Quality back links are those links which come from high PR sites,trusted sites and authorized sites...............
You are making a fundamental mistake by linking PR and serp's. The one does not depend on the other. To position yourself in the search results you build one way targeted back links and here a quality link is nothing more complicated than a link which lasts, matures and grows. In addition to this, to glue it all together you network and build an internet presence on sites that are relevant to the niche market you are servicing. This primarily to draw traffic to your site but you also want to exploit opportunities to gain both unsolicited as well as actively solicited links from third party sites. These may or may not come with the anchor text which is so critical when link building. And here a quality link is a link from a high profile, high traffic site that is relevant to the business you run. PR shouldn't ever be a consideration. It is something you earn if you stick at it and build a useful site. However it is a metric which is open to manipulation and abuse and as such is meaningless except to those who hope to gain from your naivety.
Some people says that links are just a links... So if i'm the owner new web directory and i have link from other new directory is same as link from dmoz? hahaha Don't make me lought because i can't...
Have you tried getting a link from Dmoz? Reality is that in most cases you don't get links from so called authority sites. So yes, links are just links, if you take the statement in terms of the context of the link pool you have to draw from. But have you measured this boost you are supposed to get from authority sites? Who says a link from Dmoz is any better? And if it is why is it any better? Have you stopped to think how Google will measure a quality link? Surely not pr...rorf, rorf What's the next line?
Your backlinks on a same themed website having good PR and maximum 50 outbound link on the page, is a quality link.
No one said that is easy to get links from authority sites...that is why those links are so powerful. So please keep that stupid comments based on experience with your quality directory. Who said that Dmoz is better that, for example your directory? I said that...why? I explain that for you in very simple way , like for little kid... What Dmoz offer - age of domain and traffic ,and popularity etc. What linkaidafrica.com/directory/ offer- few minutes of good lought. Do you know now why links from high authority websites are more powerful?
I just had another look on your quality website which is linkaidafrica.com/ Tell me have u ever seen another webite where title is longer then description? and website where is 10s of keywords in title? and keywords space filled with same content as title? hahaaha and you giving me ideas of good seo practice... I tell you what you should do now....delete your profile because you got no clue what you are talking about. But thanks for good lought and think about change of profession for comedian. Whoever read this please check out that webiste....please
Age of domain - maybe. But traffic, I don't think so. And popularity, how does that affect ones serp's? Google recognises Dmoz as a credible directory because it was a trail blazer in its day. Something you could not be expected to understand. Dmoz stood for a principal which is again something that is in short supply. So just run that past me again if you would. How much do you really know about Dmoz? Did you ever volunteer your time and effort as an editor? We almost agree on this. But the way I would put it is that authority sites are authority sites because the rats and mice don't get links for the asking. That much we agree on. But the jury still needs to determine whether or not you really get a super charged boost and if you do whether it is worth it. And do me a favour, please try to understand that I have a right to disagree with you. I think the point you are missing is that Link Aid Africa is indexed, is manually updated and edited and it will be around for a lot longer than you. I just dangle it out there hoping some clown will take the bait and make nasty comments about it. So thx!
The biggest clown here is you i'm afraid ... You got the right to disagree ,everybody does ... I'm not gonna loose more time for people like you because i don't see any sense .. I just hope that never ever anybody will be thinking to use your ideas and skills .
Please don't even try defend your website ...i seen enough. Lets go back to the niche of this thread .. Tell me guru, which option give me better rankings on G?: 100 links from high authority websites with tons of traffic ,and lets say from Pr6 to Pr9 or 1000 links from pr0 Both exaples are related to your niche.
Quality links are links that are coming from the outside sites with PR going to your site which they called the inbound links. The best quality links are the natural links meaning no intervention by you and are just link by people that visits your site and loves your site that's the best quality link.
I don't mean to point anything. But you got to search it for yourself if you want it. Its just some other people don't give it for free. Mr. G is your bestfriend.
High authority web sites don't give links away for the asking but assuming they do High authority sites don't usually give anchor text So why would one choose this option? Neither traffic nor PR have any affect on serps so scrub them as part of the discussion and what does that leave us with, other than 1000 one way back links with targeted anchor text, yes? With deep links, yes? Me I go with PR0 every time. The only question I ask is whether the link I secure will last and last and last. Quality links are links that grow and which are allowed to mature