OBAMA Visit to INDIA.....What do you think?

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by cyber-world, Nov 6, 2010.

  1. #1
    Every Americans, Indians and many other knows is it well, that barack Obama is on visit To India..

    Any kind of deal?

    he want to help India?

    He want to help America?

    He wanted to visit Worlds largest democratic country??

    or anything else??

    what do you think about it ?
     
    Last edited: Nov 6, 2010
    cyber-world, Nov 6, 2010 IP
  2. ApocalypseXL

    ApocalypseXL Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,095
    Likes Received:
    103
    Best Answers:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #2
    I think that posting in CAPS sucks .
     
    ApocalypseXL, Nov 6, 2010 IP
  3. Will.Spencer

    Will.Spencer NetBuilder

    Messages:
    14,789
    Likes Received:
    1,040
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    375
    #3
    I think he wants to see the world on the taxpayer's dime before he gets booted out of office.
     
    Will.Spencer, Nov 7, 2010 IP
  4. cyber-world

    cyber-world Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    437
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    138
    #4
    haha..thats pretty good response...

    As per the source: He has become salesman
     
    cyber-world, Nov 7, 2010 IP
  5. khokon

    khokon Peon

    Messages:
    399
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    I think... India pakistan war not so far...
     
    khokon, Nov 7, 2010 IP
  6. Will.Spencer

    Will.Spencer NetBuilder

    Messages:
    14,789
    Likes Received:
    1,040
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    375
    #6
    I do not agree. The Paki's are pretty crazy, but I don't think they are crazy enough to attack India. Doing so would push them over the edge from "pretend allies" to "real enemies" of the United States.
     
    Will.Spencer, Nov 7, 2010 IP
  7. Valdor

    Valdor Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    450
    Likes Received:
    23
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    185
    #7
    Be careful, the PM of the UK David Cameron just struck up a deal in India to allow unregulated intercompany transfers of Indian workers into the UK and also the EU has given India 20,000 work visas a year for Indian I.T. workers for the UK.
     
    Valdor, Nov 8, 2010 IP
  8. Obamanation

    Obamanation Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    8,016
    Likes Received:
    237
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #8
    We sell that in the US as giving away "Jobs Americans dont Want". The other sell on that one is, "Jobs Americans are not trained to do". Apparently selling it as, "Jobs a poorly trained foreigner with bad english skills is willing to do for much less, provided we can get them into the country" doesn't work to well with the voting public. Don't sweat it though. I'm sure unemployment in the UK is non-existent, so importing labor for those jobs is the charitable thing to do, and doesn't cost you a thing.
     
    Obamanation, Nov 8, 2010 IP
  9. Helvetii

    Helvetii Notable Member

    Messages:
    4,412
    Likes Received:
    90
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    205
    #9
    Its very hypocritical to expect other countries to open up their economies for you while you adopt protectionist policies. I'm glad your leadership doesn't share this attitude, what you guys think isn't worth a continental.
     
    Helvetii, Nov 8, 2010 IP
  10. masterrio

    masterrio Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    938
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    145
    #10
    over protectionism will be some thing to watch out for, don't sweat it over then :p
     
    masterrio, Nov 8, 2010 IP
  11. ApocalypseXL

    ApocalypseXL Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,095
    Likes Received:
    103
    Best Answers:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #11
    Ever heard of trade deficit Helvetti ? The solution for global prosperity is not for one nation to get rich by sucking from another one's wealth . The economic crisis was largely triggered by the fact that the Western nations imported from China like mad . I know you're trying to protect your revenues but the key to a nation's prosperity is internal growth .

    Thanks to extremely weak policies in the last 2 years the prime dictator of China is now the world's most powerful man . Long live oppression and brutal exploitation , yay .
     
    ApocalypseXL, Nov 8, 2010 IP
  12. Helvetii

    Helvetii Notable Member

    Messages:
    4,412
    Likes Received:
    90
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    205
    #12
    China is a different case, they artificially undervalue their currency which is not in the spirit of free market globalization.
     
    Helvetii, Nov 8, 2010 IP
  13. ApocalypseXL

    ApocalypseXL Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,095
    Likes Received:
    103
    Best Answers:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #13
    Whit the existence of a ruthless monopoly on energy and rare earths I don't think we can talk about a free market glottalization . It's more of a polished myth that some people throw around .
     
    ApocalypseXL, Nov 8, 2010 IP
  14. love**

    love** Peon

    Messages:
    583
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    I am Indian and its very
    honorable to us that Mr.Barack
    Obama visit India and enjoying each
    and every moment.Definitely this
    trip of President strong the relation
    between both countries.
     
    love**, Nov 8, 2010 IP
  15. Obamanation

    Obamanation Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    8,016
    Likes Received:
    237
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #15
    Countries need to do what is in their own interest. Expansion of the global economy and free trade is good for everyone, but I am most definitely not a fan of any country importing foreign workers to drive down the labor cost within their own market. I'm am also not at all a fan of one world government. When all countries have some sort of economic parity, perhaps then we can consider open borders. Until then, its just a stupid anti-nationalist wealth re-distribution program.
     
    Obamanation, Nov 8, 2010 IP
  16. ApocalypseXL

    ApocalypseXL Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,095
    Likes Received:
    103
    Best Answers:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #16
    It will be another couple of hundred years or more before the worlds powers will implement open borders and even then regulations will be in place .
     
    ApocalypseXL, Nov 8, 2010 IP
  17. sar420

    sar420 Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,147
    Likes Received:
    212
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #17
    Wrong. Ever heard of the sub prime crisis? The simple explanation: people borrowed and borrowed money from the banks, who gave easy credit without checking whether those people will be able to repay their loans or not. In the end, most loans were defaulted. Lehman bros became bankrupt and a few banks had to be bailed out. Lack of proper financial regulation in the US and some other western countries was the reason for the crisis.
     
    sar420, Nov 8, 2010 IP
  18. ApocalypseXL

    ApocalypseXL Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,095
    Likes Received:
    103
    Best Answers:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #18
    Actually that's just a small part of the problem. The financial sector crisis was just the boil that ruptured and hurt like hell . Where do you think the Chinese got enough money to start pushing their e-peen around ? Whit what finances was Burj Dubai built ?

    The West's highly advanced economies managed to sustain the huge oil imports but when we started loosing the industrial edge and added immigration pressure the money started to run out . We always borrowed like mad simply because we love to build , invest and create something closer to perfection but when the base mechanism failed the shock wave traveled from the industries to the loaners and to the banks . And the the banks exploded triggering a chain reaction . The thing whit economy is that the most complicated thing is extremely simple and the simplest thing is enormously complicated .

    Anyway more on that in the next few days .
     
    ApocalypseXL, Nov 8, 2010 IP
  19. Helvetii

    Helvetii Notable Member

    Messages:
    4,412
    Likes Received:
    90
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    205
    #19
    No dude, you have got it all wrong.

    1) Banks lent money to people who couldn't pay it back
    2) Credit creation cycle was disrupted and money supply shrunk
    3) Houses were foreclosed in large numbers and went on sale suddenly creating a glut in the market
    4) Property prices reduced and that made people intentionally default on more loans
    5) Ultimately banks racked up huge bad debts
    6) There was no credit creation
    7) Little available credit became expensive and businesses didn't have access to cheap credit
    8) Expansions were not possible and businesses depending on credit had to cut down production.
    9) This lead to shrinking of the economy and unemployment.

    Most complicated thing is extremely simple and the simplest thing is made to be enormously complicated.
     
    Helvetii, Nov 8, 2010 IP
  20. sar420

    sar420 Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,147
    Likes Received:
    212
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #20
    I'm afraid Helvetii's got it all right here
     
    sar420, Nov 8, 2010 IP