You are pathetically crude, there's no need for it. You grasp of the English language seems good enough that you could use the term 'procreate' without great mental exertion. If you took the time to investigate, rather than draw simple conclusions based on lack of knowledge, your argument would be one of value. As it stands now, it is simply your biased opinion. If you wish to know how it is scientifically sound that we could come from two single parents, then please ask. Do not simply claim that it's wrong.
Oopz, too much anti comments, Sorry if i have hurt you guyz feelings ., I will edit my post . I just posted it thinking it to be funny
"A person who hears the truth, and listens, is wise. A person who hears the truth, and ignores it, is the manifestation of stupidity." - Me.
Amen. I, too, am a Chrisitian and I believe Christianity is the one and only right religion. I agree with what you say. Now, this is not to say that I don't appreciate other religions, I do. However, I don't feel the same way about them as I do with Christianity.
Can you tell me some historical accuracies, that christianity has given., Every religion has someone say that there is proof., Even in india, you can find instances of Lord krishna's exisitence, Also in india, you can see Lord buddha's place where he got enlightenment., Hinduism denots god as "BRahman" and as per Brahma Sutra The word 'Brahman' denotes the hightest Person (purushottama), who is essentially free from all imperfections and possesses numberless classes of auspicious qualities of unsurpassable excellence. The term 'Brahman' is applied to any things which possess the quality of greatness (brihattva, from the root 'brih'); but primarily denotes that which possesses greatness, of essential nature as well as of qualities, in unlimited fulness; and such is only the Lord of all. Hence the word 'Brahman' primarily denotes him alone, and in a secondary derivative sense only those things which possess some small part of the Lord's qualities; for it would be improper to assume several meanings for the word (so that it would denote primarily or directly more than one thing). The case is analogous to that of the term 'bhagavat [FOOTNOTE 4:1].' The Lord only is enquired into, for the sake of immortality, by all those who are afflicted with the triad of pain. Hence the Lord of all is that Brahman which, according to the Sûtra, constitutes the object of enquiry. The word 'jijñâsâ' is a desiderative formation meaning 'desire to know.' And as in the case of any desire the desired object is the chief thing, the Sûtra means to enjoin knowledge--which is the object of the desire of knowledge. The purport of the entire Sûtra then is as follows: 'Since the fruit of works known through the earlier part of the Mîmâmsâ is limited and non-permanent, and since the fruit of the knowledge of Brahman--which knowledge is to be reached through the latter part of the Mîmâmsâ--is unlimited and permanent; for this reason Brahman is to be known, after the knowledge of works has previously taken place.'--The same meaning is expressed by the Vrittikâra when saying 'after the comprehension of works has taken place there follows the enquiry into Brahman.' And that the enquiry into works and that into Brahman constitute one body of doctrine, he (the Vrittikâra) will declare later on 'this Sârîraka-doctrine is connected with Jaimini's doctrine as contained in sixteen adhyâyas; this proves the two to constitute one body of doctrine.' Hence the earlier and the later Mîmâmsâ are separate only in so far as there is a difference of matter to be taught by each; in the same way as the two halves of the Pûrva Mîmâmsâ-sûtras, consisting of six adhyâyas each, are separate [FOOTNOTE 5:1]; and as each adhyâya is separate. The entire Mîmâmsâ-sâtra--which begins with the Sûtra 'Now therefore the enquiry into religious duty' and concludes with the Sûtra '(From there is) no return on account of scriptural statement'-- has, owing to the special character of the contents, a definite order of internal succession. This is as follows. At first the precept 'one is to learn one's own text (svâdhyâya)' enjoins the apprehension of that aggregate of syllables which is called 'Veda,' and is here referred to as 'svâdhyâya.' Next there arises the desire to know of what nature the 'Learning' enjoined is to be, and how it is to be done. Here there come in certain injunctions such as 'Let a Brahnmana be initiated in his eighth year' and 'The teacher is to make him recite the Veda'; and certain rules about special observances and restrictions--such as 'having performed the upâkarman on the full moon of Sravana or Praushthapada according to prescription, he is to study the sacred verses for four months and a half--which enjoin all the required details. What does christianity say about god?. I heard that there are 3 branches of god., How can god be 3?
All religion have truth in them, An ignorant and arrogant person would say only his religion and scripture is right and discredit any other religions and scriptures. Sometimes, its funny too see how people argue whose religion is better when they all believe there is only 1 god. I personally think most people are giving out their valuable time fighting for religion than serving god itself. The reason why we have "crusade" and now terrorism. as what Cheap SEO Services said, they put the verses out of context and follow it literally, but worse, some don't even follow it literally, they follow it blindly, they follow it without even read the scripture and understand the scipture. If only people serve their god and do what they were told to do instead of fighting about whose religion is the best, this world will be in "peace".
Those who discuss about "which religion is the best" Are the best fools in the world., Dont discuss religion, Follow the truth (GOD) - Lord krishna.,
I just read that they found the missing opening page to the bible. It reads: "To my darling Candy, all characters portrayed in this book are fictitious and any resemblance to persons living or dead is purely coincidental."
There is no "right" and "wrong" religion... nor is there a way to prove it. Religion should be based on faith. Thanks for making us christians look like jackasses. Maybe try reading the new testament's passages about tolerance and peace. Good luck.