Is the google adsence consider the website's ranking or popularity to serving ads???

Discussion in 'Guidelines / Compliance' started by ramy7, Feb 15, 2011.

  1. #1
    Hello,
    i just want to know is the absence team consider's website's ranking like PR or Alexa to serving the ads. one of my friend told me that the site's have good ranking or PR have more ad value of the ad in terms of money. it's quite logical that the advertiser pay more to be on good Website... Any suggestion??
     
    ramy7, Feb 15, 2011 IP
  2. psharma

    psharma Prominent Member

    Messages:
    1,955
    Likes Received:
    85
    Best Answers:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    345
    #2
    I think yes, they emphasize on quality of the website when displaying expensive ads on it.
     
    psharma, Feb 17, 2011 IP
  3. ramy7

    ramy7 Peon

    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    Tht means.. the higher page ranked websites got expensive ad unit ?? In terms of CPC???
     
    ramy7, Feb 17, 2011 IP
  4. psharma

    psharma Prominent Member

    Messages:
    1,955
    Likes Received:
    85
    Best Answers:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    345
    #4
    Not according to the pagerank exactly. But yes, a real credit card tips website gets better ads than a content farm showing random articles on credit card tips. and thus earn a real CPC of $5 while junk websites never go beyond $0.20
     
    psharma, Feb 17, 2011 IP
  5. RumpledElf

    RumpledElf Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,054
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    100
    #5
    I've had my main site for quite a few years and every time it goes up in PR, the ads pay better.
     
    RumpledElf, Feb 19, 2011 IP
  6. nitchiworld

    nitchiworld Peon

    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    it depends upon you website or blog content quality and visitors country and niche of your blog.
     
    nitchiworld, Feb 21, 2011 IP