You were so upset with him that you even created a thread about this in SnF. ROFL http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=2130603
Just for the record sammy's ethics are quite vaporous . He did got banned before so don't expect him do post something well thought or to show a shred of modesty .
i corrected it for you. Oh i got death threats before on here sure. but i was banned for calling some of the staff here corrupt. not banned for calling homophobes dumbasses and i hate all religion and hold all religious people in contempt. I don't discriminate, i hate them all equally.
Well... In light of that refreshing sentiment, here's a reminder... You sorta give the impression your life sucks and you wanna share the misery, so you're gonna see how many people you can insult before you get banned. Lighten up, act a little less like a brat. Nobody's impressed and you're just gonna give yourself a heart attack.
If it is, then so is heterosexuality. That's to say, if it's a "condition affecting an organism". Homosexuality occurs in practically all species. Some species, like the bonobo (out closest relative), are almost exclusively bisexual.
I think you understand the definition as I've spelled it out. No need to provide your own to make an argument. Except.... the topic is homosexuality not bisexuality. Any species that was "exclusively" homosexual would very quickly become extinct, wouldn't you agree?
I find homophobic statements and comments posted on here insulting, so i have every right to to insult the very people that post that crap. although i own a lesbian chat site, i am not lesbian. but i still find homophobic statements and comments insulting. the very fabric of these homophobic posts stem from religions preaching hate and not peace, although the hypocrites do proclaim they are peaceful. they turn my stomach. pro life Christians, blowing up pregnant women at abortion clinics claiming they kill people and babies to fight for the babies rights. ffs have you ever heard such perverted ways of thinking? and the religion that is the very fabric of this threads main post, more insulting crap from the religion of peace. do i care if i get banned for life? i thought i was, so no i don't care one bit. i already had 9 heart attacks, if you want to see the proof i can show you it.
A pathology is a disease, or more precisely the study of disease, and a disease is defined as a condition affecting an organism. Why what definition were you using? Well no i wouldn't agree. It depends entirely on the means of reproduction, and even in species where a male and female is required for reproduction there is nothing to stop them reproducing still using a male and female. Homosexuality denotes only a sexual and/or romantic preference, it doesn't exclude the ability to still reproduce. Homosexuals don't become sterile, they just have a predominant sexual attraction to the same gender. It's quite common now for gay people to have children. So if homosexuals can, and do, reproduce i don't see how that could inevitably lead to extinction.
oh dear, you are not aware that female only species live and have no male to copulate with so 2 female go though the motions, and this ensure they reproduce? Sir i would really really advise you to look up a subject before you post crap you know nothing about and end up making yourself look a fool. are you also not aware that 100's of other species are hermaphrodites and can choose to be either sex to have offspring? here i posted a link to one just so you can see how your uneducated brain has no idea what it is talking about, and you are as dumb as you look. homosexuals have sex with women lmao what a fucked up education that book has given you. http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2010-02/23/why-ladies-only-species-dont-need-men
You love to argue, don't you. I suppose you are a lot like me, minus the facts, logic, and reason. I'd love to entertain you but I have a more important engagement removing the lint from my navel. Should you take the time to re-read the thread, you'll find your comments have already been addressed.
i have already proven you have not the capacity to claim you know the facts,, your brain is also illogical and you have no reason.
Don't run away just yet, i haven't finished playing with you. Do you agree that being homosexual doesn't mean the individual can not reproduce? And do you agree that homosexuals do, quite regularly, reproduce?
I was always under the impression that reproduction required a representative of each gender. If you are talking about surrogate mothers, sperm donors, egg donors, adoption, and other types of things that a sterile person might use to reproduce, then yes, I 100% agree that homosexuals do reproduce though I'm not sure we could call it "regularly". As I mentioned in my previous post, this has been addressed earlier in this thread.
It does, at the moment, or at least material from each gender. But it doesn't require them to either have sex or be sexually attracted to each other. So if they can, and do, reproduce what would lead to their extinction? Your confusion seemed to be based on the misapprehension that being homosexual prohibits an individual from reproducing, something which you now admit is not the case.
There are no males of this species A species that reproduces with 2 females. http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2010-02/23/why-ladies-only-species-dont-need-men