Terrorists are still alive & kicking

If not for the current drama this forum has, many would bash you with what you have posted. Be extra careful what you post here.

 

What hard questions are you talking about ? Your biased video is hardly a questioned , so are the personal attacks . The DP public will think that your either trolling or engaging in a smear campaign .

We didn't defined him . He was a muslim , by his own choice . His actions where motivated by Islam .

 

For starters, 1) Proving where anyone supported communism 2) Providing proof that Assange is charged/accused of/ committed rape 3) Providing names of anyone who has been harmed directly as a result of Wikileaks activities.

BTW someone complained to Shawn about you: http://twitter.com/GeekHang/status/16059799913369600

 

Well communism is not any of my business . Personally I know that Europe would ever want that monstrosity back so I am not worried about that .

The rape allegations will be confirmed or infirmed by a Swedish court .The fact is that he is charged whit sex crime . Not whit having sex without a condom , but with transforming consensual sex into non-consesual sex a.k.a. rape .

You want names of people that died due to Take-a-Leak ? Here have a look at some of them : http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/afghanistan/page1/ . Now come and tell me that this isn't stone proof and that they would have died even if the 2000+ infiltrators would have done their job . This is pure harm .

If we include the strategical , economical , political & psychological harm you need to include the entire US diplomatic apparatus which is on red alert doing damage control thanks to Wikileaks . There are good reasons why diplomats have special passports and their bags go unscanned . Diplomacy is not done whit brute truth . But who needs treaties ? Right ?

As for GeekHang he can call me a racists all day long . I'm not gonna auto-flagellate for something I haven't done . It's nice to see how much of storm can a simple cartoon generate . You're always talking about hypocrisy Hevetii . Well this is an example , when it comes to freedom his a defender but he would haply take away the freedom of speech from someone he doesn't agree whit .

EDIT : Shawn's reply :

 

Seems like everyone has abandoned Spencer over that comment and he has abandoned this place. This is the 4th time he left because he was so pathetically humiliated and exposed that he won't bother to show his face for 2 weeks now. Fourth time this is happening, 2 times thanks to gworld and 2 to me

Stop believing everything peopleSEO tells you. If I prove this wrong one last time will you jump the fence and stop this rhetoric? First of all he is not charged with rape or anything for that matter. No official charges were ever brought, he's only wanted for questioning on "allegations" which according to police reports - the most credible evidence so far are:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/17/julian-assange-sweden

So where is the rape or the withdrawal of consent? Now don't act all hysterical or thick. Accept that you were wrongly informed/unaware OR the fact or like peopleSEO and Onation knew everything but it didn't suit your propaganda so yo lied and ignored it.

I think you misunderstood my question, here its again: Provide names of anyone who has been harmed directly as a result of Wikileaks activities.

What you posted doesn't sound like direct at all, hell it doesn't even look like indirect fault of wikileaks. Show me where someone whose identity was revealed by wikileaks was harmed as a result of the info leaked by them. Try again.

A good way to avoid embarrassment would be to avoid doing something embarrassing to begin with. There has to be a price for all the good that came out of wikileaks cablegate, there's no way they could have screened 250,000 documents before releasing. The question is why did they need to release it? Because excessive government secrecy and corruption is pissing people off and they want to know the truth. Wikileaks is only filling a vacuum created by the government. The documents wouldn't have reached them if people were happy with the government. The leakers wanted to be anonymous and were not after 15 minutes of fame, the only reason they leaked things was because they detested those practices. The only reason wikileaks is live is because of donations and widespread support of the majority of people.

*cough*

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...plomat-lodges-protest/articleshow/7084319.cms

http://news.oneindia.in/2010/12/13/indian-un-envoy-pat-down-search-us-airport.html


Well lastly its futile wasting my time typing all this if you are not willing to read with an open mind. You don't have to always argue back, even when you know you are wrong. Let me know if you are willing to change your position or else I can go back to lulz bashing Onation and spencer and that peoplesseo guy.

 

I'll reply to your posts in the next days (or maybe sooner) right now I got to hit the road . In the mean time find some other sources for the violation of the diplomat status . Times of India , if I remember correctly published that stupid stuff about 1 in scientist is indian half of NASA is indian and so on . I just don' trust Indian newspaper to be unbiased . CNN , BBC or Euronews will do .

 

AFP credible enough for you? LOL, amazing that you think a news item of this magnitude would be faked by a national daily.

 

This just reminds me of the whole worldcup thing

 

Aah, the irony of a bloke that obviously listens to biased news all day arguing ANY paper is biased.

http://www.americandailyherald.com/politics/tsa-pat-down-angers-diplomat

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/ind...for-refusing-to-allow-pat-down-of-his-turban/

http://news.yahoo.com/s/time_rss/20...andiplomatpeevedaboutpatdownxidrssnationyahoo

http://www.smartertravel.com/blogs/...over-tsa-pat-down-of-diplomat.html?id=6417221

http://www.prisonplanet.com/clinton...-humiliating-pat-down-of-indian-diplomat.html

http://travel.usatoday.com/flights/...-airport-/134197/5?csp=outbrain&csp=obnetwork

Any more proof required?

 

From 1 side you are true now its time to have guns just like mobile phones but ordinary public don't have time to kill others like terrorist general public want to live peacefully with all religion people... If we will also act same than what's difference between them & we people........

 

The difference between those who are armed and those who are unarmed is that the latter will be shot.

Still to come a reply to Helvetti . (sorry been in places so wild that even mobile Internet signal is to weak to post on DP)

 

This will end only if All Muslims or All Non Muslims are not killed what do you say....

 

You really should read the Quran before posting such silliness.

Child, I have been busy with a major site migration. Neither you nor your gay lover gworld are important enough to notice. I have stepped on cockroaches whose existence meant more to the world than yours.

I think it's funny that you're stalking me. Have you create a fan site yet? Are you collecting my smelly underwear?

 

Firstly, don't call me child....grandson would be more apt. Secondly what kind of a site is that? How to screw an arab wife while hating arabs at the same time in 101 ways? Or how to pretend to be a univ student while working as a janitor?

 

That won't do. Referring to you in the masculine goes against the clear femininity of your photo. Also, child and grandson both overstate your mental age. I thought child was much better than him creating some new name that means, "cross dressing mental midget".

 

I actually feel sorry for your 5 year old "child" who the police attempted to put in foster care citing your poor mental health when you showed up at a Obama rally armed with automatic rifles and pistols, I guess its only because of your much smarter wife who mocks you on a daily basis as admitted by you that your "child" it still with you. But then she still has to live with a drunk unemployed republican listening to fox news going on and on about Obama being some undercover Muslims agent

 

Hellvetti has gone off the deep end and is now sharing with us the bizarre contents of his fantasy life.

 

He should have listened to Nancy Reagan. Just say NO Mr. Srivastava. Just say NO. Taking off the skirt would be a good first step.

 

@Helvetti

Julian Assange is wanted to be questioned in two rape investigations . I know it's hard for you to swallow and that you can't see your hero as a rapist but for a woman what he did is rape . He wanted for questioning because an arrest warrant can't be issued while the prosecution doesn't interview him .

While The Guardian is a respected paper i do believe they are slightly biased since they've been making quite the buck by being Wikileaks special friends . Again this will be settled in a court of law . Until then all this is small talk .

Wikileaks actions forced the removal of 2000 CIA operatives . This is quite possibly the largest withdrawal of agents in history . In a war where the enemy wears civilian clothes information is more valuable then a F-22 . From a military point of view that's worst then loosing air power . To say that that didn't hurt anyone is like saying that calling someone a Jew didn't hurt him during the holocaust .

I did some research into diplomatic status and it appears that while it guarantees the recognition of the diplomatic status it does not guarantee any rights . Something like I know you're a friend but that doesn't mean you have the right to crash at my place .

I'll add a post on the diplomatic damage latter .

 

What is missing here is why the CIA is removing agents - not because a Private in the military, Manning exposed information publicly but as a result of gross incompetence on the CIA's behalf for the breach to have occurred when theoretically Manning could have sold the same information to a foreign gov't in secrecy for a lavish lifestyle having the same 2000 agents selectively killed or compromised without anyones knowledge.

Manning and Wikileaks are not the culprits but the scapegoats to yet another example of the gov'ts military / security complex castigating open government as the result of their own incompetence and denial of responsibility.

Has anyone in the CIA, Pentagon, NSA etc. been even demoted much less removed?