all know, when it comes to terrorists, deep down in side, thems good people. Consider the sources