I have a theory that I'm trying to prove. Please help me by answering the following: 1. Is it ever acceptable to go to war? 2. If yes, under what circumstance(s)? 3. Is it ever acceptable to use a weapon of mass destruction? 4. If yes, under what circumstance(s)? 5. Please list your gender/country/political bias (conservative, liberal, etc.) Thanks!
1. Yes. 2. If there is an actual threat from an actual enemy, not "blanket threats and enemies" 3. No. Indiscriminate killing is always wrong. 4. - 5. Registered republican, anti-iraqi war, pro-tolerance and peace
1. Is it ever acceptable to go to war? Yes. 2. If yes, under what circumstance(s)? If your actions will, in the long term, cause more good than harm. 3. Is it ever acceptable to use a weapon of mass destruction? Yes. 4. If yes, under what circumstance(s)? If it will, in the long term, cause more good than harm. 5. Please list your gender/country/political bias (conservative, liberal, etc.) Male / USA / Libertarian (but to these questions, Utilitarian)
1. Yes 2. only when you have been attacked and know who has done it 3. never 4. - 5. Female, Ireland, Republican
Absolutely. When there is an imminent threat or where hostile action has already been taken by the enemy. Basically wherever the lives of others can be saved by taking the lives of the enemy. Not anymore. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were one thing, but in the age of MAD the use of a single WMD could escalate to full-scale thermonuclear war. N/A Male, US, moderate conservative (conservative moderate?) No problem.
Of course. Wake up on the wrong side of the bed. Fight with the wife. Need to rig an election. Pretty much any reason. Yes. When you are too lazy to duke it out for more than, say, a week? Need to get that victory parade in before the election!
1. Is it ever acceptable to go to war? Yes 2. If yes, under what circumstance(s)? To save lives from mad men like sadam H or when attacked. 3. Is it ever acceptable to use a weapon of mass destruction? Yes 4. If yes, under what circumstance(s)? Only when used against you first 5. Please list your gender/country/political bias (conservative, liberal, etc.) Female, Swedish/english. UK Wouldn't vote for anyone, they all lie and are corrupt. Neutral
Samantha, since your PMS is up for debate in that other thread; you should really use it as an excuse, if not for WMD use, than for war.
1. YES. 2. If something happens that effects our jurisdiction of control/power/government, or something threatens us directly. 3. Yes. 4. If we warn the offending country or organization before time, and they fail to adhere to warnings, and/or if we are bombed with a WMD or more than one. 5. Conservative/Male/United States - and PROUD OF IT!
PMS, just hit the button, and wipe mankind off the face of the plannet, then i have no-one to bitch at
it's lame. thats the nature of the mankind, there wil always be wars and weapons and conflicts. One of the main reasons is lots of countries produce weapons and they need to sell them to someone..
yea nor do men and women guys always wanna put us down, or lift our skirts. they just have poor judgement on doing either most of the time
as a sexual health advisor, i'll give you one tip, sexual headaches are something that effect 4 times more men than women, guys just think we have a headache all the time when it comes to sex, but sexual headaches are what kill more men on the job, than heart attacks do. a sexual headache is what guys get just as they reach orgasm, and can cause a stroke. we just say we have a headache because sex is boring most of the time like politics and religion.