Hi mate, Domains are only valuable if you are able to build a site on them that is going to become something within the public domain, basically meaning that if you were going to register the domains listed you would have to work hard to produce a site that justifies it. OnlineTemplateMaker.com is a nice domain, little long but should work well for a site that enables users to create a template and then have it created for free/a fee. As for the others... not really anything that stands out in my opinion.
Long domain names with 2 words in them are just garbage. As you can see here: http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-20019282-264.html ICANN is going to introduce domains such as: gaming.energize arcade.skills go.website online.template 4.pad In 2012, everyone with two words domain names are going to become worthless.
If what you are saying is true then the likes of OnlinePoker.com will become worthless. The fact of the matter is that keyword domains are going to become a little bit harder to rank within the search engines, thats all. Unless the likes of Google and Yahoo are about to overwrite what they have had in operation for the last decade and longer, domains with '.' in them are not going to be worth the reg fee let alone the time to develop a website.
Website development as nothing to do with the quality of a domain name. OnlinePoker.com is a worthless domain without development because the guy who owns Poker.com could easily create a subdomain like Online.Poker.com or in the future, create the .Poker extension and create Online.Poker If OnlinePoker.com shutdown in the future, it's going to be worth $0 This is the reason why I dislike gTLDs, anyone can create an infinite amount of extensions. Don't get me wrong here, the "." (dot) is not going to disappear because with out it, ICANN aren't going to be making money with it and browsers such as google chrome need the "." (dot) to go render websites, without the "." (dot) chrome is going to send you to google search. All im saying is that domain hacks such as Log.In, Click.Me, Inter.Net, Chi.Co ect... are going to be worth more because you cannot replicate them by creating new extensions. - You cannot create less then 2 letter extensions because they are ccTLDs. - You can create (something).LogIn but it's another ugly 2 words stick together. - You can create (something).Log but In.Log is not the correct spelling. - You can create (something).Gin but Lo.Gin is just weird. - You can create Log.Log but it's repetitive. - You can create Log.In.Com if you own In.Com but it's long and ".com" make it look worthless. - You can create B.Log wich is good but the extension needs to be popular and it's not Log.In that people want. See what i mean ? Just because it's a ".com" doesn't mean it's a good domain. ".com" doesn't make you "future-proof". Log.In is better then LogIn.Com or Log.In.Com
I think this is just a spam post since all those domains are taken by the same person and also posted on other sites like this....