Is this in violation?

Discussion in 'Guidelines / Compliance' started by MrX, Oct 5, 2006.

0
  1. #1
    MrX, Oct 5, 2006 IP
  2. phillip

    phillip Active Member

    Messages:
    727
    Likes Received:
    14
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #2
    yea, you can only have 3 ad links

    also, where in so cal are you from? im from the OC
     
    phillip, Oct 5, 2006 IP
  3. Cristian Mezei

    Cristian Mezei Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,332
    Likes Received:
    355
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    213
    #3
    He's breaking both Yahoo's and Google's TOS.

    You can't have YPN and Adsense on the same page.
     
    Cristian Mezei, Oct 5, 2006 IP
  4. phillip

    phillip Active Member

    Messages:
    727
    Likes Received:
    14
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #4
    ooo lol didnt notice that was a YPN ad :(
     
    phillip, Oct 5, 2006 IP
  5. MrX

    MrX Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,563
    Likes Received:
    77
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #5
    Yeah I was actually referring to having both Yahoo and AdSense, but didn't realize he had too many units.

    I'm near Torrance.
     
    MrX, Oct 5, 2006 IP
  6. Abhik

    Abhik ..:: The ONE ::..

    Messages:
    11,337
    Likes Received:
    606
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    410
    Digital Goods:
    2
    #6
    Yes.. that page contains 3 Google Ad unit, one link unit and one YPN Ad unit..
    surely violation of TOS
     
    Abhik, Oct 6, 2006 IP
  7. Barti1987

    Barti1987 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,703
    Likes Received:
    115
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    185
    #7
    it is..

    its also an mfa site it seems

    Peace,
     
    Barti1987, Oct 6, 2006 IP
  8. toomuch72

    toomuch72 Peon

    Messages:
    165
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    Botox is also a prescription medication so it may break the T&C because it violates the promote drug clause.
     
    toomuch72, Oct 6, 2006 IP