It's called the 9/11 Report where people better than you will ever be spent years and years of man hours investigating. You've probably never heard of a flight list have you? Did you have some more super duper smoking guns? Did you ever answer that question I asked: Do you ever question those who pretend to question 9/11?
As opposed to young angry white males with low IQs who create videos that are debunked so often, they have to create a new one? You did say facts matter, right? Oh, my bad, you haven't said that yet, nevermind
LOL I notice you have 5,706 posts. I bet a lot of them contain the words "young angry white males with low IQs" http://forums.digitalpoint.com/search.php?searchid=1906463 I make that at least 51 seperate threads using that mendacious line. You're wearing it out mate.
You got that right there. I laugh at him because he is brainwashed and quotes things as facts based on what he is told by FOX/CNN without even thinking.
Wow, what a switch. Now it is not just that there Fox News, but that there CNN as well partner? Next thing you know it will be that there NY Times and LA Times as well.
I'm glad I have such a profound impact on you If you could only find those lost civil liberties you pretend to care about. Any luck? Speaking of "thinking," you never did answer; do you question those who pretend to question 9/11? Facts without thinking, eh?
GTech is under the impression that if he keeps saying "show me those lost civil liberties" in each and every post, that his argument is valid. His idiocy has become visible to everyone now that he continues to repeat that sentence after lost civil liberties have been identified. I nominate GTech as the stupidest member of digitalpoint.
I'd be happy if you could actually find lost civil liberties. Of course, that would be an important part of backing up your attack on America. Apparently neither of you can find them, but go out of your way to prove that facts don't matter. You've done more to prove my point that I ever could have.
LOL AGS, I wonder how well based your facts is? What about your site that I've debunked from the top to the bottom? What about your comfusion that I was talking about media when I was talking about demolition firms? What about an objective answer to this post(since you still seems to believe that WTC7 was a controlled demolition)? What about posting an offtopic cartoon? Seriously, cut the crap and start argue like a real man!
What parts that do or have impeached on civil liberty's? Before I answer that with some examples I'd like to say again that I just don't feel the need for governments to bring in laws like these for my own "protection" because: 1. The chances of a person in an OECD country being directly effected by a terrorist attack are statistically remote. (When the chances of being killed by a freak occurance such as a bee sting is more likely then the threat of being killed by a terrorist attack must also be relegated to being simply a freak occurance) 2. People should have the right to protect themselves. Examples of civil liberty conflicts within the USA Patriot Act: Section 215, which allows judges to grant government investigators ex parte orders to look into personal records (including financial, medical, phone, Internet, student or library records) on the basis of being "relevant for an on going investigation concerning international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities", rather than probable cause as outlined in the fourth amendment. January 23, 2004, U.S. District Judge Audrey Collins ruled that Section 805 (which classifies "expert advice or assistance" as material support to terrorism) was vague and in violation of the First and Fifth Amendments, marking the first legal decision to set a part of the Act aside. On September 29, 2004, U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero struck down Section 505 which allowed the government to issue "National Security Letters" to obtain sensitive customer records from Internet service providers and other businesses without judicial oversight as a violation of the First and Fourth Amendment. The court also found the broad gag provision in the law to be an "unconstitutional prior restraint" on free speech.
Civil rights are disappearing everywhere in the world, US is not a unique example. This is a couple of laws that have been implemented in Sweden the recent years(I will try to translate): All residents SMS, emails, calling must be stored in 6-24 months(EU law, implemented in December 2005) The police have the right to take DNA samples of an innocent(Swedish lawpassed in November 2005) The police have the right to use wiretapping information for solving a another crime than the wiretapping was originally porpused for. Since July 2005 is Swedish police allowed to help foreign police to make a wiretap in Sweden. Since April 2006, the police have the right to check ones health records if the person is believed to serve as a threat for the Royalty or the Government. The integrity breaking laws was taken from this site, but that's just a few. There's many more laws as you can see here under Lista 2: Nya lagar om övervakning i Sverige (both passed and not passed) All of them were made the last few years. The reason for these laws are mostly to fight organized criminality.
Yeah this is my main concern Latehorn. It seems to be a world wide trend. Same sorts of things happening in Australia and New Zealand.